All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects.

Accentuate the positive or accentuate the negative? The literature has been mixed as to how the alternative framing of information in positive or negative terms affects judgments and decisions. We argue that this is because different studies have employed different operational definitions of framing and thus have tapped different underlying processes. We develop a typology to distinguish between three different kinds of valence framing effects. First we discuss the standard risky choice framing effect introduced by Tversky and Kahneman (1981) to illustrate how valence affects willingness to take a risk. Then we discuss attribute framing, which affects the evaluation of object or event characteristics, and goal framing, which affects the persuasiveness of a communication. We describe the distinctions, provide a number of examples of each type, and discuss likely theoretical mechanisms underlying each type of framing effect. Our typology helps explain and resolve apparent confusions in the literature, ties together studies with common underlying mechanisms, and serves as a guide to future research and theory development. We conclude that a broader perspective, focused on the cognitive and motivational consequences of valence-based encoding, opens the door to a deeper understanding of the causes and consequences of framing effects. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

[1]  H. Simon,et al.  Motivational and emotional controls of cognition. , 1967, Psychological review.

[2]  Richard M. Harris.  Answering questions containing marked and unmarked adjectives and adverbs. , 1973 .

[3]  Elizabeth F Loftus,et al.  Leading questions and the eyewitness report , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[5]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Reasons for confidence. , 1980 .

[6]  R. Thaler.  Toward a positive theory of consumer choice , 1980 .

[7]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[8]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. , 1982, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  A. Tversky,et al.  The Psychology of Preferences , 1982 .

[10]  P. Herr,et al.  On the consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effects , 1983 .

[11]  M. Bazerman,et al.  The Effects of Framing and Negotiator Overconfidence on Bargaining Behaviors and Outcomes , 1985 .

[12]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  Framing effects in judgment tasks with varying amounts of information , 1985 .

[13]  J. Bargh,et al.  Nature of Priming Effects on Categorization , 1985 .

[14]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. , 1986 .

[15]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  Framing effects in decisions with completely and incompletely described alternatives , 1986 .

[16]  Philip Bobko,et al.  Contextual effects on escalation processes in public sector decision making , 1986 .

[17]  J. Klayman,et al.  Confirmation, Disconfirmation, and Informa-tion in Hypothesis Testing , 1987 .

[18]  N. S. Fagley,et al.  The effects of decision framing on choice of risky vs certain options , 1987 .

[19]  Paul H. Schurr,et al.  Effects of gain and loss decision frames on risky purchase negotiations. , 1987 .

[20]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  E. E. Jones.  Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior , 1987 .

[22]  J. Landman.  Regret and Elation Following Action and Inaction , 1987 .

[23]  David E. Kanouse,et al.  Negativity in evaluations. , 1987 .

[24]  Richard D. Johnson,et al.  Making judgments when information is missing: inferences, biases, and framing effects. , 1987, Acta psychologica.

[25]  H. Wilke,et al.  The effects of framing social dilemmas as give‐some or take‐some games , 1987 .

[26]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  Associative effects of information framing , 1987 .

[27]  I. Levin,et al.  How information frame influences risky decisions: Between-subjects and within-subject comparisons , 1987 .

[28]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  Information framing effects in social and personal decisions , 1988 .

[29]  William Samuelson,et al.  Status quo bias in decision making , 1988 .

[30]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  The Interaction of Experiential and Situational Factors and Gender in a Simulated Risky Decision-Making Task , 1988 .

[31]  J. Fleishman,et al.  The Effects of Decision Framing and Others' Behavior on Cooperation in a Social Dilemma , 1988 .

[32]  I. Levin,et al.  How Consumers Are Affected by the Framing of Attribute Information Before and After Consuming the Product , 1988 .

[33]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Response Mode, Framing and Information-processing Effects in Risk Assessment , 1988 .

[34]  I. Levin,et al.  Confidence in judgments based on incomplete information: An investigation using both hypothetical and real gambles , 1988 .

[35]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  Beyond Fear Appeals: Negative and Positive Persuasive Appeals to Health and Self‐Esteem , 1988 .

[36]  W. H. Loke.  The effects of framing and incomplete information on judgments , 1989 .

[37]  T. Marteau,et al.  Framing of information: its influence upon decisions of doctors and patients. , 1989, The British journal of social psychology.

[38]  William J. Qualls,et al.  Organizational Climate and Decision Framing An Integrated Approach to Analyzing Industrial Buying Decisions , 1989 .

