Flawed Processing of Airborne EM Data Affecting Hydrogeological Interpretation

Airborne electromagnetics (AEMs) is increasingly being used across the globe as a tool for groundwater and environmental management. Focus is on ensuring the quality of the source data, their processing and modeling, and the integration of results with ancillary information to generate accurate and relevant products. Accurate processing and editing of raw AEM data, the topic of this article, is one of the crucial steps in obtaining quantitative information for groundwater modeling and management. In this article, we examine the consequences that different levels of processing of helicopter transient electromagnetic method data have on the resulting electrical models and subsequently on hydrogeological models. We focus on different approaches used in the industry for processing of the raw data and show how the electrical resistivity–depth models, which is the end “geophysical” product (after data inversion) of an AEM survey, change with different levels of processing of the raw data. We then extend the study to show the impact on some of the hydrogeological parameters or models, which can be derived from the geophysical results. The consequences of improper handling of raw data to groundwater and environmental management can be significant and expensive.

[1]  Esben Auken,et al.  Salinity Distribution in Heterogeneous Coastal Aquifers Mapped by Airborne Electromagnetics , 2011 .

[2]  Andrea Viezzoli,et al.  Quantification of modeling errors in airborne TEM caused by inaccurate system description , 2011 .

[3]  Stefan Piasecki,et al.  Lithostratigraphy of the Upper Oligocene - Miocene succession of Denmark , 2010 .

[4]  Bruce D. Smith,et al.  Quantitative Hydrogeological Framework Interpretations Using Heliborne Electromagnetic Surveys for the North Platte Valley, Western Nebraska Groundwater Model , 2010 .

[5]  Glenn A. Wilson,et al.  Accurate quasi 3D versus practical full 3D inversion of AEM data – the Bookpurnong case study , 2010 .

[6]  E. Auken,et al.  A global measure for Depth of Investigation in EM and DC Modeling , 2010 .

[7]  Esben Auken,et al.  A Global Measure for Depth of Investigation , 2010 .

[8]  D. Sattel,et al.  An Overview of Helicopter Time-Domain EM Systems , 2009 .

[9]  Esben Auken,et al.  Integrated management and utilization of hydrogeophysical data on a national scale , 2009 .

[10]  A. Christiansen,et al.  An integrated processing scheme for high-resolution airborne electromagnetic surveys, the SkyTEM system , 2009 .

[11]  T. Sonnenborg,et al.  Use of alternative conceptual models to assess the impact of a buried valley on groundwater vulnerability , 2008 .

[12]  A. Christiansen,et al.  Quasi-3D modeling of airborne TEM data by spatially constrained inversion , 2008 .

[13]  T. Munday,et al.  The application of airborne geophysical data as a means of better understanding the efficacy of disposal basins along the Murray River: An example from Stockyard Plains, South Australia , 2007 .

[14]  Flemming Jørgensen,et al.  Buried and open tunnel valleys in Denmark—erosion beneath multiple ice sheets , 2006 .

[15]  Esben Auken,et al.  SkyTEM–a New High-resolution Helicopter Transient Electromagnetic System , 2004 .

[16]  R. Thomsen,et al.  Hydrogeological mapping as a basis for establishing site-specific groundwater protection zones in Denmark , 2004 .

[17]  J. Pemberton,et al.  Integrated Processing , 2003 .

[18]  J. Wynn Mapping Ground Water in Three Dimensions - An Analysis of Airborne Geophysical Surveys of the Upper San Pedro River Basin, Cochise County, Southeastern Arizona , 2006 .

[19]  P. English,et al.  INTERPRETING AIRBORNE ELECTROMAGNETIC DATA AS AN ADJUNCT TO HYDROGEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS: HONEYSUCKLE CREEK CATCHMENT, VICTORIA , 2004 .

[20]  Andrew Fitzpatrick,et al.  THE POTENTIAL OF GEOPHYSICS TO MAP SALT WATER INTRUSION IN THE BURDEKIN DELTA , 2004 .

[21]  J. Wynn Evaluating groundwater in arid lands using airborne magnetic/EM methods: An example in the southwestern U.S. and northern Mexico , 2002 .

[22]  R. Shaver,et al.  Hydraulic Barriers in Pleistocene Buried‐Valley Aquifers , 1992 .