Does species diversity limit productivity in natural grassland communities?

Theoretical analyses and experimental studies of synthesized assemblages indicate that under particular circumstances species diversity can enhance community productivity through niche complementarity. It remains unclear whether this process has important effects in mature natural ecosystems where competitive feedbacks and complex environmental influences affect diversity-productivity relationships. In this study, we evaluated diversity-productivity relationships while statistically controlling for environmental influences in 12 natural grassland ecosystems. Because diversity-productivity relationships are conspicuously nonlinear, we developed a nonlinear structural equation modeling (SEM) methodology to separate the effects of diversity on productivity from the effects of productivity on diversity. Meta-analysis was used to summarize the SEM findings across studies. While competitive effects were readily detected, enhancement of production by diversity was not. These results suggest that the influence of small-scale diversity on productivity in mature natural systems is a weak force, both in absolute terms and relative to the effects of other controls on productivity.

[1]  James B. Grace,et al.  A Structural Equation Model of Plant Species Richness and Its Application to a Coastal Wetland , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[2]  M. Huston,et al.  Evaluating the Relative Strengths of Biotic Versus Abiotic Controls on Ecosystem Processes , 2002 .

[3]  F. Chapin,et al.  Consequences of changing biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[4]  J. Coleman,et al.  Interpreting phenotypic variation in plants. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[5]  Moshe Shachak,et al.  Linking Community and Ecosystem Processes: The Role of Minor Species , 2006, Ecosystems.

[6]  F. Chapin,et al.  EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE , 2005 .

[7]  M. H. Stevens.  Placing local plant species richness in the context of environmental drivers of metacommunity richness , 2006 .

[8]  David A. Wardle,et al.  Effects of species and functional group loss on island ecosystem properties , 2005, Nature.

[9]  J. P. Grime.  Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function: The Debate Deepens , 1997, Science.

[10]  Bill Shipley,et al.  Cause and Correlation in Biology: A User''s Guide to Path Analysis , 2016 .

[11]  J. Molofsky,et al.  A novel theory to explain species diversity in landscapes: positive frequency dependence and habitat suitability , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  H. Hillebrand.  Meta‐analysis in Ecology , 2008 .

[13]  L. Aarssen.  High productivity in grassland ecosystems : effected by species diversity or productive species ? , 1997 .

[14]  Richard Field,et al.  Predictions and tests of climate‐based hypotheses of broad‐scale variation in taxonomic richness , 2004 .

[15]  B. Wilsey,et al.  Do species evenness and plant density influence the magnitude of selection and complementarity effects in annual plant species mixtures , 2003 .

[16]  Michael A. Huston,et al.  Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity , 1997, Oecologia.

[17]  J. P. Grime,et al.  No consistent effect of plant diversity on productivity. , 2000, Science.

[18]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Spatial scale dictates the productivity–biodiversity relationship , 2002, Nature.

[19]  James B. Grace,et al.  The factors controlling species density in herbaceous plant communities: an assessment , 1999 .

[20]  Richard Field,et al.  ENERGY, WATER, AND BROAD‐SCALE GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS OF SPECIES RICHNESS , 2003 .

[21]  F. Woodward,et al.  ECOSYSTEM EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY MANIPULATIONS IN EUROPEAN GRASSLANDS , 2005 .

[22]  Shahid Naeem,et al.  ECOSYSTEM CONSEQUENCES OF BIODIVERSITY LOSS: THE EVOLUTION OF A PARADIGM , 2002 .

[23]  Amy E. Miller,et al.  The consequence of species loss on ecosystem nitrogen cycling depends on community compensation , 2006, Oecologia.

[24]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects , 1998 .

[25]  James B. Grace,et al.  The relationship between species richness and community biomass: the importance of environmental variables. , 1994 .

[26]  D. Srivastava,et al.  Biodiversity-Ecosystem Function Research: Is It Relevant to Conservation? , 2005 .

[27]  Nina Buchmann,et al.  Effects of plant diversity, community composition and environmental parameters on productivity in montane European grasslands , 2005, Oecologia.

[28]  M. Willig,et al.  Patterns of species density and productivity at different spatial scales in herbaceous plant communities , 2000 .

[29]  D. R. Heise.  Employing Nominal Variables, Induced Variables, and Block Variables in Path Analyses , 1972 .

[30]  A. Knapp,et al.  Dominance not richness determines invasibility of tallgrass prairie. , 2004 .

[31]  J. Fridley.  The influence of species diversity on ecosystem productivity: how, where, and why? , 2001 .

[32]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges , 2001, Science.

[33]  T. L. Dickson,et al.  Propagule pools mediate community assembly and diversity‐ecosystem regulation along a grassland productivity gradient , 2004 .

[34]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  MetaWin: Statistical Software for Meta-analysis with Resampling Tests , 1997 .

[35]  Nina Buchmann,et al.  Overyielding in experimental grassland communities - irrespective of species pool or spatial scale , 2005 .

[36]  Pereira,et al.  Plant diversity and productivity experiments in european grasslands , 1999, Science.

[37]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Biodiversity, ecosystem function and plant traits in mature and immature plant communities , 2005 .

[38]  M. Willig,et al.  The Relationship Between Productivity and Species Richness , 1999 .

[39]  Species richness along multiple gradients: testing a general multivariate model in oak savannas , 2003 .

[40]  D. Goldberg,et al.  Density dependence in an annual plant community: variation among life history stages , 2001 .

[41]  James B. Grace,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling and Natural Systems , 2006 .

[42]  P. Reich,et al.  Diversity and Productivity in a Long-Term Grassland Experiment , 2001, Science.

[43]  A. Knapp,et al.  Dominant species maintain ecosystem function with non‐random species loss , 2003 .

[44]  James B. Grace,et al.  REGIONAL AND LOCAL SPECIES RICHNESS IN AN INSULAR ENVIRONMENT: SERPENTINE PLANTS IN CALIFORNIA , 2006 .

[45]  Katherine L. Gross,et al.  WHAT IS THE OBSERVED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPECIES RICHNESS AND PRODUCTIVITY , 2001 .

[46]  K. Bollen,et al.  Interpreting the Results from Multiple Regression and Structural Equation Models , 2005 .

[47]  M. Willig,et al.  Understanding Environmental Complexity through a Distributed Knowledge Network , 2004 .

[48]  M. Loreau,et al.  Does complementary resource use enhance ecosystem functioning? A model of light competition in plant communities. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[49]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Representing general theoretical concepts in structural equation models: the role of composite variables , 2008, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.