Mechanism and inhibition of saFabI, the enoyl reductase from Staphylococcus aureus.

Approximately one-third of the world's population carries Staphylococcus aureus. The recent emergence of extreme drug resistant strains that are resistant to the "antibiotic of last resort", vancomycin, has caused a further increase in the pressing need to discover new drugs against this organism. The S. aureus enoyl reductase, saFabI, is a validated target for drug discovery. To drive the development of potent and selective saFabI inhibitors, we have studied the mechanism of the enzyme and analyzed the interaction of saFabI with triclosan and two related diphenyl ether inhibitors. Results from kinetic assays reveal that saFabI is NADPH-dependent, and prefers acyl carrier protein substrates carrying fatty acids with long acyl chains. On the basis of product inhibition studies, we propose that the reaction proceeds via an ordered sequential ternary complex, with the ACP substrate binding first, followed by NADPH. The interaction of NADPH with the enzyme has been further explored by site-directed mutagenesis, and residues R40 and K41 have been shown to be involved in determining the specificity of the enzyme for NADPH compared to NADH. Finally, in preliminary inhibition studies, we have shown that triclosan, 5-ethyl-2-phenoxyphenol (EPP), and 5-chloro-2-phenoxyphenol (CPP) are all nanomolar slow-onset inhibitors of saFabI. These compounds inhibit the growth of S. aureus with MIC values of 0.03-0.06 microg/mL. Upon selection for resistance, three novel safabI mutations, A95V, I193S, and F204S, were identified. Strains containing these mutations had MIC values approximately 100-fold larger than that of the wild-type strain, whereas the purified mutant enzymes had K i values 5-3000-fold larger than that of wild-type saFabI. The increase in both MIC and K i values caused by the mutations supports the proposal that saFabI is the intracellular target for the diphenyl ether-based inhibitors.

[1]  K. Kumura,et al.  4-Pyridone derivatives as new inhibitors of bacterial enoyl-ACP reductase FabI. , 2007, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[2]  N. Kaplan,et al.  In Vitro Activity of API-1252, a Novel FabI Inhibitor, against Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis , 2007, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[3]  M. Day,et al.  Small-colony variants: a novel mechanism for triclosan resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. , 2006, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[4]  G. Saunders Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. , 2006, The West Indian medical journal.

[5]  Peter J Tonge,et al.  High affinity InhA inhibitors with activity against drug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. , 2006, ACS chemical biology.

[6]  C. Rock,et al.  Evaluation of Epigallocatechin Gallate and Related Plant Polyphenols as Inhibitors of the FabG and FabI Reductases of Bacterial Type II Fatty-acid Synthase* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  L. L. Ling,et al.  Identification and Characterization of Inhibitors of Bacterial Enoyl-Acyl Carrier Protein Reductase , 2022 .

[8]  P. Tonge,et al.  Inhibition of the bacterial enoyl reductase FabI by triclosan: a structure-reactivity analysis of FabI inhibition by triclosan analogues. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[9]  A. Russell Whither triclosan? , 2004, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[10]  Peter J. Tonge,et al.  The isoniazid-NAD adduct is a slow, tight-binding inhibitor of InhA, the Mycobacterium tuberculosis enoyl reductase: Adduct affinity and drug resistance , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  M. Head,et al.  Defining and Combating the Mechanisms of Triclosan Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus , 2002, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[12]  Martha S. Head,et al.  Discovery of a Novel and Potent Class of FabI-Directed Antibacterial Agents , 2002, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[13]  W. Delano The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System , 2002 .

[14]  F. Lowy,et al.  What determines nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus? , 2001, Trends in microbiology.

[15]  D. D. Jaworski,et al.  Biochemical and genetic characterization of the action of triclosan on Staphylococcus aureus. , 2001, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[16]  Y. Luo,et al.  Enoyl-ACP reductase (FabI) of Haemophilus influenzae: steady-state kinetic mechanism and inhibition by triclosan and hexachlorophene. , 2001, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics.

[17]  P. Brennan,et al.  Expression, purification, and characterization of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis acyl carrier protein, AcpM. , 2001, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[18]  R N Jones,et al.  Survey of infections due to Staphylococcus species: frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates collected in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Europe, and the Western Pacific region for the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997-1999. , 2001, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[19]  R. Heath,et al.  The Enoyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] Reductases FabI and FabL fromBacillus subtilis * , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  Charles O. Rock,et al.  erratum: A triclosan-resistant bacterial enzyme , 2000, Nature.

[21]  R. Heath,et al.  Inhibition of the Staphylococcus aureusNADPH-dependent Enoyl-Acyl Carrier Protein Reductase by Triclosan and Hexachlorophene* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  S. Parikh,et al.  Roles of tyrosine 158 and lysine 165 in the catalytic mechanism of InhA, the enoyl-ACP reductase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[23]  R J Heath,et al.  Mechanism of Triclosan Inhibition of Bacterial Fatty Acid Synthesis* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  M. Pfaller,et al.  Survey of blood stream infections attributable to gram-positive cocci: frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates collected in 1997 in the United States, Canada, and Latin America from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. SENTRY Participants Group. , 1999, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.

[25]  Antoni R. Slabas,et al.  Molecular basis of triclosan activity , 1999, Nature.

[26]  T. Neal,et al.  An assessment of triclosan susceptibility in methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. , 1999, The Journal of hospital infection.

[27]  R. Heath,et al.  Broad Spectrum Antimicrobial Biocides Target the FabI Component of Fatty Acid Synthesis* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[28]  S. Levy,et al.  Triclosan targets lipid synthesis , 1998, Nature.

[29]  H. Humphreys,et al.  Revised guidelines for the control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in hospitals. British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Hospital Infection Society and the Infection Control Nurses Association. , 1998, The Journal of hospital infection.

[30]  C. Walsh,et al.  Characterization of Sfp, a Bacillus subtilis phosphopantetheinyl transferase for peptidyl carrier protein domains in peptide synthetases. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[31]  F. Tenover,et al.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strain with reduced vancomycin susceptibility. , 1997, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[32]  Antoni R. Slabas,et al.  A Mechanism of Drug Action Revealed by Structural Studies of Enoyl Reductase , 1996, Science.

[33]  R. Heath,et al.  Enoyl-Acyl Carrier Protein Reductase (fabI) Plays a Determinant Role in Completing Cycles of Fatty Acid Elongation in Escherichia coli(*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[34]  B. Leitinger,et al.  Protein EnvM is the NADH-dependent enoyl-ACP reductase (FabI) of Escherichia coli. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[35]  S. Bradley Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. , 1992, Clinics in geriatric medicine.

[36]  W J Martone,et al.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in U.S. hospitals, 1975-1991. , 1992, Infection control and hospital epidemiology.

[37]  J. Waitz Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically , 1990 .

[38]  G. Högenauer,et al.  envM genes of Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli , 1989, Journal of bacteriology.

[39]  W. Cleland,et al.  Statistical analysis of enzyme kinetic data. , 2006, Methods in enzymology.

[40]  E. Weirich,et al.  Antimicrobial spectrum of triclosan, a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent for topical application. II. Comparison with some other antimicrobial agents. , 1979, Dermatologica.

[41]  M. M. Bradford A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. , 1976, Analytical biochemistry.

[42]  R. Russell,et al.  Conditional mutations affecting the cell envelope of Escherichia coli K-12. , 1973, Genetical research.

[43]  D. Rubin,et al.  Methicillin resistant staphylococci. , 1971, JAMA.