The VRehab System: A Low-Cost Mobile Virtual Reality System for Post-Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation for Medically Underserved Populations

Stroke disparities are widespread in both developed and underdeveloped countries, with a disproportionate burden placed on individuals who live in rural areas, those of lower socioeconomic status, and those with inadequate or absent medical insurance. Underserved individuals are often unable to access post-stroke rehabilitation services due to their high out-of-pocket costs, difficulty with transportation, and/or the lack of stroke rehabilitation providers in their geographical area. After a stroke, patients exhibit upper limb problems, such as hemiparesis, hemiplegia, loss of sensation, pain and spasticity, and ataxia. Although it is recommended that patients undergo physical rehabilitation for limb impairments, patients with moderate to severe impairments do respond well to conventional physical therapy programs, are less likely to regain upper limb function, and consume substantial hospital and clinic resources, compared to stroke patients with mild to moderate upper limb impairments. These issues have motivated researchers to develop Virtual Reality (VR) applications that have the potential to combat the distinctive challenges that medically underserved stroke patients' face. In this project, we introduce the VRehab system: a low-cost, portable, flexible, and interactive VR system for stroke rehabilitation. VR system user expectations were examined via online survey, while walkthrough and semi-structured interviews were conducted to evaluate the usability of the VRehab system. Overall, the results of the online survey (n = 73) indicated that individuals thought that a VR system should be priced between $100-300, take no more than 10 minutes to set up, and contain sports content. Usability testing revealed that while the system was quick and easy to setup, and featured engaging game content, further refinement was required in order to enhance the usability and acceptability of the platform for users. Future directions for research are discussed including clinical trials in which the effectiveness of the VRehab system to improve upper limb motor function in medically underserved stroke patients is examined.

[1]  K. Sunnerhagen,et al.  Virtual reality and haptics as a training device for movement rehabilitation after stroke: a single-case study. , 2004, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

[2]  Karien Stronks,et al.  Socioeconomic Inequalities in Stroke Incidence Among Migrant Groups: Analysis of Nationwide Data , 2014, Stroke.

[3]  M Massucci,et al.  Is health-related-quality of life of stroke patients influenced by neurological impairments at one year after stroke? , 2010, European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[4]  Jiming Fang,et al.  Socioeconomic Status and Care After Stroke: Results From the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network , 2013, Stroke.

[5]  J F Burke,et al.  Effect of insurance status on postacute care among working age stroke survivors , 2012, Neurology.

[6]  Koen Putman,et al.  Effect of socioeconomic status on functional and motor recovery after stroke: a European multicentre study , 2006, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[7]  Michelle N McDonnell,et al.  Rehabilitation Interventions for Upper Limb Function in the First Four Weeks Following Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Evidence. , 2017, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  M. Fornage,et al.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association , 2017, Circulation.

[9]  Kelly Anderson,et al.  Virtual reality video games to promote movement recovery in stroke rehabilitation: a guide for clinicians. , 2015, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  Marie Donaghy,et al.  Predicting health related quality of life 6 months after stroke: the role of anxiety and upper limb dysfunction , 2013, Disability and rehabilitation.

[11]  D. Wade,et al.  Loss of arm function after stroke: measurement, frequency, and recovery. , 1986, International rehabilitation medicine.

[12]  S. Kranz Upper Extremity Function in Stroke Subjects: Relationships between the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Domains , 2012 .

[13]  Hao Jiang,et al.  MyoHMI: A low-cost and flexible platform for developing real-time human machine interface for myoelectric controlled applications , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[14]  Kyler M. Godwin,et al.  Cost Associated with Stroke: Outpatient Rehabilitative Services and Medication , 2011, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[15]  Ya-Chen Lee,et al.  The impact of stroke: insights from patients in Taiwan. , 2010, Occupational therapy international.

[16]  Lee Schwamm,et al.  Interactions within stroke systems of care: a policy statement from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. , 2013, Stroke.

[17]  J. Deutsch,et al.  Virtual Reality for Stroke Rehabilitation , 2012 .

[18]  David Swapp,et al.  Interaction with haptic feedback and co-location in virtual reality , 2005 .

[19]  A. M. Pettersen,et al.  Subjective well-being one year after stroke , 1997, Clinical rehabilitation.

[20]  N K Aaronson,et al.  Quality of Life After Stroke: Impact of Stroke Type and Lesion Location , 1995 .

[21]  Lesley Maisch,et al.  Certain uncertainty: life after stroke from the patient's perspective. , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[22]  Mel Slater,et al.  A Framework for Immersive Virtual Environments (FIVE): Speculations on the Role of Presence in Virtual Environments , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[23]  P. Weiss,et al.  The potential of virtual reality for rehabilitation. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.