Quantitative evaluation of flexibility in undergraduate engineering curricula in the United Arab Emirates

In academia, smooth progression of students significantly depends on the way curricula are developed and organized. Curricula or study plans with high degree of interconnectivity between courses, multiple prerequisites, and hierarchically structured courses tend to complicate the smooth progress of the enrolled students. In this work, a rigorous quantitative relaxation indicator, developed and published elsewhere by the first author, has been applied to quantify the degree of stiffness and rigidity in undergraduate engineering curricula at the American University of Sharjah (AUS), the University of Sharjah (UOS), United Arab Emirates University (UAEU), and the Petroleum Institute (PI), which are the leading universities in the United Arab Emirates. Results indicate high rigidity (low relaxation indices) due to high degree of interconnectivity between courses, specifically in the second year of the study plans. The chemical engineering curriculum at PI exhibited the least flexibility due to very strong pre-and-co-requisite ties while the civil & environmental curriculum at UAEU showed the highest flexibility. The curricula considered require immediate attention and reorganization in order to facilitate smooth sequential progress of the students from one semester to another. A list of courses that require relaxation of strong pre-and corequisites ties has been presented for each curriculum.

[1]  N. Milgram,et al.  Situational and Personal Determinants of Academic Procrastination , 1992 .

[2]  Ellen Jansen,et al.  Effects of curriculum organisation on study progress in engineering studies , 2002 .

[3]  Laurence J. Jacobs,et al.  A Civil Engineering Curriculum for the Future: The Georgia Tech Case , 2000 .

[4]  Christopher D. Carlson,et al.  Teaching and learning One-Course-At-A-Time , 1992 .

[5]  Judith L. Johnson,et al.  An analysis of the contribution of the five factors of personality to variance in academic procrastination , 1995 .

[6]  Valery Vodovozov,et al.  FLEXIBLE CURRICULA BASED ON EDUCATIONAL THESAURUS , 2012 .

[7]  Ilene J. Busch‐Vishniac,et al.  Deconstructing Engineering Education Programs , 2003 .

[8]  S. Nonis,et al.  INFLUENCE OF PERCEIVED CONTROL OVER TIME ON COLLEGE STUDENTS' STRESS AND STRESS-RELATED OUTCOMES , 1998 .

[9]  Robert J. Vallerand,et al.  Self-Regulation and Academic Procrastination , 1995 .

[10]  Esat Alpay Student attraction to engineering through flexibility and breadth in the curriculum , 2013 .

[11]  Henri C. Schouwenburg,et al.  Procrastinators and fear of failure: an exploration of reasons for procrastination , 1992 .

[12]  N. Milgram,et al.  Correlates of academic procrastination: discomfort, task aversiveness, and task capability. , 1995, The Journal of psychology.

[13]  T. Macan Time management: Test of a process model. , 1994 .

[14]  W. E. Eder,et al.  Curriculum, pedagogics and didactics for design education , 2005 .