Climate change vulnerability of forest biodiversity: climate and competition tracking of demographic rates

Forest responses to climate change will depend on demographic impacts in the context of competition. Current models used to predict species responses, termed climate envelope models (CEMs), are controversial, because (i) calibration and prediction are based on correlations in space (CIS) between species abundance and climate, rather than responses to climate change over time (COT), and (ii) they omit competition. To determine the relative importance of COT, CIS, and competition for light, we applied a longitudinal analysis of 27 000 individual trees over 6–18 years subjected to experimental and natural variation in risk factors. Sensitivities and climate and resource tracking identify which species are vulnerable to these risk factors and in what ways. Results show that responses to COT differ from those predicted based on CIS. The most important impact is the effect of spring temperature on fecundity, rather than any input variable on growth or survival. Of secondary importance is growing season moisture. Species in the genera Pinus, Ulmus, Magnolia, and Fagus are particularly vulnerable to climate variation. However, the effect of competition on growth and mortality risk exceeds the effects of climate variation in space or time for most species. Because sensitivities to COT and competition are larger than CIS, current models miss the most important effects. By directly comparing sensitivity to climate in time and space, together with competition, the approach identifies which species are sensitive to climate change and why, including the heretofore overlooked impact on fecundity.

[1]  Pankaj Agarwal,et al.  Inferential ecosystem models, from network data to prediction. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[2]  R. Q. Thomas,et al.  Frequency, not relative abundance, of temperate tree species varies along climate gradients in eastern North America. , 2010, Ecology.

[3]  Janneke HilleRisLambers,et al.  High‐dimensional coexistence based on individual variation: a synthesis of evidence , 2010 .

[4]  Ram Oren,et al.  Differential responses to changes in growth temperature between trees from different functional groups and biomes: a review and synthesis of data. , 2010, Tree physiology.

[5]  Anping Chen,et al.  Unlocking the forest inventory data: relating individual tree performance to unmeasured environmental factors. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[6]  James S. Clark,et al.  References and Notes Supporting Online Material Individuals and the Variation Needed for High Species Diversity in Forest Trees , 2022 .

[7]  G. Parker,et al.  Evidence for a recent increase in forest growth , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  M. D. Nelson,et al.  Selecting tree species for testing climate change migration hypotheses using forest inventory data , 2010 .

[9]  M. Hughes,et al.  Recent unprecedented tree-ring growth in bristlecone pine at the highest elevations and possible causes , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Functional tradeoffs determine species coexistence via the storage effect , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  M. Zappa,et al.  Climate change and plant distribution: local models predict high‐elevation persistence , 2009 .

[12]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Drought Sensitivity of the Amazon Rainforest , 2009, Science.

[13]  Daniel M. Griffith,et al.  Beyond Reserves: A Research Agenda for Conserving Biodiversity in Human‐modified Tropical Landscapes , 2009 .

[14]  Tim M. Blackburn,et al.  Do climate envelope models transfer? A manipulative test using dung beetle introductions , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  D. Purves.  The demography of range boundaries versus range cores in eastern US tree species , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  Louis R. Iverson,et al.  Composition and carbon dynamics of forests in northeastern North America in a future, warmer world , 2009 .

[17]  James S. Clark,et al.  Evaluating the sources of potential migrant species: implications under climate change. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[18]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  Putting people in the map: anthropogenic biomes of the world , 2008 .

[19]  A. Gimona,et al.  Opening the climate envelope reveals no macroscale associations with climate in European birds , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  T. Masaki,et al.  Geographical variation in climatic cues for mast seeding of Fagus crenata , 2008, Population Ecology.

[21]  Michael C. Dietze,et al.  CHANGING THE GAP DYNAMICS PARADIGM: VEGETATIVE REGENERATION CONTROL ON FOREST RESPONSE TO DISTURBANCE , 2008 .

[22]  N. McDowell,et al.  Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? , 2008, The New phytologist.

[23]  B. Beckage,et al.  A rapid upward shift of a forest ecotone during 40 years of warming in the Green Mountains of Vermont , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  M. Luoto,et al.  Disregarding topographical heterogeneity biases species turnover assessments based on bioclimatic models , 2008 .

[25]  S. Saatchi,et al.  Fire, climate change and biodiversity in Amazonia: a Late-Holocene perspective , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  A. Prasad,et al.  Estimating potential habitat for 134 eastern US tree species under six climate scenarios , 2008 .

[27]  M. Araújo,et al.  The importance of biotic interactions for modelling species distributions under climate change , 2007 .

[28]  N. Stephenson,et al.  Apparent climatically induced increase of tree mortality rates in a temperate forest. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[29]  D. Nepstad,et al.  Mortality of large trees and lianas following experimental drought in an Amazon forest. , 2007, Ecology.

[30]  James S. Clark,et al.  Resolving the biodiversity paradox. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[31]  A. Dobson,et al.  Projected Impacts of Climate and Land-Use Change on the Global Diversity of Birds , 2007, PLoS biology.

