Biomass District Energy Trigeneration Systems: Emissions Reduction and Financial Impact

Biomass cogeneration is widely used for district heating applications in central and northern Europe. Biomass trigeneration on the other hand, constitutes an innovative renewable energy application. In this work, an approved United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change baseline methodology has been extended to allow the examination of biomass trigeneration applications. The methodology is applied to a case study in Greece to investigate various environmental and financial aspects of this type of applications. The results suggest that trigeneration may lead to significant emissions reduction compared to using fossil fuels or even biomass cogeneration and electricity generation. The emissions reduction achieved may be materialized into a considerable revenue stream for the project, if traded through a trading mechanism such as the European Union Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading Scheme. A sensitivity analysis has been performed to compensate for the high volatility of the emission allowances’ value and the immaturity of the EU Trading Scheme, which prevent a reliable estimation of the related revenue. The work concludes that emission allowances trading may develop into one of the major revenue streams of biomass trigeneration projects, significantly increasing their financial yield and attractiveness. The impact on the yield is significant even for low future values of emission allowances and could become the main income revenue source of such projects, if emission allowances increase their value substantially. The application of trigeneration for district energy proves to lead to increased environmental and financial benefits compared to the cogeneration or electricity generation cases.

[1]  László Szabó,et al.  Technological prospects and CO2 emission trading analyses in the iron and steel industry: A global model , 2005 .

[2]  G. Forsberg Biomass energy transport: Analysis of bioenergy transport chains using life cycle inventory method , 2000 .

[3]  Louise Trygg,et al.  European perspective on absorption cooling in a combined heat and power system - A case study of energy utility and industries in Sweden , 2007 .

[4]  Catarina Sternhufvud,et al.  CO2-emission reduction costs for petroleum refineries in Sweden , 2008 .

[5]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Concerns about climate change and the role of fossil fuel use , 2001 .

[6]  Zuzana Chladná,et al.  Determination of optimal rotation period under stochastic wood and carbon prices , 2007 .

[7]  Economics Assessment Panel,et al.  IPCC/TEAP special report on safeguarding the ozone layer and the global climate system : issues related to hydrofluorocarbons and perfluorocarbons , 2005 .

[8]  W. Huisman,et al.  Costs of supply chains of Miscanthus giganteus , 1997 .

[9]  Catarina Sternhufvud,et al.  CO2 emission reduction costs for iron ore-based steelmaking in Sweden , 2008 .

[10]  Hanif D. Sherali,et al.  A linear programming approach for designing a herbaceous biomass delivery system , 1997 .

[11]  ZhongXiang Zhang,et al.  Estimating the size of the potential market for the Kyoto flexibility mechanisms , 1999 .

[12]  Edwin Woerdman,et al.  Implementing the Kyoto protocol: why JI and CDM show more promise than international emissions trading , 2000 .

[13]  R. Brännlund,et al.  Swedish industry and Kyoto—An assessment of the effects of the European CO2 emission trading system , 2007 .

[14]  M. Rathmann,et al.  Do support systems for RES-E reduce EU-ETS-driven electricity prices? , 2007 .

[15]  Urs Springer The Market for Tradable GHG Permits under the Kyoto Protocol: A Survey of Model Studies , 2002 .

[16]  Ram M. Shrestha,et al.  Economics of clean development mechanism power projects under alternative approaches for setting baseline emissions , 2004 .

[17]  Urs Springer,et al.  Estimating the price of tradable permits for greenhouse gas emissions in 2008–12 , 2004 .

[18]  A. Rentizelas,et al.  Effect of greenhouse gas emissions trading on investment decisions for biomass-to-energy production , 2006 .

[19]  E. Hughes,et al.  Biomass cofiring: economics, policy and opportunities. , 2000 .

[20]  The Long Timescales of Human-Caused Climate Warming: Further Challenges for the Global Policy Process , 2005 .