Comparative Evaluation of an Eulerian CFD and Gaussian Plume Models Based on Prairie Grass Dispersion Experiment

Abstract A theoretical and statistical comparison of a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model with two Gaussian plume models is proposed on the Prairie Grass data field experiment for neutral conditions, using both maximum arcwise concentrations and spatially paired observations. In theory, it is impossible to have the same near-source behavior with the Eulerian CFD code as with the Gaussian plume models. The former presents the inability to account for the dependence of the turbulent diffusivity to the distance from the source, contrary to plume models for which this dependence is fitted to observations. The study described herein looks at the practical implications of these theoretical differences by comparing the two different types of models on a flat-terrain case, a situation favoring Gaussian models. The results herein show that the Eulerian CFD model gives acceptable results, both for arc-maximum concentrations and spatially paired observations. Indeed, the statistical performan...

[1]  Steven R. Hanna,et al.  Use of the Kit Fox field data to analyze dense gas dispersion modeling issues , 2001 .

[2]  Rainald Löhner,et al.  Comparisons of model simulations with observations of mean flow and turbulence within simple obstacle arrays , 2002 .

[3]  Eugene Yee,et al.  Concentration Fluctuation Measurements in a Plume Dispersing Through a Regular Array of Obstacles , 2004 .

[4]  D. H. Slade,et al.  DIFFUSION AND TRANSPORT EXPERIMENTS. , 1968 .

[5]  R. Pielke Mesoscale Meteorological Modeling , 1984 .

[6]  D. Carruthers,et al.  Comparisons between FLUENT and ADMS for atmospheric dispersion modelling , 2004 .

[7]  S. Arya Air Pollution Meteorology and Dispersion , 1998 .

[8]  Maya Milliez,et al.  Numerical simulations of pollutant dispersion in an idealized urban area, for different meteorological conditions , 2007 .

[9]  Alan H. Huber Development and applications of CFD simulations in support of air quality studies involving buildings , 2004 .

[10]  Olav R. Hansen,et al.  FLACS CFD air quality model performance evaluation with Kit Fox, MUST, Prairie Grass, and EMU observations , 2004 .

[11]  F. Archambeau,et al.  Code Saturne: A Finite Volume Code for the computation of turbulent incompressible flows - Industrial Applications , 2004 .

[12]  B. Launder,et al.  The numerical computation of turbulent flows , 1990 .

[13]  S. B. Carpenter,et al.  Principal Plume Dispersion Models: TVA Power Plants , 1971 .

[14]  S. Hanna,et al.  Air quality model performance evaluation , 2004 .

[15]  J. Louis A parametric model of vertical eddy fluxes in the atmosphere , 1979 .

[16]  Steven R. Hanna,et al.  Hazardous gas model evaluation with field observations , 1993 .

[17]  E. F. Bradley,et al.  Flux-Profile Relationships in the Atmospheric Surface Layer , 1971 .

[18]  M. Barad,et al.  PROJECT PRAIRIE GRASS, A FIELD PROGRAM IN DIFFUSION. VOLUME II , 1958 .