Thoratec Ventricular Assist Devices in Children With Less Than 1.3 m2 of Body Surface Area

This report summarizes the multicenter experience with the Thoratec paracorporeal pneumatic ventricular assist device (VAD) (Thoratec Corp., Pleasanton, CA) in small children. Between October 1988 and August 2001, 19 children (11 male, 8 female) with less than 1.3 (mean 1.09, range 0.73–1.29) m2 body surface area (BSA) have been supported with univentricular (9) or biventricular (10) Thoratec VADs in 12 centers in the United States and Germany. Mean patient age was 10 (range 7–14) years, mean weight 31 (range 17–41) kg. Indications for support were end-stage cardiomyopathy in eight patients, myocarditis in three, end-stage congenital heart disease in seven, and transplant graft failure in one patient. Mean duration of support was 43 (range 0–120) days. In patients with cardiomyopathies and myocarditis, survival through discharge occurred in 8 of 11 (72%) patients; however, only 1 of 7 patients with congenital disease survived. Outcome appeared independent of patient size. Neurologic complications were significant and predominant in the congenital disease group. Our experience suggests that the Thoratec VAD can be successfully used in these difficult patients, particularly in children with cardiomyopathies and myocarditis. Congenital disease is associated with increased risk. To reduce thromboembolic risk, we recommend left ventricular as opposed to left atrial inflow cannulation and higher device rates with partial stroke volumes.

[1]  J. Copeland,et al.  Multicenter experience with the thoratec ventricular assist device in children and adolescents. , 2001, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[2]  J. Copeland,et al.  Bridge to transplantation with a Thoratec left ventricular assist device in a 17-kg child. , 2001, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[3]  H. Laks,et al.  Short-term bridge to transplant using the BVS 5000 in a 22-kg child. , 2000, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[4]  D. N. Helman,et al.  Implantable left ventricular assist devices can successfully bridge adolescent patients to transplant. , 2000, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[5]  D. Deming,et al.  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for perioperative support in neonatal and pediatric cardiac transplantation. , 1999, Artificial organs.

[6]  U Schütt,et al.  Bridging to Cardiac Transplantation With the Thoratec Ventricular Assist Device , 1999, The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon.

[7]  R. Hetzer,et al.  Circulatory support with pneumatic paracorporeal ventricular assist device in infants and children. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[8]  H. Reul,et al.  Clinical experience with the MEDOS HIA-VAD system in infants and children: a preliminary report. , 1997, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[9]  M C Oz,et al.  Left ventricular assist device options in pediatric patients. , 1995, ASAIO journal.

[10]  J. Meliones,et al.  Extracorporeal life support for cardiac assist in pediatric patients. Review of ELSO Registry data. , 1991, Circulation.

[11]  L. Gray,et al.  Preoperative and postoperative comparison of patients with univentricular and biventricular support with the thoratec ventricular assist device as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. , 1997, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.