CT volumetry performs better than nuclear renography in predicting estimated renal function one year after living donation

[1]  B. Chung,et al.  Comparison of CT volumetry versus nuclear renography for predicting remaining kidney function after uninephrectomy in living kidney donors , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[2]  N. Prasad,et al.  Determination of split renal function in voluntary renal donors by multidetector computed tomography and nuclear renography: How well do they correlate? , 2021, SA journal of radiology.

[3]  J. Tavares,et al.  Lower donated kidney volume is associated with increased risk of lower graft function and acute rejection at 1 year after living donor kidney—a retrospective study , 2020, Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation.

[4]  A. Garg,et al.  Changes in kidney function follow living donor nephrectomy. , 2020, Kidney international.

[5]  A. Fraga,et al.  Remaining kidney volume indexed to weight as a strong predictor of estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year and mid‐term renal function after living‐donor nephrectomy ‐ a retrospective observational study , 2020, Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation.

[6]  A. Garg,et al.  Association of Early Postdonation Renal Function With Subsequent Risk of End-Stage Renal Disease in Living Kidney Donors. , 2020, JAMA surgery.

[7]  A. Garg,et al.  Can Split Renal Volume Assessment by Computed Tomography Replace Nuclear Split Renal Function in Living Kidney Donor Evaluations? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2019, Canadian journal of kidney health and disease.

[8]  Eric McArthur,et al.  Duration of Living Kidney Transplant Donor Evaluations: Findings From 2 Multicenter Cohort Studies. , 2018, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[9]  M. Blaufox,et al.  The SNMMI and EANM practice guideline for renal scintigraphy in adults , 2018, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[10]  P. Andrews,et al.  British Transplantation Society / Renal Association UK Guidelines for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation 2018: Summary of Updated Guidance. , 2018, Transplantation.

[11]  A. Garg,et al.  Summary of Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors , 2017, Transplantation.

[12]  Masami Watanabe,et al.  The assessment of renal cortex and parenchymal volume using automated CT volumetry for predicting renal function after donor nephrectomy , 2017, Clinical and Experimental Nephrology.

[13]  S. Kim,et al.  CT volumetry is superior to nuclear renography for prediction of residual kidney function in living donors , 2016, Clinical transplantation.

[14]  M. Hellmich,et al.  Computed Tomography Volumetry in Preoperative Living Kidney Donor Assessment for Prediction of Split Renal Function , 2016, Transplantation.

[15]  I. Steffen,et al.  Optimizing scintigraphic evaluation of split renal function in living kidney donors using the geometric mean method: a preliminary retrospective study , 2016, Journal of Nephrology.

[16]  A. Israni,et al.  A prospective controlled study of living kidney donors: three-year follow-up. , 2015, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[17]  A. Garg,et al.  Worldwide access to treatment for end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review , 2015, The Lancet.

[18]  S. Busque,et al.  Longitudinal study of living kidney donor glomerular dynamics after nephrectomy. , 2015, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[19]  F. Dekker,et al.  Long-term risks for kidney donors. , 2014, Kidney international.

[20]  Mei-Cheng Wang,et al.  Risk of end-stage renal disease following live kidney donation. , 2014, JAMA.

[21]  T. Slowinski,et al.  Volume matters: CT‐based renal cortex volume measurement in the evaluation of living kidney donors , 2013, Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation.

[22]  Christopher H Schmid,et al.  Comparative performance of the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equations for estimating GFR levels above 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. , 2010, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[23]  B. Brenner,et al.  The clinical importance of nephron mass. , 2010, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[24]  B. Caffo,et al.  Perioperative mortality and long-term survival following live kidney donation. , 2010, JAMA.

[25]  W. Weimar,et al.  Long-term consequences of kidney donation. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  N. Fineberg,et al.  Determination of split renal function by 3D reconstruction of CT angiograms: a comparison with gamma camera renography. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  A. Kesselheim,et al.  Creating a medical, ethical, and legal framework for complex living kidney donors. , 2006, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[28]  J. Wadström,et al.  Measuring split renal function in renal donors: can computed tomography replace renography? , 2004, Acta radiologica.

[29]  T. Larson,et al.  Measured and estimated GFR in healthy potential kidney donors. , 2004, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[30]  A. Peters,et al.  Functional Imaging in Computed Tomography: The Use of Contrast‐Enhanced Computed Tomography for the Study of Renal Function and Physiology , 1993, Investigative radiology.