Comparison of projection- and image-based methods for proton stopping power estimation using dual energy CT

Abstract Background and Purpose Several strategies for estimating stopping power ratio (SPR) from dual-energy CT (DECT) have been proposed to improve accuracy of proton dose calculations. DECT methods can mainly be categorized into projection-based methods, where material decomposition is performed prior to image reconstruction, and image-based methods, where decomposition takes place after image reconstruction. With the advent of photon-counting and dual-layer technology, projection-based methods could be considered for SPR estimation. In this simulation-based study we compared the SPR accuracy of one projection- and three image-based DECT methods. Materials and Methods X-ray CT projections of the female ICRP phantom were simulated using two different X-ray spectra with a realistic detector response and noise levels. ICRP slices at four different locations were selected. Reference SPR-maps were computed at 200MeV. The SPR comparison was based on percentage deviation inside ROIs and relative range errors calculated with Radon transform of difference maps. Results SPR root-mean-square errors (RMSE) over the selected ROIs were 0.54% for the projection-based method and 0.68%, 0.61% and 0.70% for the three image-based methods. The RMSE for the relative range errors were slightly smaller for the projection-based approach, but close to zero for all decomposition domains as positive and negative errors averaged out over the slice. Conclusions SPR estimations with the projection-based method produced slightly better results (though not statistically significant) than the three image-based methods used in this simulation-based study, therefore, with the advent of technological developments, projection-based methods could be considered for SPR estimation if projection data is available.

[1]  R. A. Rutherford,et al.  Measurement of effective atomic number and electron density using an EMI scanner , 2004, Neuroradiology.

[2]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  X-ray attenuation coefficients of elements and mixtures , 1981 .

[3]  Stéphane Bedwani,et al.  A theoretical comparison of tissue parameter extraction methods for dual energy computed tomography. , 2014, Medical physics.

[4]  G. Hounsfield.  Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography): Part I. Description of system. 1973. , 1973, The British journal of radiology.

[5]  A. van der Schaaf,et al.  Relative electron density determination using a physics based parameterization of photon interactions in medical DECT , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  XCOM: Photon Cross Section Database (version 1.2) , 1999 .

[7]  Peter Sigmund,et al.  Errata and Addenda for ICRU Report 73, Stopping of ions heavier than helium , 2009 .

[8]  J. Seco,et al.  Deriving effective atomic numbers from DECT based on a parameterization of the ratio of high and low linear attenuation coefficients , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  T. Flohr,et al.  Spectral Computed Tomography , 2012 .

[10]  Steffen Greilich,et al.  Experimental verification of ion stopping power prediction from dual energy CT data in tissue surrogates , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Scott N Penfold,et al.  Dosimetric comparison of stopping power calibration with dual-energy CT and single-energy CT in proton therapy treatment planning. , 2016, Medical physics.

[12]  Relationship between electron density and effective densities of body tissues for stopping, scattering, and nuclear interactions of proton and ion beams. , 2012, Medical physics.

[13]  H. K. Huang,et al.  Comparison of four dual energy image decomposition methods , 1988 .

[14]  Frank Verhaegen,et al.  Dual energy CT in radiotherapy: Current applications and future outlook. , 2016, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  A. Macovski,et al.  Energy-selective reconstructions in X-ray computerised tomography , 1976, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Technical Note: Procedure for the calibration and validation of kilo-voltage cone-beam CT models. , 2016, Medical physics.

[17]  E. Pedroni,et al.  The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  Steffen Greilich,et al.  Ion range estimation by using dual energy computed tomography. , 2013, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[19]  Paolo Farace,et al.  Experimental verification of ion stopping power prediction from dual energy CT data in tissue surrogates , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  James A. Scott.  Photon, Electron, Proton and Neutron Interaction Data for Body Tissues ICRU Report 46. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda, 1992, $40.00 , 1993 .

[21]  F. Verhaegen,et al.  Dual-energy CT-based material extraction for tissue segmentation in Monte Carlo dose calculations , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  R. Mohan,et al.  Theoretical variance analysis of single- and dual-energy computed tomography methods for calculating proton stopping power ratios of biological tissues , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  K Parodi,et al.  Monte Carlo comparison of x-ray and proton CT for range calculations of proton therapy beams , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Joao Seco,et al.  Tissue decomposition from dual energy CT data for MC based dose calculation in particle therapy. , 2014, Medical physics.

[25]  M. Saito.  Potential of dual-energy subtraction for converting CT numbers to electron density based on a single linear relationship. , 2012, Medical physics.

[26]  Range prediction for tissue mixtures based on dual-energy CT. , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  Ming Yang.  DUAL ENERGY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY FOR PROTON THERAPY TREATMENT PLANNING , 2011 .

[28]  R. Brooks,et al.  Beam hardening in X-ray reconstructive tomography , 1976 .

[29]  Simon Rit,et al.  The Reconstruction Toolkit (RTK), an open-source cone-beam CT reconstruction toolkit based on the Insight Toolkit (ITK) , 2014 .

[30]  Vicki T Taasti,et al.  A robust empirical parametrization of proton stopping power using dual energy CT. , 2016, Medical physics.

[31]  Alexandra E Bourque,et al.  A stoichiometric calibration method for dual energy computed tomography , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[32]  Jeffrey V Siebers,et al.  A linear, separable two-parameter model for dual energy CT imaging of proton stopping power computation. , 2016, Medical physics.

[33]  Julio F Almansa,et al.  A new method to measure electron density and effective atomic number using dual-energy CT images , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  Frank Verhaegen,et al.  A simulation study on proton computed tomography (CT) stopping power accuracy using dual energy CT scans as benchmark , 2015, Acta oncologica.

[35]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[36]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of proton range uncertainties related to patient stopping-power-ratio estimation using the stoichiometric calibration , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[37]  C Lartizien,et al.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.