Regulation of Microbial Metabolic Rates Using CRISPR Interference With Expanded PAM Sequences

Genome-editing CRISPR/Cas9 technology has led to the development of artificial transcriptional repressors, also known as CRISPR interference (CRISPRi). The deactivated Cas9 (dCas9) protein guided by crRNA can specifically bind to target DNA sequences, including promoters and operators, without DNA cleavage. Protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence dependence may be disadvantageous in the design of target-specific CRISPRi, as the PAM sequence is essential for DNA cleavage by the CRISPR/Cas9 system. We constructed a chromosomally integrated dCas9 system (ΔaraBAD:dcas9) in Escherichia coli under the control of the L-arabinose-inducible PBAD promoter. Plasmids carrying various crRNAs with target sequences specific for the gal promoter (−10 region), and the galETK structural genes in the gal operon, were transformed into dCas9-expressing E. coli. Cellular growth and/or galactose metabolic rates were monitored in the presence or absence of gratuitous L-arabinose. D-galactose consumption and cell growth rates were partially retarded by targeting transcriptional elongation but were fully inhibited by targeting transcriptional initiation. Moreover, RT-qPCR analysis showed that CRISPRi with several modified PAM sequences can repress the transcription of target DNAs. These results indicate that cellular metabolic rates and cell growth can be controlled by targeting structural genes or regulatory regions using CRISPRi; also, a loose PAM sequence dependence can expand the DNA targets of CRISPRi.

[1]  Hao Song,et al.  CRISPRi-sRNA: Transcriptional-Translational Regulation of Extracellular Electron Transfer in Shewanella oneidensis. , 2017, ACS synthetic biology.

[2]  F. Zhang,et al.  CRISPR/Cas9 for genome editing: progress, implications and challenges. , 2014, Human molecular genetics.

[3]  Magnus Lundgren,et al.  The CRISPR-Cas immune system: biology, mechanisms and applications. , 2015, Biochimie.

[4]  B. Wanner,et al.  One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  J. Doudna,et al.  A conformational checkpoint between DNA binding and cleavage by CRISPR-Cas9 , 2017, Science Advances.

[6]  Feng Zhang,et al.  Programmable repression and activation of bacterial gene expression using an engineered CRISPR-Cas system , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  Robert J Linhardt,et al.  CRISPRi-mediated metabolic engineering of E. coli for O-methylated anthocyanin production , 2017, Microbial Cell Factories.

[8]  S. Adhya,et al.  Differential role of base pairs on gal promoters strength. , 2015, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  Dong-Woo Lee,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of redox reactions reveals metabolic engineering targets for D-lactate overproduction in Escherichia coli. , 2013, Metabolic engineering.

[10]  Dae-Hee Lee,et al.  CRISPR interference-guided multiplex repression of endogenous competing pathway genes for redirecting metabolic flux in Escherichia coli , 2017, Microbial Cell Factories.

[11]  G. Zhu,et al.  CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification confirms the cause-effect relationship between gyrA mutation and quinolone resistance in Escherichia coli , 2018, FEMS microbiology letters.

[12]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  A conformational checkpoint between DNA binding and cleavage by CRISPR-Cas9 , 2017 .

[13]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  CRISPR-Cas guides the future of genetic engineering , 2018, Science.

[14]  Xiaoshu Xu,et al.  A CRISPR-dCas Toolbox for Genetic Engineering and Synthetic Biology. , 2019, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  Sang Jun Lee,et al.  Cellular stress created by intermediary metabolite imbalances , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  L. Marraffini,et al.  CRISPR interference: RNA-directed adaptive immunity in bacteria and archaea , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[17]  Luke A. Gilbert,et al.  CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) for sequence-specific control of gene expression , 2013, Nature Protocols.

[18]  M. Jinek,et al.  Structural basis of PAM-dependent target DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease , 2014, Nature.

[19]  Benjamin L. Oakes,et al.  Programmable RNA recognition and cleavage by CRISPR/Cas9 , 2014, Nature.

[20]  Maxime Québatte,et al.  Systems-level interference strategies to decipher host factors involved in bacterial pathogen interaction: from RNAi to CRISPRi. , 2017, Current opinion in microbiology.

[21]  J. García-Martínez,et al.  Short motif sequences determine the targets of the prokaryotic CRISPR defence system. , 2009, Microbiology.

[22]  John S. Hawkins,et al.  Targeted Transcriptional Repression in Bacteria Using CRISPR Interference (CRISPRi). , 2015, Methods in molecular biology.

[23]  J. Doudna,et al.  The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 , 2014, Science.

[24]  G. Vergnaud,et al.  CRISPR elements in Yersinia pestis acquire new repeats by preferential uptake of bacteriophage DNA, and provide additional tools for evolutionary studies. , 2005, Microbiology.

[25]  Luke A. Gilbert,et al.  Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-Guided Platform for Sequence-Specific Control of Gene Expression , 2013, Cell.

[26]  Feng Gu,et al.  Comparison of non-canonical PAMs for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated DNA cleavage in human cells , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[27]  J. García-Martínez,et al.  Intervening Sequences of Regularly Spaced Prokaryotic Repeats Derive from Foreign Genetic Elements , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[28]  Erik J. Sontheimer,et al.  Self vs. non-self discrimination during CRISPR RNA-directed immunity , 2009, Nature.