How Atlatl Darts Behave: Beveled Points and the Relevance of Controlled Experiments

Beveled retouch on stone projectile points has often been considered as a device to spin and stabilize a projectile. A recent paper showed that a beveled point will spin a small shaft under tightly controlled laboratory conditions. However, this experiment has little relevance for real projectiles such as atlatl darts, which flex dramatically and spin unevenly inflight, quite independent of point form. The spinning is related to the flexibility of the dart, which is necessary for spearthrower functión. A beveled point cannot spin a dart in the air, but is likely to cause some rotation when encountering a solid target like flesh. Beveled points are probably not related to spinning either darts or arrows inflight and present a good example of why we need to have both theoretical understanding and experimental observations of details of projectile behavior before interpreting artifacts. Spinning in a carcass could make beveled points more lethal, but the suggestion that beveling mostly results from sharpening and other modification of stone points remains the best explanation.

[1]  Michael J. O'Brien,et al.  The Cultural Transmission of Great Basin Projectile-Point Technology I: An Experimental Simulation , 2008, American Antiquity.

[2]  C. Chapman.  The archaeology of Missouri , 1975 .

[3]  Noel D. Justice,et al.  Stone Age Spear and Arrow Points of the Midcontinental and Eastern United States , 1990 .

[4]  John C. Whittaker,et al.  Levers, Not Springs: How a Spearthrower Works and Why It Matters , 2016 .

[5]  M. J. O’Brien,et al.  The prehistory of Missouri , 1998 .

[6]  Franklin Peale.  On the Stone Implements of the Indians of North America, with a Classification and Description of the Methods of Making Them , 1861 .

[7]  John C. Whittaker,et al.  Weapon trials: the atlatl and experiments in hunting technology , 2010 .

[8]  P. Cattelain.  Hunting during the Upper Paleolithic: Bow, Spearthrower, or Both? , 1997 .

[9]  S. Hughes.  Getting to the point: Evolutionary change in prehistoric weaponry , 1998 .

[10]  D. Morse.  Sloan: A Paleoindian Dalton Cemetery in Arkansas , 2017 .

[11]  B. J. Cundy,et al.  Formal variation in Australian spear and spearthrower technology , 1989 .

[12]  Devin B. Pettigrew.  The Ballistics of Archaic North American Atlatls and Darts , 2015 .

[13]  B. Bradley.  Sloan Site Biface And Projectile Point Technology , 1997 .

[14]  John C. Whittaker,et al.  Atlatl flex: irrelevant , 2006 .

[15]  Carl P. Lipo,et al.  Beveled Projectile Points and Ballistics Technology , 2012, American Antiquity.

[16]  A. J. Conant.  Archaeology of Missouri , 1878 .

[17]  J. B. Sollberger,et al.  Technological Study of Beveled Knives , 1971 .