Using peer assessment of fieldwork to enhance students’ practical training

Fieldwork training is a key component of several practical disciplines. In this study, students’ peer assessment of fieldwork is explored as a method to improve their practical training. Peer assessment theories are first discussed. A framework for peer assessment of fieldwork is proposed, and the steps taken for preparation of students for this task are discussed. A developed marking, feedback and moderation tool of assessment are presented. Application of peer assessment in the field was investigated over a period of two years in one undergraduate unit in the geospatial discipline as an example. Reliability of peer assessment was estimated by measuring the difference between assessments carried out by groups of peer assessors, and its validity was measured by comparing students’ marks with those given by tutors. Results show that students have gained from the peer assessment process, mainly as a formative form of assessment, by better understanding and endeavouring to achieve the objectives of field tasks. Tutors use differences among assessments made by groups of students compared to tutors’ assessments to identify field components that need better explanation of their content and assessment criteria.

[1]  D. Sadler.  Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems , 1989 .

[2]  Pencheon,et al.  Leadership and motivation , 2000, BMJ.

[3]  Chet Robie,et al.  Applying the social relations model to self and peer evaluations , 2001 .

[4]  David Carless,et al.  Learning‐oriented assessment: conceptual bases and practical implications , 2003 .

[5]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Robert J. Armstrong.  Developing and Writing Behavioral Objectives. , 1970 .

[7]  Nancy Falchikov,et al.  Improving Assessment through Student Involvement: Practical Solutions for Aiding Learning in Higher and Further Education , 2005 .

[8]  Catherine McLoughlin,et al.  A question of balance: using self and peer assessment effectively in teamwork , 2002, ASCILITE.

[9]  Mantz Yorke.  Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice , 2003 .

[10]  Geoffrey T. Crisp.  The e-Assessment Handbook , 2007 .

[11]  David L. Mothersbaugh,et al.  Peer versus Self Assessment of Oral Business Presentation Performance , 2001 .

[12]  David A. F. Haaga,et al.  Peer Review of Term Papers in Graduate Psychology Courses , 1993 .

[13]  Robert G. Isaac,et al.  Leadership and Motivation: The Effective Application of Expectancy Theory , 2001 .

[14]  B. Friedman,et al.  An Expectancy Theory Motivation Approach to Peer Assessment , 2008 .

[15]  Jo McKenzie,et al.  SPARK, a confidential web-based template for self and peer assessment of student teamwork: benefits of evaluating across different subjects , 2002, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[16]  P. Sadler,et al.  The Impact of Self- and Peer-Grading on Student Learning , 2006 .

[17]  Tony Snow,et al.  Blended learning in higher education: Current and future challenges in surveying education , 2013 .

[18]  W. Rod Cullen,et al.  Relationships between student characteristics and self‐, peer and tutor evaluations of oral presentations , 2008 .

[19]  Glyn Thomas,et al.  Using self- and peer-assessment to enhance students’ future-learning in higher education. , 2011, Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice.

[20]  John Adair.  Leadership and Motivation , 2012 .

[21]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives , 2006 .

[22]  Alain Jaillet,et al.  Can Online Peer Assessment be Trusted? , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[23]  N. Falchikov.  The place of peers in learning and assessment , 2007 .

[24]  Martin Valcke,et al.  How effective are self- and peer assessment of oral presentation skills compared with teachers’ assessments? , 2012 .

[25]  Kathleen Montgomery,et al.  Classroom Rubrics: Systematizing What Teachers Do Naturally , 2000 .

[26]  Shelley Burgin,et al.  Pedagogical Approaches that Facilitate Writing in Postgraduate Research Candidature in Science and Technology , 2011, Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice.

[27]  Robert L. Brennan,et al.  An Essay on the History and Future of Reliability from the Perspective of Replications , 2001 .

[28]  Phil Davies,et al.  Closing the communications loop on the computerized peer-assessment of essays , 2003 .

[29]  John B. Biggs,et al.  Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does , 1999 .

[30]  Ibrahim S. Al-fallay.  The Role of Some Selected Psychological and Personality Traits of the Rater in the Accuracy of Self- and Peer-Assessment. , 2004 .

[31]  Gavin T. L. Brown.  Student peer assessment , 2015 .

[32]  N. Falchikov,et al.  Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks , 2000 .