From Biology to Mathematical Models and Back: Teaching Modeling to Biology Students, and Biology to Math and Engineering Students

We describe the development of a course to teach modeling and mathematical analysis skills to students of biology and to teach biology to students with strong backgrounds in mathematics, physics, or engineering. The two groups of students have different ways of learning material and often have strong negative feelings toward the area of knowledge that they find difficult. To give students a sense of mastery in each area, several complementary approaches are used in the course: 1) a “live” textbook that allows students to explore models and mathematical processes interactively; 2) benchmark problems providing key skills on which students make continuous progress; 3) assignment of students to teams of two throughout the semester; 4) regular one-on-one interactions with instructors throughout the semester; and 5) a term project in which students reconstruct, analyze, extend, and then write in detail about a recently published biological model. Based on student evaluations and comments, an attitude survey, and the quality of the students' term papers, the course has significantly increased the ability and willingness of biology students to use mathematical concepts and modeling tools to understand biological systems, and it has significantly enhanced engineering students' appreciation of biology.

[1]  L. Aiken,et al.  The identification of number anxiety in a college population. , 1957 .

[2]  W. L. Sumner.  The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution , 1959, Nature.

[3]  R. Leighton,et al.  The Feynman Lectures on Physics; Vol. I , 1965 .

[4]  A. Barois.  [Hyperbaric oxygen therapy]. , 1966, Revue de l'infirmiere et de l'assistante sociale.

[5]  R. Leighton,et al.  Feynman Lectures on Physics , 1971 .

[6]  J. Jack,et al.  Electric current flow in excitable cells , 1975 .

[7]  S. Tobias.  Overcoming Math Anxiety , 1978 .

[8]  E. Keller,et al.  A feeling for the organism : the life and work of Barbara McClintock , 1985 .

[9]  G. Ermentrout,et al.  Analysis of neural excitability and oscillations , 1989 .

[10]  Idan Segev,et al.  Methods in neuronal modeling: From synapses to networks , 1989 .

[11]  A. Roli.  Artificial Neural Networks , 2012, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[12]  H. Chiel.  Critical Thinking in a Neurobiology Course. , 1996 .

[13]  J. Ruppersberg.  Ion Channels in Excitable Membranes , 1996 .

[14]  Dorothea Heiss-Czedik,et al.  An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms. , 1997, Artificial Life.

[15]  Randall D. Beer,et al.  Using autonomous robotics to teach science and engineering , 1999, Commun. ACM.

[16]  J. Kruger,et al.  Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  R. Albert,et al.  The large-scale organization of metabolic networks , 2000, Nature.

[18]  J. Tyson,et al.  Regulation of the eukaryotic cell cycle: molecular antagonism, hysteresis, and irreversible transitions. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[19]  Yoshinobu Inada,et al.  Order and flexibility in the motion of fish schools. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[20]  T. Seeley,et al.  Deciding on a new home: how do honeybees agree? , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  B. Ryffel,et al.  Overexpression of Toll-Like Receptor 4 Amplifies the Host Response to Lipopolysaccharide and Provides a Survival Advantage in Transgenic Mice 1 , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[22]  Division on Earth.  BIO2010: Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists , 2003 .

[23]  Louis J Gross.  Interdisciplinarity and the undergraduate biology curriculum: finding a balance. , 2004, Cell biology education.

[24]  B. Yegnanarayana,et al.  Artificial Neural Networks , 2004 .

[25]  T. Ideker.  Systems biology 101—what you need to know , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[26]  J. Froyd,et al.  Integrated Engineering Curricula , 2005 .

[27]  Yoseph Bar-Cohen,et al.  Biomimetics : Biologically Inspired Technologies , 2011 .

[28]  D. Bolt,et al.  Effect of Technology-Enhanced Continuous Progress Monitoring on Math Achievement , 2007 .

[29]  H. Chiel,et al.  Calcium dynamics: analyzing the Ca2+ regulatory network in intact cells , 2008, Trends in Neurosciences.

[30]  A. Perelson,et al.  Modeling complex decay profiles of hepatitis B virus during antiviral therapy , 2009, Hepatology.

[31]  D. Swigon,et al.  A simple mathematical model of signaling resulting from the binding of lipopolysaccharide with Toll-like receptor 4 demonstrates inherent preconditioning behavior. , 2009, Mathematical biosciences.

[32]  M. Ashcraft,et al.  Mathematics Anxiety and the Affective Drop in Performance , 2009 .

[33]  A. Ahlgren,et al.  Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse , 2010 .

[34]  K. Ward,et al.  An in silico approach to the analysis of acute wound healing , 2010, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[35]  P. David Pearson,et al.  Literacy and Science: Each in the Service of the Other , 2010, Science.