Image analysis combined with quantitative cytochemistry

SummaryThis paper describes the application of image analysis combined with a quantitative staining method for the analysis of cervical specimens. The image analysis is carried out with the Leyden Television Analysis System, LEYTAS, of which two versions are described. LEYTAS-1 as well as LEYTAS-2 have both been designed with a high degree of flexibility and interaction facilities. A much wider range of image analysis programs is however, possible with LEYTAS-2, enabling many applications. LEYTAS-1, the earlier version, consists of a Leitz microscope with automated functions, a TV camera, the Texture Analysis System (TAS, Leitz), a four-bit grey value memory and a minicomputer (PDP 11/23). Using this instrumentation 1,500 cervical smears prepared from cell suspensions and stained with acriflavin-Feulgen-Sits have been analysed in a completely automated procedure. Image transformations working in parallel on entire fields, have been used for cell selection and artefact rejection. Resulting alarms, consisting of selected single cells and non-rejected artefacts are stored in the grey value memory, which is displayed on a TV monitor. This option allows visual interaction after the machine diagnosis has been made. The machine diagnosis was correct in 320 out 321 specimens with a severe dysplasia or more serious lesion. The false positive rate in 561 morphologically negative specimens (normal and inflammation) was 16% (machine diagnosis). Visual interaction by subtracting the visually recognized false alarms from the total number of alarms reduces the false positive rate to 11%. In LEYTAS-2, which is based on LEYTAS-1 studies, the microscope is equipped with a new type of objective, enabling the analysis of microscope fields, which are four times as large as in LEYTAS-1. The image analysis part consists of the Modular Image Analysis Computer (MIAC, Leitz) and for alarm storage an eight-bit grey value processor is used. Comparison with LEYTAS-1 shows that cell selection capacities are similar and that the speed is four times higher.

[1]  Arnold W. M. Smeulders,et al.  Some shape parameters for cell recognition , 1980 .

[2]  G. P. Vooys,et al.  Field test results using the BioPEPR cervical smear prescreening system. , 1980, Cytometry.

[3]  F. Meyer Iterative image transformations for an automatic screening of cervical smears. , 1979, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[4]  A.W.M. Smeulders Pattern analysis of cervical specimens , 1983 .

[5]  H. Tanke,et al.  A preparation technique for exfoliated and aspirated cells allowing different staining procedures. , 1980, Analytical and quantitative cytology.

[6]  Johan S. Ploem,et al.  The Use of LEYTAS in Analytical and Quantitative Cytology , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  J S Ploem,et al.  LEYTAS: a system for the processing of microscopic images. , 1980, Analytical and quantitative cytology.

[8]  D. Evans,et al.  Quality control in cervical cytology , 1974, Journal of clinical pathology.

[9]  Jean Serra,et al.  Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology , 1983 .

[10]  H. E. Christensen,et al.  Reliability of Histo-Pathological Diagnosis of Squamous Epithelial Changes of the Uterine Cervix , 1979 .

[11]  C. Cornelisse,et al.  DNA image cytometry on machine-selected breast cancer cells and a comparison between flow cytometry and scanning cytophotometry. , 1985, Cytometry.

[12]  N. Tanaka,et al.  Field test and experimental use of CYBEST model 2 for practical gynecologic mass screening. , 1979, Analytical and quantitative cytology.

[13]  Husain Oa,et al.  A sample preparation for automated cervical cancer screening. , 1978 .

[14]  H. Tanke,et al.  Preparation of monolayer smears from paraffin-embedded tissue for image cytometry. , 1985, Cytometry.

[15]  H. E. Christensen,et al.  Reliability of Histo‐Pathological Diagnosis of Squamous Epithelial Changes of The Uterine Cervix , 1978, Acta pathologica et microbiologica Scandinavica. Section A, Pathology.

[16]  J. Ploem,et al.  An automated microscope for quantitative cytology combining television image analysis and stage scanning microphotometry. , 1979, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[17]  Vance Am,et al.  A preparation technique for exfoliated and aspirated cells allowing different staining procedures. , 1980 .