Residential location, commuting and non-work travel in two urban areas of different size and with different center structures

Abstract There is an extensive literature on relationships between the built environment and travel, but the vast majority of such studies rely solely on statistical analyses of available travel survey data, with limited possibilities for demonstrating causality. This article presents findings from a methodologically novel study drawing on a combination of a tailor-made questionnaire survey and in-depth qualitative interviews, including cross-sectional as well as longitudinal analyses. Our mixed-methods approach offers stronger evidence of causal influences than in most previous studies on the built environment and travel. We illuminate such relationships in two metropolitan areas differing considerably in their size and urban structure: the relatively monocentric Norwegian capital Oslo and the smaller, predominantly polycentric Stavanger area. The study encompasses travel distances and modes for both commuting and intra-metropolitan non-work purposes. The paper thus offers a comparison of the influences of built environment characteristics on travel across metropolitan contexts as well as for different travel purposes.

[1]  Petter Næss.  Urban Structure Matters: Residential Location, Car Dependence and Travel Behaviour , 2006 .

[2]  M. Kwan,et al.  Scale and accessibility: Implications for the analysis of land use-travel interaction , 2008 .

[3]  M. Dijst,et al.  Urban Form and Travel Behaviour: Micro-level Household Attributes and Residential Context , 2002 .

[4]  C. Ellis.  The New Urbanism: Critiques and Rebuttals , 2002 .

[5]  Arlie Russell Hochschild,et al.  The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work , 1997 .

[6]  W. Alonso.  Location And Land Use , 1964 .

[7]  Peter Newman,et al.  Cities and automobile dependence , 1993 .

[8]  W. Marshall,et al.  ‘New’ versus ‘Old’ Urbanism: A comparative analysis of travel behavior in large-scale New Urbanist communities and older, more established neighborhoods in Denver, Colorado , 2014 .

[9]  M.J.H. Mogridge.  Transport, Land Use and Energy Interaction , 1985 .

[10]  Michael Fox,et al.  Transport planning and the human activity approach , 1995 .

[11]  Petter Næss,et al.  Built Environment, Causality and Travel , 2015 .

[12]  Erik Elldér,et al.  Residential location and daily travel distances: the influence of trip purpose , 2014 .

[13]  L. Woods,et al.  The influence of urban form on car travel following residential relocation: a current and retrospective study in Scottish urban areas , 2014 .

[14]  Yingling Fan,et al.  Exploring the Influences of Density on Travel Behavior Using Propensity Score Matching , 2012 .

[15]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment , 2010 .

[16]  R. Kitamura,et al.  A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area , 1997 .

[17]  Susan L Handy.  Thoughts on the Meaning of Mark Stevens’s Meta-Analysis , 2017 .

[18]  Petter Næss.  Residential location affects travel behavior: but how and why? the case of Copenhagen metropolitan area , 2005 .

[19]  The impacts of job and household decentralization on commuting distances and travel modes Experiences from the Copenhagen region and other Nordic urban areas , 2007 .

[20]  Xinyu Cao,et al.  Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: A focus on methodologies , 2008 .

[21]  Anil Namdeo,et al.  Growing Cities Sustainably , 2012 .

[22]  Ole B. Jensen,et al.  Urban structure matters, even in a small town , 2004 .

[23]  J. Kenworthy,et al.  Differences in transport and land use in thirteen comparable Australian, American, Canadian and European cities between 1995/6 to 2005/6 and their implications for more sustainable transport , 2011 .

[24]  D. Levinson,et al.  The Rational Locator: Why Travel Times Have Remained Stable , 1994 .

[25]  Berth Danermark,et al.  Explaining Society , 2001 .

[26]  Thomas Sick Nielsen,et al.  Do green areas affect health? Results from a Danish survey on the use of green areas and health indicators. , 2007, Health & place.

[27]  Arvid Strand,et al.  Oslo's Farewell to Urban Sprawl , 2011 .

[28]  K. Kockelman,et al.  Self-Selection in Home Choice , 2008 .

[29]  Petter Næss.  Tempest in a teapot: The exaggerated problem of transport-related residential self-selection as a source of error in empirical studies , 2014 .

[30]  Julien Grunfelder,et al.  Commuting behaviour and urban form: a longitudinal study of a polycentric urban region in Denmark , 2012 .

[31]  Petter Naess,et al.  Workplace Location, Modal Split and Energy Use for Commuting Trips , 1996 .

[32]  Jeffrey Kenworthy,et al.  Urban passenger transport energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions: a global review and assessment of some reduction strategies , 2015 .

[33]  Erling Holden.  Achieving Sustainable Mobility: Everyday and Leisure-time Travel in the EU , 2007 .

[34]  Ole B. Jensen,et al.  Urban land use, mobility and theory of science: exploring the potential for critical realism in empirical research , 2002 .

[35]  Marlon G. Boarnet,et al.  Land Use, Urban Design, and Non-Work Travel: Reproducing for Portland, Oregon, Empirical Tests from other Urban Areas , 1999 .

[36]  C. Zegras.  The Built Environment and Motor Vehicle Ownership and Use: Evidence from Santiago de Chile , 2010 .

[37]  Petter Næss.  Residential Location, Travel, and Energy Use in the Hangzhou Metropolitan Area , 2010 .

[38]  M. Jun,et al.  THE COMMUTING PARADOX: EVIDENCE FROM THE TOP TWENTY , 1991 .

[39]  Harpa Stefánsdóttir.  The role of urban atmosphere for non-work activity locations , 2018 .

[40]  J. Scheiner.  Residential self-selection in travel behavior: Towards an integration into mobility biographies , 2014 .

[41]  P. Gordon,et al.  Spatial structure and travel: trends in commuting and non-commuting travels in US metropolitan areas , 2015 .

