Cognitive performance during irrelevant speech: Effects of speech intelligibility and office-task characteristics

Cognitive performance during irrelevant speech : effects of speech intelligibility and office-task characteristics

[1]  G. Hitch,et al.  Separate roles for executive and phonological components of working memory in mental arithmetic , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[2]  V Hongisto,et al.  Effects of acoustic environment on work in private office rooms and open-plan offices – longitudinal study during relocation , 2009, Ergonomics.

[3]  E Keskinen,et al.  Performance effects and subjective disturbance of speech in acoustically different office types--a laboratory experiment. , 2009, Indoor air.

[4]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect : Implications for phonological coding in working memory , 1993 .

[5]  S. Hygge,et al.  Open-plan office noise: Cognitive performance and restoration , 2011 .

[6]  W. Ellermeier,et al.  Is level irrelevant in "irrelevant speech"? Effects of loudness, signal-to-noise ratio, and binaural unmasking. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  N. Morris,et al.  Irrelevant speech and serial recall: implications for theories of attention and working memory. , 1992, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[8]  G. Winocur,et al.  Clustering and switching on verbal fluency: the effects of focal frontal- and temporal-lobe lesions , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  Helena Jahncke,et al.  Performance, fatigue and stress in open-plan offices: the effects of noise and restoration on hearing impaired and normal hearing individuals. , 2012, Noise & health.

[10]  Arthur L. Benton,et al.  Word fluency and brain damage , 1967 .

[11]  Esko Keskinen,et al.  Effects of Five Speech Masking Sounds on Performance and Acoustic Satisfaction. Implications for Open-Plan Offices , 2011 .

[12]  Jukka Keränen,et al.  Determination of Acoustical Conditions in Open-Plan Offices : Proposal for New Measurement Method and Target Values , 2009 .

[13]  Valtteri Hongisto,et al.  Experimental comparison between speech transmission index, rapid speech transmission index, and speech intelligibility index. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  B Hagerman,et al.  Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. , 1982, Scandinavian audiology.

[15]  V Hongisto,et al.  A model predicting the effect of speech of varying intelligibility on work performance. , 2005, Indoor air.

[16]  M Naveh-Benjamin,et al.  The Effects of Divided Attention on Encoding and Retrieval Processes: The Resiliency of Retrieval Processes , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[17]  T. Houtgast,et al.  A review of the MTF concept in room acoustics and its use for estimating speech intelligibility in auditoria , 1985 .

[18]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  Category Norms: An Updated and Expanded Version of the Battig and Montague (1969) Norms. , 2004 .

[19]  E Keskinen,et al.  The effect of speech and speech intelligibility on task performance , 2006, Ergonomics.

[20]  N. Cowan.  Attention and Memory: An Integrated Framework , 1995 .

[21]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Cross-modal distraction by background speech: what role for meaning? , 2010, Noise & health.

[22]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Short Article: Syntax and Serial Recall: How Language Supports Short-Term Memory for Order , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Auditory Distraction in Semantic Memory: A Process-Based Approach. , 2008 .

[24]  Patrik Sörqvist,et al.  Working memory capacity modulates habituation rate: Evidence from a cross-modal auditory distraction paradigm , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  M Vorländer,et al.  The impact of background speech varying in intelligibility: Effects on cognitive performance and perceived disturbance , 2008, Ergonomics.