Application of automated NOE assignment to three-dimensional structure refinement of a 28 kDa single-chain T cell receptor

An automated procedure for NOE assignment and three-dimensional structure refinement is presented. The input to the procedure consists of (1) an ensemble of preliminary protein NMR structures, (2) partial sequence-specific assignments for the protein and (3) the positions and volumes of unassigned NOESY cross peaks. Chemical shifts for unassigned side chain protons are predicted from the preliminary structures. The chemical shifts and unassigned NOESY cross peaks are input to an automated procedure for NOE assignment and structure calculation (ARIA) [Nilges et al. (1997) J. Mol. Biol., 269, 408–422]. ARIA is optimized for the task of structure refinement of larger proteins. Errors are filtered to ensure that sequence-specific assignments are reliable. The procedure is applied to the 27.8 kDa single-chain T cell receptor (scTCR). Preliminary NMR structures, nearly complete backbone assignments, partial assignments of side chain protons and more than 1300 unassigned NOESY cross peaks are input. Using the procedure, the resonant frequencies of more than 40 additional side chain protons are assigned. Over 400 new NOE cross peaks are assigned unambiguously. Distances derived from the automatically assigned NOEs improve the precision and quality of calculated scTCR structures. In the refined structures, a hydrophobic cluster of side chains on the scTCR surface that binds major histocompatibility complex (MHC)/antigen is revealed. It is composed of the side chains of residues from three loops and stabilizes the conformation of residues that interact with MHC.

[1]  W. Braun,et al.  Automated assignment of simulated and experimental NOESY spectra of proteins by feedback filtering and self-correcting distance geometry. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  J. Thornton,et al.  PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures , 1993 .

[3]  Robert F. Boyko,et al.  Automated 1H and 13C chemical shift prediction using the BioMagResBank , 1997, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[4]  I D Kuntz,et al.  Application of distance geometry to the proton assignment problem , 1993, Biopolymers.

[5]  David A. Case,et al.  Density Functional Calculations of Proton Chemical Shifts in Model Peptides , 1997 .

[6]  Axel T. Brunger,et al.  X-PLOR Version 3.1: A System for X-ray Crystallography and NMR , 1992 .

[7]  A. Gronenborn,et al.  Determination of three‐dimensional structures of proteins from interproton distance data by dynamical simulated annealing from a random array of atoms Circumventing problems associated with folding , 1988, FEBS letters.

[8]  L R Pease,et al.  Structural basis of plasticity in T cell receptor recognition of a self peptide-MHC antigen. , 1998, Science.

[9]  P. Kraulis,et al.  Protein three-dimensional structure determination and sequence-specific assignment of 13C and 15N-separated NOE data. A novel real-space ab initio approach. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  Partho Ghosh,et al.  Structure of the complex between human T-cell receptor, viral peptide and HLA-A2 , 1996, Nature.

[11]  H Oschkinat,et al.  Automated NOESY interpretation with ambiguous distance restraints: the refined NMR solution structure of the pleckstrin homology domain from beta-spectrin. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  Werner Braun,et al.  Automated combined assignment of NOESY spectra and three-dimensional protein structure determination , 1997, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[13]  D. Case,et al.  A new analysis of proton chemical shifts in proteins , 1991 .

[14]  M. Saraste,et al.  FEBS Lett , 2000 .