[39]  Dennis Duchon,et al.  Framing the problem and making decisions: the facts are not enough , 1989 .

[40]  A. Öhman,et al.  Preattentive activation of aversive emotions , 1989 .

[41]  L. Nilsson,et al.  Aversion, avoidance, and anxiety : perspective on aversively motivated behavior , 1989 .

[42]  L. Siminoff,et al.  Effects of outcome framing on treatment decisions in the real world: impact of framing on adjuvant breast cancer decisions. , 1989, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[43]  B. Hailey,et al.  The Effects of Message Framing and Feelings of Susceptibility to Breast Cancer on Reported Frequency of Breast Self-Examination , 1989, International quarterly of community health education.

[44]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Windows of vulnerability or cognitive illusions? Cognitive processes and the nuclear arms race , 1989 .

[45]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  Risk taking, frame of reference, and characterization of victim groups in AIDS treatment decisions , 1990 .

[46]  Janet A. Sniezek,et al.  The effect of choosing on confidence in choice , 1990 .

[47]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[48]  P. Miller,et al.  The Effect of Framing on Choice , 1990 .

[49]  G. Peeters,et al.  Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Evaluations: The Distinction Between Affective and Informational Negativity Effects , 1990 .

[50]  D. Lauver,et al.  Message framing, dispositional optimism, and follow-up for abnormal Papanicolaou tests. , 1990, Research in nursing & health.

[51]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  The Influence of Message Framing and Issue Involvement , 1990 .

[52]  Kenneth A. Wallston,et al.  Effects of Contract Framing, Motivation to Quit, and Self‐Efficacy on Smoking Reduction1 , 1990 .

[53]  Denise M. Driscoll,et al.  Priming and the Differential Use of Dimensions in Evaluation , 1990 .

[54]  Glenn E. Snelbecker,et al.  Effects of "Framing" on measures of risk tolerance: Financial planners are not immune , 1990 .

[55]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Social cognition, 2nd ed. , 1991 .

[56]  O. John,et al.  Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of negative social information. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[57]  N. S. Fagley,et al.  The Effects of Framing, Problem Variations, and Providing Rationale on Choice , 1991 .

[58]  Michael J. Doane,et al.  Consumer Rationality and the Status Quo , 1991 .

[59]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: the mobilization-minimization hypothesis. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[60]  M. J. Harris.  Controversy and Cumulation: Meta-Analysis and Research on Interpersonal Expectancy Effects , 1991 .

[61]  A. Tversky,et al.  Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model , 1991 .

[62]  V. Reyna,et al.  Fuzzy-trace theory and framing effects in choice: Gist extraction, truncation, and conversion , 1991 .

[63]  S. Schneider,et al.  Framing and conflict: aspiration level contingency, the status quo, and current theories of risky choice. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[64]  H. Montgomery,et al.  Process and structure in human decision making , 1992 .

[65]  C. Stangor,et al.  Accuracy and Expectancy-confirming Processing Orientations and the Development of Stereotypes and Prejudice , 1992 .

[66]  Wing Hong Loke,et al.  Effects of framing and missing information in expert and novice judgment , 1992 .

[67]  Hans Lind,et al.  A note on the robustness of a classical framing result , 1992 .

[68]  Effects of framing and mathematical experience on judgments , 1992 .

[69]  Rolf Mayer.  To win and lose: Linguistic aspects of prospect theory , 1992 .

[70]  B. Rimer,et al.  The impact of mailing psychoeducational materials to women with abnormal mammograms. , 1992, American journal of public health.

[71]  P. Homer,et al.  Message Framing and the Interrelationships among Ad-Based Feelings, Affect, and Cognition , 1992 .

[72]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  Reason-based choice , 1993, Cognition.

[73]  Philip M. J. Reckers,et al.  An examination of tax practitioner decisions: The role of preparer sanctions and framing effects associated with client condition , 1993 .

[74]  Kenneth J. Dunegan.  Framing, cognitive modes, and image theory: Toward an understanding of a glass half full. , 1993 .

[75]  Ola Svenson,et al.  Framing and Time Pressure in Decision Making , 1993 .

[76]  Peter Salovey,et al.  The Influence of Message Framing on Intentions to Perform Health Behaviors , 1993 .

[77]  I. Levin,et al.  Risky decision making and allocation of resources for leukemia and AIDS programs. , 1993, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[78]  N. S. Fagley,et al.  A note concerning reflection effects versus framing effects , 1993 .

