Increasing the Cell Number of Host Tetraploid Embryos Can Improve the Production of Mice Derived from Embryonic Stem Cells1

Abstract Tetraploid (4n) embryo complementation assay has shown that embryonic stem (ES) cells alone are capable of supporting embryonic development (ES mouse), allowing the recovery of mouse lines directly from cultured ES cell lines. Although the advantages of this technique are well recognized, it remains inefficient for generating ES mice. In the present study, we investigated the effects of cell number of host 4n embryos on the production of ES mice. Four independent ES cell lines (two general ES cell lines and two nuclear transfer-derived ES cell lines) were used, and each cell line was aggregated with single (1×) to triple (3×) host 4n embryos. We found that birth rate of ES mice using 1× 4n embryos was quite low (0–2%) regardless of cell line, whereas except for one cell line, approximately 6–14% of embryos developed to full term in the case of 3× 4n embryos. Contamination of host 4n cells in ES mice was quite rare, being comparable to that generated using general methods even if they were delivered from 3× 4n host embryos. These results demonstrate that the use of 3× 4n embryos is effective for generating ES mice. Our technique described here will be applicable to any ES cell line, including general ES cell lines used for gene targeting.

[1]  T. Wakayama Production of cloned mice and ES cells from adult somatic cells by nuclear transfer: how to improve cloning efficiency? , 2007, The Journal of reproduction and development.

[2]  A. Hadjantonakis,et al.  Production of chimeras by aggregation of embryonic stem cells with diploid or tetraploid mouse embryos , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[3]  S. Nishikawa,et al.  Equivalency of Nuclear Transfer‐Derived Embryonic Stem Cells to Those Derived from Fertilized Mouse Blastocysts , 2006, Stem cells.

[4]  Hiroshi Ohta,et al.  Significant improvement of mouse cloning technique by treatment with trichostatin A after somatic nuclear transfer. , 2006, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[5]  N. Ogonuki,et al.  Noninvasive visualization of molecular events in the mammalian zygote , 2005, Genesis.

[6]  H. Ohta,et al.  Generation of Normal Progeny by Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Following Grafting of Testicular Tissue from Cloned Mice That Died Postnatally1 , 2005, Biology of reproduction.

[7]  H. Ohta,et al.  Establishment of Male and Female Nuclear Transfer Embryonic Stem Cell Lines from Different Mouse Strains and Tissues1 , 2005, Biology of reproduction.

[8]  H. Ohta,et al.  Propagation of an infertile hermaphrodite mouse lacking germ cells by using nuclear transfer and embryonic stem cell technology. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  R. Behringer,et al.  Tetraploid development in the mouse , 2003, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[10]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  Hybrid vigor, fetal overgrowth, and viability of mice derived by nuclear cloning and tetraploid embryo complementation , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  V. Tabar,et al.  Differentiation of Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Generated from Adult Somatic Cells by Nuclear Transfer , 2001, Science.

[12]  M. Okabe,et al.  Real‐time observation of transplanted ‘green germ cells’: Proliferation and differentiation of stem cells , 2000, Development, growth & differentiation.

[13]  リュウゾウ ヤナギマチ Mammalian transgenesis by intracytoplasmic sperm injection , 1999 .

[14]  M. Ikawa,et al.  Real‐time observation of acrosomal dispersal from mouse sperm using GFP as a marker protein , 1999, FEBS letters.

[15]  Maurizio Zuccotti,et al.  Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei , 1998, Nature.

[16]  Tomoko Nakanishi,et al.  ‘Green mice’ as a source of ubiquitous green cells , 1997, FEBS letters.

[17]  K. Fukuta,et al.  Preimplantation development of tetraploid mouse embryo produced by cytochalasin B. , 1995, Experimental animals.

[18]  J. Roder,et al.  Derivation of completely cell culture-derived mice from early-passage embryonic stem cells. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Yamamura Ken-ichi,et al.  Efficient selection for high-expression transfectants with a novel eukaryotic vector , 1991 .

[20]  H. Niwa,et al.  Efficient selection for high-expression transfectants with a novel eukaryotic vector. , 1991, Gene.

[21]  M. Kaufman,et al.  Postimplantation development of tetraploid mouse embryos produced by electrofusion. , 1990, Development.

[22]  J. Rossant,et al.  Embryonic stem cells alone are able to support fetal development in the mouse. , 1990, Development.

[23]  J. Lewis,et al.  An improved culture medium supports development of random-bred 1-cell mouse embryos in vitro. , 1989, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[24]  M. Monk,et al.  HPRT-deficient (Lesch–Nyhan) mouse embryos derived from germline colonization by cultured cells , 1987, Nature.

[25]  M. Capecchi The new mouse genetics: altering the genome by gene targeting. , 1989, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[26]  David W. Melton,et al.  Targetted correction of a mutant HPRT gene in mouse embryonic stem cells , 1987, Nature.

[27]  Y. Toyoda Studies on fertilization of mouse eggs in vitro. I. In vitro fertilization of eggs by fresh epididymal sperm , 1971 .

[28]  M. Yokoyama,et al.  Studies on the fertilization of mouse eggs in vitro , 1971 .