A comparison of the effects of broadband masking noise on the auditory brainstem response in young and older adults.

We examined the effects of ipsilateral-direct, continuous, broadband noise on auditory brainstem response (ABR) wave I and V latencies and amplitudes in young adult versus older adult humans. It was hypothesized that age might influence the effects of masking noise on ABR peak latencies and/or amplitudes, given the frequent complaint of older persons' ability to process speech in background noise. Young adults had hearing thresholds of 20 dB HL or better for the octave frequencies from 250 to 8,000 Hz. A subset of older study participants had thresholds of 20 dB HL or better across frequency, but others had thresholds up to 45 dB HL. All data were collected and analyzed with a Nicolet Bravo. An electrode was placed on the tympanic membrane (as well as on high forehead and contralateral mastoid), and a click level of 115 dB pSPL was used to maximize wave I amplitude. Masker conditions included a no-noise control and noise levels ranging from 20 to 70 dB effective masking, in 10 dB steps. With increasing noise level, both age groups showed minimal changes in wave I latency, but substantial increases in wave V latency and I-V interval. Peak amplitudes decreased with increasing noise level. Mean amplitudes were smaller for the older group, most notably for wave I. Mean peak latencies were greater in the older group, but the I-V interval was similar across age groups, as was the change in peak latencies and I-V interval across noise level. ABR parameters for the older adults with hearing meeting the 20-dB HL criterion at all frequencies (older-better) were compared to those who didn't meet this criterion (older-worse). Mean wave I latency was greater and wave V latency and I-V interval were smaller for the older-worse group at all noise levels. Mean wave I and V amplitudes were similar for the older-better and older-worse groups. In participants with normal or near-normal hearing, ABR changes with increasing age included small latency increases and a substantial reduction in wave I amplitude. The effects of ipsilateral-direct masking noise on the click-evoked ABR are similar for young and older adults.

[1]  Robert F Burkard,et al.  The Human Auditory Brain-stem Response to High Click Rates: Aging Effects. , 2001, American journal of audiology.

[2]  R. Burkard,et al.  The human auditory brainstem response to high click rates: aging effects. , 2001, American journal of audiology.

[3]  D. P. Phillips,et al.  Sensitivity of unanesthetized chinchilla auditory system to noise burst onset, and the effects of carboplatin , 2001, Hearing Research.

[4]  Robert Burkard,et al.  Inner hair cell loss leads to enhanced response amplitudes in auditory cortex of unanesthetized chinchillas: evidence for increased system gain , 2000, Hearing Research.

[5]  A. Palmer,et al.  Responses of chopper units in the ventral cochlear nucleus of the anaesthetised guinea pig to clicks-in-noise and click trains , 1997, Hearing Research.

[6]  J. McGee,et al.  Effects of stimulus rate on the feline brain-stem auditory evoked response during development. I. Peak latencies. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  R. Salvi,et al.  Selective inner hair cell loss does not alter distortion product otoacoustic emissions , 1996, Hearing Research.

[8]  D. Caspary,et al.  Age-related changes in auditory brainstem responses in fischer 344 rats: effects of rate and intensity , 1994, Hearing Research.

[9]  J. Mills,et al.  Age-related changes in auditory evoked potentials of gerbils. I. Response amplitudes , 1993, Hearing Research.

[10]  James W. Hall.  Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses , 1991 .

[11]  James F. Willott,et al.  Aging and the Auditory System: Anatomy, Physiology, and Psychophysics , 1991 .

[12]  R. Burkard,et al.  Ipsilateral, contralateral, and binaural masking effects on the human brain-stem auditory-evoked responses to click stimuli. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  B. Bergamasco,et al.  Aging effects on brainstem auditory evoked potentials. , 1990, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  R. A. Schmiedt,et al.  Compound action potential input/output functions in young and quiet-aged gerbils , 1990, Hearing Research.

[15]  R. Burkard,et al.  Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). III: Additivity of click level and rate with noise level. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  K E Hecox,et al.  Brain-stem auditory-evoked responses elicited by maximum length sequences: effect of simultaneous masking noise. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  K. Hecox,et al.  Effect of broadband noise on the human brain stem auditory evoked response. , 1989, Ear and hearing.

[18]  R. Burkard,et al.  Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). II: Effects of broadband noise level and high-pass masker cutoff frequency across click polarity. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  P. Gott,et al.  Effect of noise masking on the brain-stem and middle-latency auditory evoked potentials: central and peripheral components. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  J. Jerger,et al.  Interactions of age, gender, and sensorineural hearing loss on ABR latency. , 1988, Ear and hearing.

[21]  A R Palmer,et al.  Rate-intensity functions and their modification by broadband noise for neurons in the guinea pig inferior colliculus. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  J. Willott,et al.  Aging and the auditory brainstem response in mice with severe or minimal presbycusis , 1987, Hearing Research.

[23]  R. Burkard,et al.  The effect of broadband noise on the human brain-stem auditory evoked response. III. Anatomic locus. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  N. Chu,et al.  Age-related latency changes in the brain-stem auditory evoked potentials. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[25]  R. Burkard,et al.  The effect of broadband noise on the human brainstem auditory evoked response. I. Rate and intensity effects. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  C D Geisler,et al.  Auditory nerve fiber response to wide-band noise and tone combinations. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  M. Rowe.  Normal variability of the brain-stem auditory evoked response in young and old adult subjects. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[28]  A. Starr,et al.  Effect of Click Rate on the Latency of Auditory Brain Stem Responses in Humans , 1977, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[29]  D. D. Greenwood,et al.  Response of neurons in the cochlear nuclei to variations in noise bandwidth and to tone-noise combinations. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  R. Burkard,et al.  40 – Neurophysiological Manifestations of Aging in the Peripheral and Central Auditory Nervous System , 2001 .

[31]  N. Ingham,et al.  The auditory brainstem response of aged guinea pigs. , 1998, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[32]  D. Psatta,et al.  Age-dependent amplitude variation of brain-stem auditory evoked potentials. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[33]  C. Elberling,et al.  Reference data for ABRs in retrocochlear diagnosis. , 1987, Scandinavian audiology.

[34]  I. Thümmler,et al.  Brain-stem responses when masking with wide-band and high-pass filtered noise. , 1981, Scandinavian audiology.