Proximal contribution to a linear static model of accommodation and vergence.

To determine the influence of target proximity on accommodation and vergence under both open- (OL) and closed-loop (CL) viewing conditions, a static interactive feedback model, which included proximal accommodation (PA) and proximal vergence (PV) inputs, was developed and analysed quantitatively. It was based on an earlier static dual-interactive feedback model of accommodation and vergence. The proximal inputs were added to both the accommodative and vergence loops at the output of the respective controllers. The values of the PA and PV gains were obtained from experimental dual-OL data. The model equations were analysed over a stimulus range of 1 to 6 D (or MA). It was found that under the dual-OL condition, the contribution of PA to the overall accommodative output ranged from 42.5 to 81.6%, whereas the contribution of PV to the overall vergence output ranged from 56.1 to 88.5%. In contrast, under all other stimulus conditions, with the exception of the PA contribution to the accommodative output under the Aol, Vcl condition (26.5-41.0%), the relative contributions were much smaller, ranging from 0.04 to approximately 7.0%. In particular, under the dual-CL condition, representing the normal binocular visual feedback condition, the relative contributions were only 4.0 and 0.04% for PA and PV, respectively. Thus, although the relative contributions of PA and PV were large under the dual-OL condition, they were generally very small under the various CL conditions that simulated more naturalistic viewing situations. Nevertheless, proximity may still play an important role by providing cues for attaining coordinated and harmonious motor responses under specific viewing conditions.

[1]  B. Gilmartin,et al.  Assessment of the CA/C Ratio in a Myopic Population , 1988, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[2]  K N OGLE,et al.  On the accommodative convergence and the proximal convergence. , 1957, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.

[3]  G K Hung Adaptation model of accommodation and vergence , 1992, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[4]  K. Ciuffreda,et al.  Temporal characteristics of proximally‐induced accommodation , 1993, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[5]  G. Hung,et al.  The linearity of proximally induced accommodation and vergence. , 1991, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  M. Alpern,et al.  Vergence and Accommodation: II. Is Accommodative Vergence Related Merely to the Accommodation Stimulus? , 1958 .

[7]  B. Wick Clinical Factors in Proximal Vergence , 1985, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[8]  B Gilmartin,et al.  Effect of target proximity on the open-loop accommodative response. , 1990, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[9]  G K Hung,et al.  Identification of accommodative vergence contribution to the near response using response variance. , 1983, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  E F FINCHAM,et al.  The Accommodation Reflex and its Stimulus * , 1951, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  K J Ciuffreda,et al.  Effect of surround propinquity on the open-loop accommodative response. , 1991, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  L. Ko,et al.  A biometric study of ocular changes during accommodation. , 1993, American journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  F. Campbell,et al.  A method for measuring the depth of field of the human eye. , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  G. Hung,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of relative accommodation and vergence , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  K J Ciuffreda,et al.  Proximally induced accommodation and accommodative adaptation. , 1990, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  Mark Rosenfield,et al.  Tonic accommodation: a review I. Basic aspects , 1993, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[17]  B. Gilmartin,et al.  EFFECT OF A NEAR‐VISION TASK ON THE RESPONSE AC/A OF A MYOPIC POPULATION , 1987, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[18]  M W Morgan,et al.  Accommodation and vergence. , 1968, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[19]  G K Hung,et al.  Vergence eye movements under natural viewing conditions. , 1994, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  C. Schor,et al.  Negative feedback control model of proximal convergence and accommodation , 1992, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[21]  George K. Hung,et al.  Static Behavior of Accommodation and Vergence: Computer Simulation of an Interactive Dual-Feedback System , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  George K. Hung,et al.  A Dual-Mode Dynamic Model of the Vergence Eye Movement System , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  E E Maddox,et al.  Investigations in the Relation between Convergence and Accommodation of the Eyes. , 1886, Journal of anatomy and physiology.

[24]  G.K. Hung Quantitative analysis of associated and disassociated phorias: linear and nonlinear static models , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  K J Ciuffreda,et al.  Accommodation and Apparent Distance , 1988, Perception.

[26]  B Gilmartin,et al.  Temporal Aspects of Accommodative Adaptation , 1989, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[27]  D. Henson,et al.  Influence of proximal, accommodative and disparity stimuli upon the vergence system * , 1993, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[28]  K. Ciuffreda,et al.  Static accommodation in congenital nystagmus. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[29]  Hofstetter Hw The relationship of proximal convergence to fusional and accommodative convergence. , 1951 .

[30]  B Gilmartin,et al.  Tonic accommodation: a review. II. Accommodative adaptation and clinical aspects , 1994, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[31]  G WESTHEIMER,et al.  Dynamics of accommodation responses of the human eye , 1960, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  K. Ciuffreda,et al.  TIME COURSE AND DECAY OF EFFECTS OF NEAR WORK ON TONIC ACCOMMODATION AND TONIC VERGENCE , 1987, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[33]  E. Fincham,et al.  Accommodation and convergence in the absence of retinal images , 1962 .