Errors in emergency physician interpretation of ST-segment elevation in emergency department chest pain patients.

OBJECTIVE To determine the rate of error in emergency physician (EP) interpretation of the cause of electrocardiographic (ECG) ST-segment elevation (STE) in adult chest pain patients. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective ECG review of adult chest pain patients in a university hospital emergency department (ED) over a three-month period (January 1 to March 31, 1996). ST-segment elevation was determined to be present if the ST segment was elevated >/=1 mm in the limb leads and >/=2 mm in the precordial leads in at least two anatomically contiguous leads. Initial EP ECG interpretation was compared with the final interpretation by a cardiologist supported by the results of various clinical investigations. The rate of incorrect ECG diagnosis was calculated. RESULTS Two hundred two patients had STEs. The rate of ECG STE misinterpretation was 12 of 202 (5.9%). The most frequently misdiagnosed form of STE was left ventricular aneurysm, for which two of five cases were believed to represent acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The benign early repolarization (BER) pattern was the second most frequently misinterpreted STE entity-in a total of three cases, two were initially noted to represent pericarditis and one AMI. ST-segment elevation resulting from actual AMI was initially incorrectly noted to be noninfarction in etiology in two cases, one patient with BER and the other with left ventricular hypertrophy. CONCLUSIONS Emergency physicians show a low rate of ECG misinterpretation in the patient with chest pain and STE. The clinical consequences of this misinterpretation are minimal.

[1]  S. Silvers,et al.  Clinical Policy: Critical Issues in the Evaluation and Management of Adult Patients Presenting With Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction or Unstable Angina. , 2000, Annals of emergency medicine.

[2]  Richard P. Lewis,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  J. Blankenship,et al.  Cardiovascular complications of thrombolytic therapy in patients with a mistaken diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  R. Califf,et al.  Minimizing the risk of inappropriately administering thrombolytic therapy (Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction [TAMI] study group). , 1993, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  P. Kligfield,et al.  Relationship of prior myocardial infarction to false-positive electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute injury in patients with chest pain. , 1987, Archives of internal medicine.

[6]  R Roberts,et al.  Electrocardiographic and clinical criteria for recognition of acute myocardial infarction based on analysis of 3,697 patients. , 1983, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  T. Henry,et al.  Impact of the electrocardiogram on the delivery of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. , 1994, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  R. Califf,et al.  1999 update: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  T. Aufderheide,et al.  Evaluation of ST segment elevation criteria for the prehospital electrocardiographic diagnosis fo acute myocardial infarction. , 1994, Annals of emergency medicine.

[10]  W. Brady,et al.  Electrocardiographic ST-segment elevation: correct identification of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and non-AMI syndromes by emergency physicians. , 2001, Academic Emergency Medicine.