An evaluation of methods for encoding multiple 2D spatial data

Datasets over a spatial domain are common in a number of fields, often with multiple layers (or variables) within data that must be understood together via spatial locality. Thus one area of long-standing interest is increasing the number of variables encoded by properties of the visualization. A number of properties have been demonstrated and/or proven successful with specific tasks or data, but there has been relatively little work comparing the utility of diverse techniques for multi-layer visualization. As part of our efforts to evaluate the applicability of such visualizations, we implemented five techniques which represent a broad range of existing research (Color Blending, Oriented Slivers, Data-Driven Spots, Brush Strokes, and Stick Figures). Then we conducted a user study wherein subjects were presented with composites of three, four, and five layers (variables) using one of these methods and asked to perform a task common to our intended end users (GIS analysts). We found that the Oriented Slivers and Data-Driven Spots performed the best, with Stick Figures yielding the lowest accuracy. Through analyzing our data, we hope to gain insight into which techniques merit further exploration and offer promise for visualization of data sets with ever-increasing size.

[1]  Georges G. Grinstein,et al.  Iconographic Displays For Visualizing Multidimensional Data , 1988, Proceedings of the 1988 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[2]  Colin Ware,et al.  Information Visualization: Perception for Design , 2000 .

[3]  David H. Laidlaw,et al.  Visualizing diffusion tensor images of the mouse spinal cord , 1998, Proceedings Visualization '98 (Cat. No.98CB36276).

[4]  Penny Rheingans,et al.  Art-Inspired Techniques For Visualizing Time-Varying Data , 2008 .

[5]  Robert Michael Kirby,et al.  Comparing 2D vector field visualization methods: a user study , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[6]  Victoria Interrante,et al.  Strategies for the visualization of multiple 2D vector fields , 2006, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[7]  James T. Enns,et al.  Perceptually based brush strokes for nonphotorealistic visualization , 2004, TOGS.

[8]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  Diffusion Tensor Visualization with Glyph Packing , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[9]  George F. Jenks “POINTILLISM” AS A CARTOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUE , 1953 .

[10]  Jeff Banfield Rweb:Web-based Statistical Analysis , 1999 .

[11]  Victoria Interrante,et al.  Weaving versus blending: a quantitative assessment of the information carrying capacities of two alternative methods for conveying multivariate data with color , 2006, APGV.

[12]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[13]  Hong Zhou,et al.  Natural Textures for Weather Data Visualization , 2006, Tenth International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV'06).

[14]  Christopher G. Healey,et al.  Visual Perception and Mixed-Initiative Interaction for Assisted Visualization Design , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[15]  Kristin A. Cook,et al.  Illuminating the Path: The Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics , 2005 .

[16]  Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  Multivariate data visualization with data-driven spots , 2003 .

[17]  James T. Enns,et al.  Building perceptual textures to visualize multidimensional datasets , 1998 .

[18]  Victoria Interrante,et al.  Effectively visualizing multi-valued flow data using color and texture , 2003, IEEE Visualization, 2003. VIS 2003..

[19]  Robert Michael Kirby,et al.  Visualizing multivalued data from 2D incompressible flows using concepts from painting , 1999, VIS '99.

[20]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  Data characterization for automatically visualizing heterogeneous information , 1996, Proceedings IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization '96.