[79]  M. E. Tubbs,et al.  Framing Effects and Choice Shifts in Group Decision Making , 1993 .

[80]  Ola Svenson,et al.  Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making , 1993 .

[81]  D. Frisch.  Reasons for framing effects. , 1993 .

[82]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[83]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  AIDS risk perceptions and decision biases. , 1993 .

[84]  T. Gilovich,et al.  The temporal pattern to the experience of regret. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[85]  Vicki M. Bier,et al.  Ambiguity seeking in multi-attribute decisions: Effects of optimism and message framing , 1994 .

[86]  Roger C. Mayer,et al.  Escalation of Commitment and the Framing Effect: An Empirical Investigation , 1994 .

[87]  David J. Klein,et al.  Effects of mood on high elaboration attitude change: The mediating role of likelihood judgments , 1994 .

[88]  A. Tversky.  Contingent preferences: Loss aversion and tradeoff contrast in decision making , 1994 .

[89]  J. Gotlieb,et al.  The Moderating Effects of Message Framing and Source Credibility on the Price-perceived Risk Relationship , 1994 .

[90]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Source dependence in the valuation of objects , 1994 .

[91]  Kazuhisa Takemura,et al.  Influence of Elaboration on the Framing of Decision , 1994 .

[92]  V. J. Steffen,et al.  Practice and Persuasive Frame: Effects on Beliefs, Intention, and Performance of a Cancer Self‐Examination1 , 1994 .

[93]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Message Framing, Self-Discrepancies, and Yielding to Persuasive Messages: The Motivational Significance of Psychological Situations , 1994 .

[94]  J. Pligt,et al.  Influencing risk-preference in decision-making: The effects of framing and salience , 1995 .

[95]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Procedural Justice and Survivors Reactions to Job Layoffs , 1995 .

[96]  Kenneth J. Dunegan.  Image Theory: Testing the Role of Image Compatibility in Progress Decisions , 1995 .

[97]  Yoav Ganzach,et al.  Message framing and buying behavior: A field experiment , 1995 .

[98]  Lauren G. Block,et al.  When to Accentuate the Negative: The Effects of Perceived Efficacy and Message Framing on Intentions to Perform a Health-Related Behavior , 1995 .

[99]  Peter J. Carnevale,et al.  Framing in Resource Dilemmas: Loss Aversion and the Moderating Effects of Sanctions , 1995 .

[100]  Anton Kühberger,et al.  The Framing of Decisions: A New Look at Old Problems , 1995 .

[101]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  The effects of message framing on mammography utilization. , 1995, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[102]  Image Compatibility and the Use of Problem Space Information in Resource Allocation Decisions: Testing a Moderating Effects Model , 1995 .

[103]  Paul W. Paese.  Effects of Framing on Actual Time Allocation Decisions , 1995 .

[104]  Priscilla O'Clock,et al.  An Investigation of Framing and Firm Size on the Auditor's Going Concern Decision , 1995 .

[105]  S. Schneider.  Item Difficulty, Discrimination, and the Confidence-Frequency Effect in a Categorical Judgment Task , 1995 .

[106]  X. T. Wang,et al.  Evolutionary hypotheses of risk-sensitive choice: Age differences and perspective change , 1996 .

[107]  Kenneth J. Dunegan.  Fines, Frames, and Images: Examining Formulation Effects on Punishment Decisions , 1996 .

[108]  I. Levin,et al.  Measuring the Effects of Framing Country-Of-Origin Information: a Process Tracing Approach , 1996 .

[109]  J. Shanteau,et al.  An information processing view of framing effects: The role of causal schemas in decision making , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[110]  Scott Highhouse,et al.  Perspectives, Perceptions, and Risk-Taking Behavior , 1996 .

[111]  Lee Roy Beach,et al.  Differential versus Unit Weighting of Violations, Framing, and the Role of Probability in Image Theory's Compatibility Test , 1996 .

[112]  Scott Highhouse,et al.  Problem Domain and Prospect Frame: Choice under Opportunity versus Threat , 1996 .

[113]  Margaret G. Meloy,et al.  The Distortion of Information during Decisions , 1996 .

[114]  John T. Hazer,et al.  Factors influencing managers' reactions to utility analysis: Effects of SDy method, information frame, and focal intervention. , 1997 .

[115]  N. S. Fagley,et al.  Framing Effects and Arenas of Choice: Your Money or Your Life? , 1997 .

[116]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[117]  A. Kühberger,et al.  The Influence of Framing on Risky Decisions: A Meta-analysis. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.