Assessment of the Environmental Advantages and Drawbacks of Existing and Emerging Polymers Recovery Processes

The report analyses the technical and environmental potential of various plastic recovery schemes, as well as assessing the possibilities for environmentally favourable existing and emerging processes to enter the market. Quality and quantity of plastic waste streams are estimated for 2015. For this purpose the six waste categories packaging, vehicles, electronic equipment, agriculture, municipal waste, and construction are analysed in detail. Existing plastic recovery technologies are analysed with regards to their environmental performance. As a result, the recovery technology mix for different scenarios is calculated which best achieves the objective of environmental sustainability. The mission of the JRC is to provide customer-driven scientific and technical support for the conception, development, implementation and monitoring of EU policies. As a service of the European Commission, the JRC functions as a reference centre of science and technology for the Union. Close to the policy-making process, it serves the common interest of the Member States, while being independent of special interests, whether private or national. LF-N A -2939-E N -C

[1]  Stefan Speck,et al.  Waste management policies in Central and Eastern European countries: current policies and trends , 2001 .

[2]  Stefanie Hellweg Time- and site-dependent life cycle assessment of thermal waste treatment processes , 2001 .

[3]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  LIFE CYCLE DESIGN OF A FUEL TANK SYSTEM. , 1998 .

[4]  Hartmut Stahl,et al.  Recovery Options for Plastic Parts from End-of-Life Vehicles: an Eco-Efficiency Assessment , 2003 .

[5]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Time- and site-dependent life cycle assessment of thermal waste treatment processes , 2001 .

[6]  Ferdinand Kleppmann,et al.  Confederation of European Waste to Energy Plants - CEWEP , 2003 .

[7]  Uwe Fritsche,et al.  Comparison of Plastic Packaging Waste Management Options: Feedstock Recycling versus Energy Recovery in Germany , 2001 .

[8]  Sumio Yamada,et al.  Thermoselect waste gasification and reforming process , 2004 .

[9]  Carmela Sica,et al.  P. Picuno and C. Sica. “Mechanical and Spectroradiometrical Characteristics of Agricultural Recycled Plastic Films”. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR , 2004 .

[10]  Carmela Sica,et al.  Mechanical and Spectroradiometrical Characteristics of Agricultural Plastic Films , 2004 .

[11]  Ndue Kanari,et al.  End-of-life vehicle recycling in the european union , 2003 .

[12]  Christian Fischer,et al.  Household and municipal waste: Comparability of data in EEA member countries , 2000 .

[13]  Atsushi Watanabe,et al.  Recycling of Waste Plastic Packaging in a Blast Furnace System , 2001 .

[14]  David P. Serrano,et al.  Feedstock recycling of plastic wastes , 1999 .

[15]  George Marsh,et al.  Next step for automotive materials , 2003 .

[16]  Joseph A. Grande Barrier bottle technologies square off , 2005 .

[17]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Material efficiency improvement for European packaging in the period 2000 - 2020 , 1998 .

[18]  Sami Tuhkanen,et al.  Integrated cost-effectiveness analysis of greenhouse gas emission abatement: The case of Finland , 1999 .

[19]  Julian Parfitt Analysis of household waste composition and factors driving waste increases , 2002 .