Full-reference video quality metric assisted the development of no-reference bitstream video quality metrics for real-time network monitoring

High-quality video is being increasingly delivered over Internet Protocol networks, which means that network operators and service providers need methods to measure the quality of experience (QoE) of the video services. In this paper, we propose a method to speed up the development of no-reference bitstream objective metrics for estimating QoE. This method uses full-reference objective metrics, which makes the process significantly faster and more convenient than using subjective tests. In this process, we have evaluated six publicly available full-reference objective metrics in three different databases, the EPFL-PoliMI database, the HDTV database, and the Live Video Wireless database, all containing transmission distortions in H.264 coded video. The objective metrics could be used to speed up the development process of no-reference real-time video QoE monitoring methods that are receiving great interest from the research community. We show statistically that the full-reference metric Video Quality Metric (VQM) performs best considering all the databases. In the EPFL-PoliMI database, SPATIAL MOVIE performed best and TEMPORAL MOVIE performed worst. When transmission distortions are evaluated, using the compressed video as the reference provides greater accuracy than using the uncompressed original video as the reference, at least for the studied metrics. Further, we use VQM to train a lightweight no-reference bitstream model, which uses the packet loss rate and the interval between instantaneous decoder refresh frames, both easily accessible in a video quality monitoring system.

[1]  Marcus Barkowsky,et al.  ANALYSIS OF FREELY AVAILABLE SUBJECTIVE DATASET FOR HDTV INCLUDING CODING AND TRANSMISSION DISTORTIONS , 2010 .

[2]  Marcus Barkowsky,et al.  Analysis of Freely Available Dataset for HDTV including Coding and Transmission Distortions , 2010 .

[3]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Motion Tuned Spatio-Temporal Quality Assessment of Natural Videos , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[4]  Stefano Tubaro,et al.  No-Reference Video Quality Monitoring for H.264/AVC Coded Video , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[5]  Sheila S. Hemami,et al.  VSNR: A Wavelet-Based Visual Signal-to-Noise Ratio for Natural Images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[6]  Chulhee Lee,et al.  Objective video quality assessment , 2006 .

[7]  Ali C. Begen,et al.  Not All Packets Are Equal, Part 2: The Impact of Network Packet Loss on Video Quality , 2009, IEEE Internet Computing.

[8]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Multi-scale structural similarity for image quality assessment , 2003 .

[9]  Vincent Barriac,et al.  Standardization activities in the ITU for a QoE assessment of IPTV , 2008, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[10]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  41 OBJECTIVE VIDEO QUALITY ASSESSMENT , 2003 .

[11]  Ali C. Begen,et al.  IPTV and video networks in the 2015 timeframe: The evolution to medianets , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[12]  Amy R. Reibman,et al.  Quality monitoring of video over a packet network , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[13]  Stefan Winkler,et al.  The Evolution of Video Quality Measurement: From PSNR to Hybrid Metrics , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[14]  Alexander Raake,et al.  Towards content-related features for parametric video quality prediction of IPTV services , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[15]  Sheila S. Hemami,et al.  No-reference image and video quality estimation: Applications and human-motivated design , 2010, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[16]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Wireless Video Quality Assessment: A Study of Subjective Scores and Objective Algorithms , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[18]  Rajiv Soundararajan,et al.  Study of Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Video , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[19]  Nick Campbell,et al.  Presentation quality assessment using acoustic information and hand movements , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[20]  Marcus Barkowsky,et al.  Hybrid video quality prediction: reviewing video quality measurement for widening application scope , 2014, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[21]  K. Brunnstrom,et al.  Reconstruction of incomplete decoded videos for use in objective quality metrics , 2012, 2012 19th International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing (IWSSIP).

[22]  Stefano Tubaro,et al.  A H.264/AVC video database for the evaluation of quality metrics , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[23]  S. Tubaro,et al.  Subjective assessment of H.264/AVC video sequences transmitted over a noisy channel , 2009, 2009 International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience.

[24]  Fernando A. Kuipers,et al.  Techniques for Measuring Quality of Experience , 2010, WWIC.

[25]  Kjell Brunnström,et al.  VQeg validation and ITU standardization of objective perceptual video quality metrics [Standards in a Nutshell] , 2009, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[26]  Maria Kihl,et al.  Evaluation of video quality metrics on transmission distortions in H.264 coded video , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB).

[27]  Margaret H. Pinson,et al.  A new standardized method for objectively measuring video quality , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.