Transition to Science 2.0: “Remoralizing” the Economy of Science

The present is a moment of crisis and transition, both generally and specifically in “knowledge” and its institutions. Acknowledging this elicits the key questions: where are we? Where are we headed? What, if anything, can be done about this? And what can the “economics of science” contribute to this? This paper assumes a “cultural political economy of research & innovation” (CPERI) perspective to explore the current upheaval and transition in the system of academic knowledge production, at the confluence of accelerating commercialisation and the seemingly opposing movement of “open science.” This perspective affords a characterisation of the core of the current crises as a crisis of moral economy; an issue to which a political economy of epistemic authority is in turn crucial. A “remoralizing” of knowledge production is thus a matter of key systemic importance, though it is important to understand such developments in power-strategic, and not explicitly moral, terms. Much of the current moves towards “open science” and “massively open online courses” (MOOCs) can also then be seen as self-defeating developments that simply exacerbate the crisis of a viable “economy of science” and in no sense its solution. Their lasting significance, however, is more likely to lie precisely in their effects on the construction of a new moral economy of knowledge production.

[1]  Tim Brooks Copy, Rip, Burn: The Politics of Copyleft and Open Source , 2013 .

[2]  Jaron Lanier,et al.  Who Owns the Future , 2013 .

[3]  Viktor Mayer-Schnberger,et al.  Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think , 2013 .

[4]  Stevan Harnad,et al.  Worldwide open access: UK leadership? , 2013 .

[5]  J. Daniel Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and Possibility , 2012 .

[6]  David Tyfield,et al.  A Cultural Political Economy of Research and Innovation in an Age of Crisis , 2012, Minerva.

[7]  F. Kern Ideas, Institutions, and Interests: Explaining Policy Divergence in Fostering ‘System Innovations’ towards Sustainability , 2011 .

[8]  D. Tyfield The Economics of Science: A Critical Realist Overview: Volume 1: Illustrations and Philosophical Preliminaries , 2011 .

[9]  David Tyfield,et al.  The Economics of Science: A Critical Realist Overview: Volume 2: Towards a Synthesis of Political Economy and Science and Technology Studies , 2011 .

[10]  Colin Crouch,et al.  The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism , 2011 .

[11]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  The Innovative University: Changing the DNA of Higher Education from the Inside Out , 2011 .

[12]  F. Geels The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms , 2011 .

[13]  Philip Mirowski Science-Mart: Privatizing American Science , 2011 .

[14]  David Wield,et al.  From maturity to value-added innovation: lessons from the pharmaceutical and agro-biotechnology industries. , 2011, Trends in biotechnology.

[15]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges , 2010 .

[16]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Moving Outside or Inside? Objectification and Reflexivity in the Governance of Socio-Technical Systems , 2007 .

[17]  Simon Springer,et al.  A Brief History of Neoliberalism , 2007 .

[18]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930) , 2005, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[19]  Esther-Mirjam Sent,et al.  Economics of science: survey and suggestions , 1999 .

[20]  M. Heller,et al.  Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research , 1998, Science.

[21]  G. Boulton What are universities for? , 1997, The Idea of the University.

[22]  J. Dupré The disorder of things : metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science , 1994 .

[23]  Wim van der Stelt,et al.  Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: how to expand access to research publications.: Executive summary , 2014 .

[24]  Hans Radder,et al.  Science Transformed?: Debating Claims of an Epochal Break , 2011 .

[25]  Philip Mirowski,et al.  The Commercialization of Science and the Response of STS , 2008 .

[26]  F. Geels,et al.  System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy , 2005 .

[27]  S. Clarke Marx, Marginalism and Modern Sociology , 1991 .