Statistical and diagnostic evaluation of the ADMS-Urban model compared with an urban air quality monitoring network

The present study examines the behaviour of the ADMS-Urban air quality forecasting model in predicting dispersion of traffic-related pollutants in urban areas. The study has been carried out in Ravenna (NE Italy), a medium-sized town where pollution produced by vehicle traffic accounts for most of the emissions. ADMS-Urban performances have been assessed through statistical analysis, by comparing carbon monoxide concentrations (vehicle traffic tracing pollutant) estimated by the model with concentrations measured by stations of the air quality monitoring network. Although the correspondence of values estimated by ADMS-Urban with measured values turns out to be satisfactory, the study shows that the model tends to produce an underestimated value compared with the actual situation, and identifies a corrective method that makes it possible to improve the relevant performances. Furthermore, the diagnostic analysis highlights that the model performances depend upon some meteorological parameters.

[1]  Markus Friedrich A MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORT MODEL FOR INTEGRATED PLANNING , 1999 .

[2]  Ian Mudway,et al.  Investigation into the use of the CUSUM technique in identifying changes in mean air pollution levels following introduction of a traffic management scheme , 2007 .

[3]  H S Eggleston,et al.  CORINAIR WORKING GROUP ON EMISSION FACTORS FOR CALCULATING 1990 EMISSION FROM ROAD TRAFFIC. , 1992 .

[4]  Albert A. M. Holtslag,et al.  A Simple Scheme for Daytime Estimates of the Surface Fluxes from Routine Weather Data , 1983 .

[5]  Jaakko Kukkonen,et al.  Evaluation of a Gaussian and a Lagrangian model against a roadside data set, with emphasis on low wind speed conditions , 2001 .

[6]  R. Sivacoumar,et al.  LINE SOURCE MODEL FOR VEHICULAR POLLUTION PREDICTION NEAR ROADWAYS AND MODEL EVALUATION THROUGH STATISTICAL ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[7]  Ari Karppinen,et al.  A semi-empirical model for urban PM10 concentrations, and its evaluation against data from an urban measurement network , 2001 .

[8]  Rex Britter,et al.  Flow and pollutant dispersion modelling in a street canyon using FLUENT and ADMS-Urban , 2005 .

[9]  C. Willmott Some Comments on the Evaluation of Model Performance , 1982 .

[10]  Ole Hertel,et al.  The Operational Street Pollution Model (OSPM) , 1991 .

[11]  C. Cacciamani,et al.  Operational meteorological pre-processing at Emilia- Romagna ARPA Meteorological Service as a part of a decision support system for air quality management. , 2001 .

[12]  David Carruthers,et al.  Recent studies to validate and compare atmospheric dispersion models for regulatory purposes in the UK , 2000 .

[13]  C. A. McHugh,et al.  Use and validation of ADMS-Urban in contrasting urban and industrial locations , 2000 .

[14]  Ari Karppinen,et al.  Statistical and diagnostic evaluation of a new-generation urban dispersion modelling system against an extensive dataset in the Helsinki area , 2001 .

[15]  Ari Karppinen,et al.  Evaluation of the CAR-FMI model against measurements near a major road , 2001 .

[16]  M. P. Singh,et al.  Comparative study of line source models for estimating lead levels due to vehicular traffic in Delhi , 1995 .

[17]  J. Fenger,et al.  Urban air quality , 1999 .

[18]  Roberto San José García,et al.  Prediction of ozone levels in London using the MM5-CMAQ modelling system , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[19]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change , 1997 .