Microphysical process rates and global aerosol–cloud interactions

Abstract. Cloud microphysical process rates control the amount of condensed water in clouds and impact the susceptibility of precipitation to cloud-drop number and aerosols. The relative importance of different microphysical processes in a climate model is analyzed, and the autoconversion and accretion processes are found to be critical to the condensate budget in most regions. A simple steady-state model of warm rain formation is used to illustrate that the diagnostic rain formulations typical of climate models may result in excessive contributions from autoconversion, compared to observations and large eddy simulation models with explicit bin-resolved microphysics and rain formation processes. The behavior does not appear to be caused by the bulk process rate formulations themselves, because the steady-state model with the same bulk accretion and autoconversion has reduced contributions from autoconversion. Sensitivity tests are conducted to analyze how perturbations to the precipitation microphysics for stratiform clouds impact process rates, precipitation susceptibility and aerosol–cloud interactions (ACI). With similar liquid water path, corrections for the diagnostic rain assumptions in the GCM based on the steady-state model to boost accretion indicate that the radiative effects of ACI may decrease by 20% in the GCM. Links between process rates, susceptibility and ACI are not always clear in the GCM. Better representation of the precipitation process, for example by prognosticating precipitation mass and number, may help better constrain these effects in global models with bulk microphysics schemes.

[1]  Robert Wood,et al.  Drizzle in Stratiform Boundary Layer Clouds. Part II: Microphysical Aspects. , 2005 .

[2]  S. Twomey The Influence of Pollution on the Shortwave Albedo of Clouds , 1977 .

[3]  N. McFarlane,et al.  Sensitivity of Climate Simulations to the Parameterization of Cumulus Convection in the Canadian Climate Centre General Circulation Model , 1995, Data, Models and Analysis.

[4]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  The impact of humidity above stratiform clouds on indirect aerosol climate forcing , 2004, Nature.

[5]  David S. Lee,et al.  Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application , 2010 .

[6]  Karl E. Taylor,et al.  An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design , 2012 .

[7]  V. Ramanathan,et al.  Aerosols, Climate, and the Hydrological Cycle , 2001, Science.

[8]  B. Stevens,et al.  Understanding macrophysical outcomes of microphysical choices in simulations of shallow cumulus convection , 2008 .

[9]  Olivier Boucher,et al.  The sulfate‐CCN‐cloud albedo effect , 1995 .

[10]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  A new two-moment bulk stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model, version 3 (CAM3). Part I: Description and numerical tests , 2008 .

[11]  D. W. Johnson,et al.  The Measurement and Parameterization of Effective Radius of Droplets in Warm Stratocumulus Clouds , 1994 .

[12]  Hongli Jiang,et al.  Effect of Aerosol on the Susceptibility and Efficiency of Precipitation in Warm Trade Cumulus Clouds , 2010 .

[13]  Robert Wood,et al.  Understanding the Importance of Microphysics and Macrophysics for Warm Rain in Marine Low Clouds. Part II: Heuristic Models of Rain Formation , 2009 .

[14]  J. Golaz,et al.  Aerosol effects on stratocumulus water paths in a PDF‐based parameterization , 2011 .

[15]  M. Lebsock,et al.  On the precipitation susceptibility of clouds to aerosol perturbations , 2009 .

[16]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  The Evolution of Climate Sensitivity and Climate Feedbacks in the Community Atmosphere Model , 2012 .

[17]  S. Twomey,et al.  Determining the Susceptibility of Cloud Albedo to Changes in Droplet Concentration with the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer , 1994 .

[18]  B. Stevens,et al.  Untangling aerosol effects on clouds and precipitation in a buffered system , 2009, Nature.

[19]  S. Klein,et al.  Global simulations of ice nucleation and ice supersaturation with an improved cloud scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model , 2010 .

[20]  U. Lohmann,et al.  Introduction of prognostic rain in ECHAM5: design and single column model simulations , 2007 .

[21]  M. Khairoutdinov,et al.  A New Cloud Physics Parameterization in a Large-Eddy Simulation Model of Marine Stratocumulus , 2000 .

[22]  C. Bretherton,et al.  The VAMOS Ocean-Cloud-Atmosphere-Land Study Regional Experiment (VOCALS-REx): goals, platforms, and field operations , 2010 .

[23]  J. Penner,et al.  Satellite methods underestimate indirect climate forcing by aerosols , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Cloud—Aerosol Interactions from the Micro to the Cloud Scale , 2009 .

[25]  Richard Neale,et al.  Toward a Minimal Representation of Aerosols in Climate Models: Description and Evaluation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5 , 2012 .

[26]  R. Wood,et al.  Drizzle in Stratiform Boundary Layer Clouds , 2005 .

[27]  U. Lohmann,et al.  The sulfate-CCN-cloud albedo effect: a sensitivity study with two general circulation models , 1996 .

[28]  R. Wood,et al.  Does precipitation susceptibility vary with increasing cloud thickness in marine stratocumulus , 2011 .

[29]  R. Marchand,et al.  Constraining cloud lifetime effects of aerosols using A‐Train satellite observations , 2012 .

[30]  S. Solomon,et al.  An observationally based energy balance for the Earth since 1950 , 2009 .

[31]  C. O'Dowd,et al.  Flood or Drought: How Do Aerosols Affect Precipitation? , 2008, Science.

[32]  Jean-Christophe Golaz,et al.  Sensitivity of the Aerosol Indirect Effect to Subgrid Variability in the Cloud Parameterization of the GFDL Atmosphere General Circulation Model AM3 , 2011 .

[33]  O. Boucher,et al.  Satellite-based estimate of the direct and indirect aerosol climate forcing , 2008 .

[34]  G. Feingold,et al.  Cloud–Aerosol Interactions from the Micro to the Cloud Scale , 2009 .

[35]  B. Albrecht Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness , 1989, Science.

[36]  S. Ghan,et al.  A New Two-Moment Bulk Stratiform Cloud Microphysics Scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model, Version 3 (CAM3). Part II: Single-Column and Global Results , 2008 .

[37]  W. Collins,et al.  Description of the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model (CAM 3.0) , 2004 .

[38]  William J. Collins,et al.  Toward a minimal representation of aerosol direct and indirect effects: model description and evaluation , 2011 .