Hybrid T-Helper Cells: Stabilizing the Moderate Center in a Polarized System

Polarization of cell phenotypes, a common strategy to achieve cell type diversity in metazoa, results from binary cell-fate decisions in the branching pedigree of development. Such “either-or” fate decisions are controlled by two opposing cell fate-determining transcription factors. Each of the two distinct “master regulators” promotes differentiation of its respective sister lineage. But they also suppress one other, leading to their mutually exclusive expression in the two ensuing lineages. Thus, promiscuous coexistence of the antagonist regulators in the same cell, the hallmark of the common “undecided” progenitor of two sister lineages, is considered unstable. This antagonism ensures robust polarization into two discretely distinct cell types. But now the immune system's T-helper (Th) cells and their two canonical subtypes, Th1 and Th2 cells, tell a different story, as revealed in three papers recently published in PLOS Biology. The intermediate state that co-expresses the two opposing master regulators of the Th1 and Th2 subtypes, T-bet and Gata3, is highly stable and is not necessarily an undecided precursor. Instead, the Th1/Th2 hybrid cell is a robust new type with properties of both Th1 and Th2 cells. These hybrid cells are functionally active and possess the benefit of moderation: self-limitation of effector T cell function to prevent excessive inflammation, a permanent risk in host defense that can cause tissue damage or autoimmunity. Gene regulatory network analysis suggests that stabilization of the intermediate center in a polarizing system can be achieved by minor tweaking of the architecture of the mutual suppression gene circuit, and thus is a design option readily available to evolution.

[1]  J. Abrams,et al.  Simultaneous production of IL-2, IL-4, and IFN-gamma by activated human CD4+ and CD8+ T cell clones. , 1988, Journal of immunology.

[2]  Sui Huang,et al.  Bifurcation dynamics in lineage-commitment in bipotent progenitor cells. , 2007, Developmental biology.

[3]  T. Graf,et al.  Heterogeneity of embryonic and adult stem cells. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[4]  Sui Huang,et al.  Understanding gene circuits at cell-fate branch points for rational cell reprogramming. , 2011, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[5]  Thomas Höfer,et al.  Stable T-bet+GATA-3+ Th1/Th2 Hybrid Cells Arise In Vivo, Can Develop Directly from Naive Precursors, and Limit Immunopathologic Inflammation , 2013, PLoS biology.

[6]  Sui Huang,et al.  The potential landscape of genetic circuits imposes the arrow of time in stem cell differentiation. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[7]  T. Mosmann,et al.  T helper cytokine patterns: defined subsets, random expression, and external modulation , 2009, Immunologic research.

[8]  Graham M. Lord,et al.  T-bet and GATA3 orchestrate Th1 and Th2 differentiation through lineage-specific targeting of distal regulatory elements , 2012, Nature Communications.

[9]  Zhonghuai Hou,et al.  Small-number effects: a third stable state in a genetic bistable toggle switch. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[10]  S. Gould,et al.  The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[11]  J. Monod,et al.  Teleonomic mechanisms in cellular metabolism, growth, and differentiation. , 1961, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[12]  J. Mcghee The World of Th1/Th2 Subsets: First Proof , 2005, The Journal of Immunology.

[13]  Fraser McBlane,et al.  Molecular Signatures of Self-Renewal, Differentiation, and Lineage Choice in Multipotential Hemopoietic Progenitor Cells In Vitro , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[14]  Alexander van Oudenaarden,et al.  Stochastic Cytokine Expression Induces Mixed T Helper Cell States , 2013, PLoS biology.

[15]  J. Collins,et al.  Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli , 2000, Nature.

[16]  Sui Huang,et al.  Back to the biology in systems biology: what can we learn from biomolecular networks? , 2004, Briefings in functional genomics & proteomics.

[17]  R. Coffman,et al.  Two types of murine helper T cell clone. I. Definition according to profiles of lymphokine activities and secreted proteins. , 1986, Journal of immunology.

[18]  Fabian J Theis,et al.  Stability and multiattractor dynamics of a toggle switch based on a two-stage model of stochastic gene expression. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[19]  W. J. Hamilton,et al.  PRINCIPLES OF EMBRYOLOGY , 1956 .

[20]  Andreas Radbruch,et al.  Interferons direct Th2 cell reprogramming to generate a stable GATA-3(+)T-bet(+) cell subset with combined Th2 and Th1 cell functions. , 2010, Immunity.

[21]  Ingo Roeder,et al.  Towards an understanding of lineage specification in hematopoietic stem cells: a mathematical model for the interaction of transcription factors GATA-1 and PU.1. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[22]  Sui Huang Reprogramming cell fates: reconciling rarity with robustness , 2009, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[23]  R. Coffman,et al.  Pillars Article: Two Types of Murine Helper T Cell Clone. I. Definition According to Profiles of Lymphokine Activities and Secreted Proteins. J. Immunol., 1986, 136: 2348–2357. , 2005 .

[24]  E. Ben-Jacob,et al.  Tristability in cancer-associated microRNA-TF chimera toggle switch. , 2013, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[25]  S A Kauffman,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of a simple gene network yields new evolutionary insights. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  Xi C. He,et al.  Transcriptional accessibility for genes of multiple tissues and hematopoietic lineages is hierarchically controlled during early hematopoiesis. , 2003, Blood.

[27]  Kate Smith-Miles,et al.  Mathematical modelling of stem cell differentiation: the PU.1–GATA-1 interaction , 2012, Journal of mathematical biology.

[28]  M. Greaves,et al.  Multilineage gene expression precedes commitment in the hemopoietic system. , 1997, Genes & development.

[29]  Sui Huang,et al.  Systems biology of stem cells: three useful perspectives to help overcome the paradigm of linear pathways , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  Ilya Shmulevich,et al.  Gene pair signatures in cell type transcriptomes reveal lineage control , 2013, Nature Methods.

[31]  Erik Aurell,et al.  Quasi-potential landscape in complex multi-stable systems , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[32]  Denis Guthleben,et al.  Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) , 2014 .

[33]  Julianne D. Halley,et al.  A General Model for Binary Cell Fate Decision Gene Circuits with Degeneracy: Indeterminacy and Switch Behavior in the Absence of Cooperativity , 2011, PloS one.

[34]  M. Pascual Understanding nonlinear dynamics , 1996 .

[35]  U. Alon Biological Networks: The Tinkerer as an Engineer , 2003, Science.

[36]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Mapping Differentiation under Mixed Culture Conditions Reveals a Tunable Continuum of T Cell Fates , 2013, PLoS biology.

[37]  A. Wilkins Between “design” and “bricolage”: Genetic networks, levels of selection, and adaptive evolution , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Samantha A. Morris,et al.  Making a firm decision: multifaceted regulation of cell fate in the early mouse embryo , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[39]  R. Solé,et al.  Convergent Evolutionary Paths in Biological and Technological Networks , 2011, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[40]  M. Croft,et al.  Generation, persistence, and modulation of Th0 effector cells: role of autocrine IL-4 and IFN-gamma. , 1998, Journal of immunology.

[41]  R. Coffman,et al.  Two types of murine helper T cell clone. I. Definition according to profiles of lymphokine activities and secreted proteins. 1986. , 2005, Journal of immunology.

[42]  W. Paul,et al.  Differentiation of effector CD4 T cell populations (*). , 2010, Annual review of immunology.

[43]  Otto X. Cordero,et al.  Feed-forward loop circuits as a side effect of genome evolution. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.