[42]  B. Berry,et al.  Central places in Southern Germany , 1967 .

[43]  G. Giuliano,et al.  Another Look at Travel Patterns and Urban Form: The US and Great Britain , 2003 .

[44]  Kees Maat,et al.  Multi-Period Research Designs for Causal Inference between the Built Environment and Travel Behavior , 2015 .

[45]  Petter Næss,et al.  Travelling Distances, Modal Split and Transportation Energy in Thirty Residential Areas in Oslo , 1995 .

[46]  David Banister,et al.  New household location and the commute to work: changes over time , 2015 .

[47]  Petter Næss,et al.  Urban form and travel behavior: experience from a Nordic context , 2012 .

[48]  Karin Tillberg.  Barnfamiljers dagliga fritidsresor i bilsamhället - ett tidspussel med geografiska och könsmässiga variationer , 2001 .

[49]  Dah Banister,et al.  Reducing travel by design: What happens over time? , 2005 .

[50]  Dimitris Milakis,et al.  Stay local or go regional? Urban form effects on vehicle use at different spatial scales: A theoretical concept and its application to the San Francisco Bay Area , 2015 .

[51]  Petter Næss,et al.  Examining the effects of the built environment on auto ownership in two Norwegian urban regions , 2019, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[52]  Torsten Hägerstrand,et al.  What about people in Regional Science? , 1970 .

[53]  R. Cervero,et al.  Influences of Built Environments on Walking and Cycling: Lessons from Bogotá , 2009 .

[54]  Marlon G. Boarnet.  Travel by design , 2001 .

[55]  Petter Næss,et al.  Residential location, transport rationales and daily-life travel behaviour: The case of Hangzhou Metropolitan Area, China , 2013 .

[56]  Andrew Sayer,et al.  Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach , 1984 .

[57]  Jeffrey Kenworthy,et al.  Gasoline Consumption and Cities: A Comparison of U.S. Cities with a Global Survey , 1989 .

[58]  J Scheiner,et al.  Daily Mobility in Berlin: On 'Inner Unity' and the Explanation of Travel Behaviour , 2005 .

[59]  D. Levinson,et al.  Density and the Journey to Work , 1997, Growth and change.

[60]  D. Milakis,et al.  Relationships between Urban Form and Travel Behaviour in Athens , Greece . A Comparison with Western European and North American Results , 2008 .

[61]  Robert Cervero,et al.  THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND TRAVEL: EVIDENCE FROM THE UNITED STATES , 2003 .

[62]  A. Santos,et al.  Summary of Travel Trends: 2009 National Household Travel Survey , 2011 .

[63]  Mark R. Stevens,et al.  Does Compact Development Make People Drive Less? , 2017 .

[64]  Michael N. Bagley,et al.  The impact of residential neighborhood type on travel behavior: A structural equations modeling approach , 2001 .

[65]  Jeffrey Kenworthy,et al.  Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence , 1999 .

[66]  Xinyu Cao,et al.  Examining the Impacts of Residential Self‐Selection on Travel Behaviour: A Focus on Empirical Findings , 2009 .

[67]  M. Kwan.  The Uncertain Geographic Context Problem , 2012 .

[68]  M. Lewis-Beck.  Applied Regression: An Introduction , 1980 .

[69]  A. Sayer.  Method in Social Science , 1992 .

[70]  S. Handy,et al.  QUALITATIVE METHODS IN TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH , 2003 .

[71]  R. Crane,et al.  Traffic and Sprawl: Evidence from U.S. Commuting, 1985 To 1997* , 2003 .

[72]  M. Archer.  Being Human: The Problem of Agency , 2000 .

[73]  M. Martens.  Adaptive cities in Europe: interrelationships between urban structure, mobility and regional planning strategies , 2006 .

[74]  R. Bhaskar.  Dialectic: The Pulse of Freedom , 1993 .

[75]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Examining The Impacts of Residential Self-Selection on Travel Behavior: Methodologies and Empirical Findings , 2008 .

[76]  宋金平,et al.  美国地理学百年发展脉络分析―基于《Annals of the Association of American Geographers》学术论文的统计分析 , 2007 .

[77]  Petter Næss,et al.  Energy Use for Transportation in 22 Nordic Towns , 1996 .

[78]  Petter Næss,et al.  ‘New urbanism’ or metropolitan-level centralization? A comparison of the influences of metropolitan-level and neighborhood-level urban form characteristics on travel behavior. , 2011 .

[79]  Kees Maat,et al.  Multi-period Research Designs for Identifying Causal Effects of Built Environment Characteristics on Travel Behaviour , 2015 .

[80]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The practice of social research , 1969 .

[81]  P. Gordon,et al.  The influence of metropolitan spatial structure on commuting time , 1989 .

[82]  D. Banister.  Land use and transport , 1998 .

[83]  U. Himmelstrand,et al.  ‘Middle Way’ Sweden at a Cross-Road: Problems, Actors, and Outcomes * , 1978 .

[84]  R. Cervero,et al.  TRAVEL DEMAND AND THE 3DS: DENSITY, DIVERSITY, AND DESIGN , 1997 .

[85]  P. Lloyd,et al.  Location in space: A theoretical approach to economic geography , 1974 .

[86]  Torsten Hägerstraand.  WHAT ABOUT PEOPLE IN REGIONAL SCIENCE , 1970 .

[87]  R. Bhaskar,et al.  The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences , 1979 .

[88]  Marilynn B. Brewer,et al.  Principles and Methods of Social Research , 1986 .

[89]  Petter Næss.  Residential Self‐Selection and Appropriate Control Variables in Land Use: Travel Studies , 2009 .