Virtual SCM Impact on E-Business Performance: The European Case

There is no doubt that the Internet represents a business challenge for companies (Teo & Pian, 2003) and that the content of the World Wide Web is useful to millions (Arasu, Cho, Garcia-Molina, Paepcke, & Raghavan, 2001). The estimation of the extension of the web has been the focus of several empirical studies (Bar-Yossef, Berg, Chien, Fakcharoenphol, & Weitz, 2000; Bharat & Broder, 1999; Lawrence & Giles, 1998, 1999). Although there are some differences among findings, most studies indicate that over a billion pages are currently available on the Internet. According to Teo and Pian (2003), nearly 95% of all major companies now have a website.In the electronic commerce age, major challenges facing corporate management in regards to maintaining competitive advantage through several processes include: improvements in production flows, establishment of strong relations with all stakeholders, and the acquisition and application of knowledge, among others (Porter, 2001). In recent decades, organizations have begun to realize the importance of closely managing activities of the supply chain in order to create additional value, which can be grounds for significant competitive advantages. Much research has emerged from the logistics/ distribution and marketing fields as a result, complemented by studies carried out in the information technology field (Nagurney, Loo, Dong, & Zhang, 2002). In light of mounting research, SCM has acquired the status of a generic management concept comprising the systemic implementation of processes that allow the development of competitive advantages and the profitability of firms through the integrated management of distribution channels (Svensson, 2003).Since the 1990s, driven by academic research and organizational practices developed around the concept of e-business, SCM has gained new importance, allowing the modification of the concept into the virtual supply chain management (VSCM). Physical and virtual markets have different intrinsic value systems that must be understood in order to leverage the benefits of the virtual value chain. However, both chains must be managed simultaneously in order to be effective and productive (Rayport & Sviokla, 1995). Although marketing researchers and information system investigators have studied supply chain management to some extent; there are still few conceptual bases available to assess the contribution of supply chain management (SCM) to business success. When analyzing the online performance of companies and the implications of virtual SCM application, these assessment weaknesses assume a major role.The goal of the current study was twofold: (1) to determine whether contextual variables have any effect on SCM adoption level, and (2) to identify the nature of the relationship between VSCM and e-business performance. For this purpose, two sets of propositions were developed: the first relies on exploring the nature of the influence of contextual variables on the adoption of SCM by firms operating in an Internet environment; the second is based on the relationship between e-business success and VSCM initiatives. Since the first is set on the level of adoption of SCM, we examine the contextual aspects involved with firms’ Internet presence. Given the ordinal nature of the dependent variable, the ordered probit model is suitable. Therefore, using a probit model, we verify the influence of contextual variables on SCM adoption. According to our second aim, which was to establish a measurement framework to fill the current gap in research and provide a better understanding of the critical elements of the virtual supply chain and its implications on e-business, a structural equation analysis was performed using a sample of 360 European firms.The framework identifies metrics that can be used to evaluate the impact of virtual supply chain management on business performance. The proposed research model tests four hypotheses: the first is related to the impact of contextual variables in SCM adoption; the second is related to the impact of virtual supply chain management in firms’ performance, and the third and fourth are in regards to the impact of two dimensions in virtual SCM, referenced in literature as critical to firms’ success.In general, our findings support the conceptual framework previously presented, although some of the relationships found were weaker than expected. The results show that the data support our conceptualization for the VSCM construct and allow us to conclude that implementation of a VSCM system has a positive impact on e-business performance. Also, the results support the assumption made regarding the influence of contextual variables on SCM adoption level.This research and its findings will be useful for firms intending to emulate the application of virtual supply chain management, giving insights to managers about the influence of different components of VSCM in e-business performance. The present study advances knowledge on the nature of the relative importance of different components of Internet-based supply chain management as drivers of e-business performance. Some useful preliminary insights are produced, leaving, however, a considerable number of issues for future research, including the possibility of extending the investigation in order to consider the impact of virtual supply chain management in terms of competitive strategy and operational effectiveness. Similarly, this study could be expanded to compare firm performance in e-business versus non-virtual business activities.

[1]  Paul Timmers,et al.  Business Models for Electronic Markets , 1998, Electron. Mark..

[2]  K. Tan Supply Chain Management: Practices, Concerns, and Performance Issues , 2002 .

[3]  Patrick Butler,et al.  A Revolution in Interaction , 1997 .

[4]  John J. Sviokla,et al.  Exploiting the virtual value chain , 1999 .

[5]  Zach G. Zacharia,et al.  DEFINING SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT , 2001 .

[6]  Don Tapscott,et al.  Digital capital: harnessing the power of business Webs , 2000, UBIQ.

[7]  M. Porter Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[8]  Ari-Pekka Hameri,et al.  Experiences of different approaches in logistics , 1991 .

