Electronic magnification and perceived contrast of video

Electronic magnification of an image results in a decrease in its perceived contrast. The decrease in perceived contrast could be due to a perceived blur or to limited sampling of the range of contrasts in the original image. We measured the effect on perceived contrast of magnification in two contexts: either a small video was enlarged to fill a larger area, or a portion of a larger video was enlarged to fill the same area as the original. Subjects attenuated the source video contrast to match the perceived contrast of the magnified videos, with the effect increasing with magnification and decreasing with viewing distance. These effects are consistent with expectations based on both the contrast statistics of natural images and the contrast sensitivity of the human visual system. We demonstrate that local regions within videos usually have lower physical contrast than the whole, and that this difference accounts for a minor part of the perceived differences. Instead, visibility of 'missing content' (blur) in a video is misinterpreted as a decrease in contrast. We detail how the effects of magnification on perceived contrast can be measured while avoiding confounding factors.

[1]  S. Dakin,et al.  Critical band masking in optic flow , 2005, Network.

[2]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Modern Image Quality Assessment , 2006, Modern Image Quality Assessment.

[3]  R. Watt,et al.  The recognition and representation of edge blur: Evidence for spatial primitives in human vision , 1983, Vision Research.

[4]  Gang Luo,et al.  37.3: Dynamic Magnification of Video for People with Visual Impairment , 2003 .

[5]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Blurred edges look faint, and faint edges look sharp: The effect of a gradient threshold in a multi-scale edge coding model , 2007, Vision Research.

[6]  E. Peli In search of a contrast metric: Matching the perceived contrast of gabor patches at different phases and bandwidths , 1997, Vision Research.

[7]  P. Bex,et al.  Spatial frequency, phase, and the contrast of natural images. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[8]  A. Reeves,et al.  Effect of luminance on suprathreshold contrast perception. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[9]  Eli Peli,et al.  24.1: Measuring the Perceived Contrast of Natural Images , 2011 .

[10]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[11]  M. Cannon,et al.  A transducer model for contrast perception. , 1991, Vision research.

[12]  Mark W. Cannon,et al.  A transducer model for contrast perceptio , 1991, Vision Research.

[13]  E. Peli,et al.  Contrast sensitivity function and image discrimination. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[14]  J A Solomon,et al.  Texture interactions determine perceived contrast , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[16]  M. Angela Sasse,et al.  The kindest cut: enhancing the user experience of mobile tv through adequate zooming , 2007, ACM Multimedia.

[17]  Jacques A. J. Roufs,et al.  Brightness Contrast And Sharpness, Interactive Factors In Perceptual Image Quality , 1989, Photonics West - Lasers and Applications in Science and Engineering.

[18]  M. Bach,et al.  Less is more: subjective detailedness depends on stimulus size. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[19]  Ast Olga,et al.  Visualization of space and fragments of the installation. artistic action “Field of Vision”, series “Space Traps” , 2007 .

[20]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  Eli Peli,et al.  Development and Evaluation of Vision Multiplexing Devices for Vision Impairments , 2009, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools.

[22]  Michael Elad,et al.  Advances and challenges in super‐resolution , 2004, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..