Sequence harmony: detecting functional specificity from alignments

Multiple sequence alignments are often used for the identification of key specificity-determining residues within protein families. We present a web server implementation of the Sequence Harmony (SH) method previously introduced. SH accurately detects subfamily specific positions from a multiple alignment by scoring compositional differences between subfamilies, without imposing conservation. The SH web server allows a quick selection of subtype specific sites from a multiple alignment given a subfamily grouping. In addition, it allows the predicted sites to be directly mapped onto a protein structure and displayed. We demonstrate the use of the SH server using the family of plant mitochondrial alternative oxidases (AOX). In addition, we illustrate the usefulness of combining sequence and structural information by showing that the predicted sites are clustered into a few distinct regions in an AOX homology model. The SH web server can be accessed at www.ibi.vu.nl/programs/seqharmwww.

[1]  Paul G Crichton,et al.  Exploring the molecular nature of alternative oxidase regulation and catalysis , 2002, FEBS letters.

[2]  Kai Ye,et al.  A two‐entropies analysis to identify functional positions in the transmembrane region of class A G protein‐coupled receptors , 2006, Proteins.

[3]  Eugene I. Shakhnovich,et al.  Predicting specificity-determining residues in two large eukaryotic transcription factor families , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[4]  M. Gelfand,et al.  Automated selection of positions determining functional specificity of proteins by comparative analysis of orthologous groups in protein families , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[5]  P Nordlund,et al.  A revised model of the active site of alternative oxidase , 1999, FEBS letters.

[6]  L. Mirny,et al.  Using orthologous and paralogous proteins to identify specificity determining residues. , 2002, Genome biology.

[7]  Jaap Heringa,et al.  PRALINE: a multiple sequence alignment toolbox that integrates homology-extended and secondary structure information , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[8]  Jaap Heringa,et al.  The Praline Online Server: Optimising Progressive Multiple Alignment on the Web , 2022 .

[9]  Robert C. Edgar,et al.  MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  L. Mcintosh,et al.  ALTERNATIVE OXIDASE: From Gene to Function. , 1997, Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology.

[11]  J. Whisstock,et al.  Prediction of protein function from protein sequence and structure , 2003, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[12]  A. Moore,et al.  Structure and Function of the Plant Alternative Oxidase: Its Putative Role in the Oxygen Defence Mechanism , 1997, Bioscience reports.

[13]  James Whelan,et al.  Molecular Distinction between Alternative Oxidase from Monocots and Dicots1 , 2002, Plant Physiology.

[14]  Angel Herráez,et al.  Biomolecules in the computer: Jmol to the rescue , 2006, Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[15]  J. Heringa,et al.  Sequence comparison by sequence harmony identifies subtype-specific functional sites , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[16]  Gunter Schneider,et al.  Crystal structure of delta9 stearoyl‐acyl carrier protein desaturase from castor seed and its relationship to other di‐iron proteins. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[17]  N. Guex,et al.  SWISS‐MODEL and the Swiss‐Pdb Viewer: An environment for comparative protein modeling , 1997, Electrophoresis.

[18]  D T Jones,et al.  Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.