[9]  I. Lewis,et al.  LOGISTICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: A COORDINATION PERSPECTIVE. , 1997 .

[10]  M. Colgate,et al.  Information Technology and Relationship Marketing: Advances, Incompatibilities, and Opportunities , 1999 .

[11]  M. Frohlich,et al.  Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies , 2001 .

[12]  John B. Houlihan International supply chain management , 1985 .

[13]  G. Stevens Integrating the Supply Chain , 1989 .

[14]  Naveen Donthu,et al.  The Internet Shopper , 1999 .

[15]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Integrated Internet marketing , 2000, CACM.

[16]  Bart J. Bronnenberg,et al.  Exploring the implications of the internet for consumer marketing , 1997 .

[17]  M. D. Webber,et al.  Supply-chain management: logistics catches up with strategy , 1982 .

[18]  M. Rappa Business Models on the Web , 2008 .

[19]  Göran Svensson,et al.  Holistic and cross‐disciplinary deficiencies in the theory generation of supply chain management , 2003 .

[20]  Dennis L. Hoffman,et al.  Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments : Conceptual Foundations 1 ) , 1998 .

[21]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Virtual supply-chain management , 2004 .

[22]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. , 1990 .

[23]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  Causal Linkages in Supply Chain Management: An Exploratory Study of North American Manufacturing Firms , 1998 .

[24]  Richard D. Metters,et al.  Quantifying the bullwhip effect in supply chains , 1997 .

[25]  Benn R. Konsynski,et al.  Uses and Consequences of Electronic Markets: An Empirical Investigation in the Aircraft Parts Industry , 1998, MIS Q..

[26]  Cornelia Dröge,et al.  The effects of information system infrastructure and process improvements on supply‐chain time performance , 2000 .

[27]  T. Jones,et al.  Using Inventory for Competitive Advantage through Supply Chain Management , 1985 .

[28]  M. Cooper MESHING MULTIPLE ALLIANCES , 1997 .

[29]  Gregoris Mentzas,et al.  Knowledge Networking in Supply Chains: A Case Study in the Wood/Furniture Sector , 1999, Inf. Knowl. Syst. Manag..

[30]  Stephen John Turner,et al.  Manufacturing sypply chain management: distributed supply chain simulation across enterprise boundaries , 2000, WSC '00.

[31]  Ram Narasimhan,et al.  Environmental supply chain management , 1998 .

[32]  Dennis W. Krumwiede,et al.  The relationship of logistics to supply chain management: developing a common industry definition , 2001, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[33]  Zahirul Hoque,et al.  MARKET COMPETITION, COMPUTER-AIDED MANUFACTURING AND USE OF MULTIPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY , 2001 .

[34]  Ann S. Marucheck,et al.  The Relationship Between EDI and Supplier Reliability , 1997 .

[35]  Sundar G. Bharadwaj,et al.  Sustainable competitive advantage in service industries: A conceptual model and research , 1993 .

[36]  Wim Van Grembergen,et al.  Measuring and managing e-business projects through the balanced scorecard , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[37]  Werner Reinartz,et al.  Measuring the Customer Relationship Management Construct and Linking it to Performance Outcomes , 2003 .

[38]  A. Nagurney,et al.  Supply Chain Networks and Electronic Commerce: A Theoretical Perspective , 2002 .

[39]  Jeannie L. Johnson Strategic integration in industrial distribution channels: Managing the interfirm relationship as a strategic asset , 1999 .

[40]  Ing-Long Wu,et al.  A model for exploring the impact of purchasing strategies on user requirements determination of e-SRM , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[41]  S. Chopra,et al.  Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning & Operation , 2007 .

[42]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect , 1997 .

[43]  L. LeeHau,et al.  Information Distortion in a Supply Chain , 1997 .

[44]  R. Amit,et al.  Value creation in E‐business , 2001 .

[45]  Sungjune Park,et al.  An Investigation of the Roles of Electronic Marketplace in the Supply Chain , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[46]  Haydee S. Sheombar EDI‐induced Redesign of Co‐ordination in Logistics , 1992 .

[47]  Paula M. C. Swatman,et al.  An exploratory study of small business Internet commerce issues , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[48]  J. Gattorna,et al.  Managing the Supply Chain , 1996 .

[49]  Sergio Cavalieri,et al.  Simulation in the supply chain context: a survey , 2004, Comput. Ind..

[50]  Charu Chandra,et al.  Supply chain management in theory and practice: a passing fad or a fundamental change? , 2000, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[51]  Dawn N. Jutla,et al.  E-Business Readiness: A Customer-Focused Framework , 2000 .

[52]  H. Commandeur,et al.  Reconfiguring logistics systems through postponement strategies , 1996 .

[53]  John Gallaugher Challenging to New Conventional Wisdom of Net Commerce Strategies. , 1999 .