[32]  M. Power,et al.  Species Interactions Reverse Grassland Responses to Changing Climate , 2007, Science.

[33]  T. Noda,et al.  Experimental investigation on weather cues for mast seeding of Fagus crenata , 2007, Ecological Research.

[34]  N. Breda,et al.  Temperate forest trees and stands under severe drought: a review of ecophysiological responses, adaptation processes and long-term consequences , 2006 .

[35]  V. Wolters,et al.  Impact of summer drought on forest biodiversity: what do we know? , 2006 .

[36]  James S. Clark,et al.  Predicting biodiversity change: outside the climate envelope, beyond the species-area curve. , 2006, Ecology.

[37]  Richard Condit,et al.  The Importance of Demographic Niches to Tree Diversity , 2006, Science.

[38]  Michael J. Papaik,et al.  Neighborhood analyses of canopy tree competition along environmental gradients in New England forests. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[39]  I. Hodkinson,et al.  Terrestrial insects along elevation gradients: species and community responses to altitude , 2005, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[40]  D. Urban,et al.  Trends in twentieth-century tree growth at high elevations in the Sierra Nevada and White Mountains, USA , 2005 .

[41]  J. Zimmerman,et al.  Seedling recruitment in a hurricane‐driven tropical forest: light limitation, density‐dependence and the spatial distribution of parent trees , 2005 .

[42]  Bettina M. J. Engelbrecht,et al.  Drought effects on seedling survival in a tropical moist forest , 2005, Trees.

[43]  Jonathan Silvertown,et al.  Plant coexistence and the niche , 2004 .

[44]  William L. Baker,et al.  Quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) at treeline: a century of change in the San Juan Mountains, Colorado, USA , 2004 .

[45]  O. Phillips,et al.  Extinction risk from climate change , 2004, Nature.

[46]  T. Dawson,et al.  Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? , 2003 .

[47]  D. Parsons,et al.  Growth rate predicts mortality of Abies concolor in both burned and unburned stands , 2003 .

[48]  D. Foster,et al.  Legacies of the agricultural past in the forested present: an assessment of historical land‐use effects on rich mesic forests , 2002 .

[49]  K. Wessels,et al.  Vulnerability of South African animal taxa to climate change , 2002 .

[50]  A. Lloyd,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Variability in the Growth and Climate Response of Treeline Trees in Alaska , 2002 .

[51]  J. Palutikof,et al.  Climate change 2007 : impacts, adaptation and vulnerability , 2001 .

[52]  James S. Clark,et al.  Invasion by Extremes: Population Spread with Variation in Dispersal and Reproduction , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[53]  D. Peterson,et al.  Recent growth of conifer species of western North America: assessing spatial patterns of radial growth trends , 2001 .

[54]  Bruce P. Finney,et al.  Reduced growth of Alaskan white spruce in the twentieth century from temperature-induced drought stress , 2000, Nature.

[55]  G. Houle.  Mast seeding in Abies balsamea, Acer saccharum and Betula alleghaniensis in an old growth, cold temperate forest of north‐eastern North America , 1999 .

[56]  Werner Kofler,et al.  Climate-tree-growth relationships of Scots pine stands (Pinus sylvestris L.) exposed to soil dryness , 1998, Trees.

[57]  Alan E. Gelfand,et al.  Model choice: A minimum posterior predictive loss approach , 1998, AISTATS.

[58]  J. Clark.  Testing Disturbance Theory with Long-Term Data: Alternative Life-History Solutions to the Distribution of Events , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[59]  Craig Loehle,et al.  Model-based assessments of climate change effects on forests , 1995 .

[60]  John A. Silander,et al.  Juvenile Tree Survivorship as a Component of Shade Tolerance , 1995 .

[61]  Emery R. Boose,et al.  Patterns of forest damage resulting from catastrophic wind in central New England, USA , 1992 .

[62]  Michael Lavine,et al.  Problems in Extrapolation Illustrated with Space Shuttle O-Ring Data , 1991 .

[63]  P. Harcombe,et al.  Woody seedling dynamics in an east Texas floodplain forest. , 1989 .

[64]  T. J. Blasing,et al.  An analysis of climate and competition as contributors to decline of red spruce in high elevation Appalachian forests of the Eastern United states , 1987, Oecologia.

[65]  D. Goldberg,et al.  Vegetation Change and Plant Demography in Permanent Plots in the Sonoran Desert , 1986 .

[66]  R. Merrill,et al.  Combined effects of climate and biotic interactions on the elevational range of a phytophagous insect. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[67]  Masataka Watanabe,et al.  Factors affecting forest growth and possible effects of climate change in the Taihang Mountains, northern China , 2006 .

[68]  E. Bermingham,et al.  The El Niño Southern Oscillation influences tree performance in tropical rainforests. , 2005 .

[69]  James S. Clark,et al.  Tree growth prediction using size and exposed crown area , 2005 .

[70]  Wolfgang Cramer,et al.  A simulation model for the transient effects of climate change on forest landscapes , 1993 .