AN EXAMINATION OF TEACHER ACCEPTANCE OF HANDHELD COMPUTERS

As states and federal legislation have invested in integration of new technologies into education, the teacher’s role as the user of such technologies in the classroom becomes more prominent (Telecommunications Act of 1996). However, relevant prior research suggests that teacher resistance to new technologies remains high. This study explores teachers’ acceptance of handheld computer use, and identifies key intention determinants for using this technology based on a modified version of the technology acceptance model. The new model with five constructs—(1) perceived ease of use, (2) perceived usefulness, (3) subjective norms, (4) intention to use, and (5) dependability— was tested using the handheld computer acceptance survey responses from 45 special education teachers grouped into four groups by experience of using technology for data collection. The results showed that the direct effect of two constructs, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, on intention to use a handheld computer was statistically significant. The dependability factor, which was not included in any prior technology acceptance literature, had a statistically significant effect on perceived ease of use and usefulness, and intention to use a handheld computer, respectively. Groups of participants differed on only subjective norm. Theoretical and practical implications were also discussed.

[1]  Tufan Adiguzel,et al.  The Use and Efficacy of Handheld Computers for School-Based Data Collection: A Literature Review , 2009 .

[2]  R. Branch,et al.  Educational Media and Technology Yearbook , 2019, Educational Media and Technology Yearbook.

[3]  Ann Bell.  Handheld Computers in Schools and Media Centers , 2007 .

[4]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[5]  Terry Anthony Byrd,et al.  PDA usage in healthcare professionals: testing an extended technology acceptance model , 2003, Int. J. Mob. Commun..

[6]  Keenan A. Pituch,et al.  The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[7]  Ralph B. D'Agostino,et al.  Goodness-of-Fit-Techniques , 2020 .

[8]  K. Sahl,et al.  Tracing Teachers’ Use of Technology in a Laptop Computer School: The Interplay of Teacher Beliefs, Social Dynamics, and Institutional Culture , 2002 .

[9]  Richard G. Lomax,et al.  A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling , 2022 .

[10]  Timothy Teo,et al.  Understanding pre-service teachers' computer attitudes: applying and extending the technology acceptance model , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[11]  A. Yuen,et al.  Gender Differences in Teacher Computer Acceptance. , 2002 .

[12]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Understanding and Mitigating Uncertainty in Online Exchange Relationships: A Principal-Agent Perspective , 2007, MIS Q..

[13]  I. Ajzen.  Attitudes, Personality and Behavior , 1988 .

[14]  Tufan Adiguzel,et al.  Are Handheld Computers Dependable? A New Data Collection System for Classroom-Based Observations , 2009 .

[15]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling. , 1995 .

[16]  R. Kline.  Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[17]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  A test of the technology acceptance model: the case of cellular telephone adoption , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[18]  Fotini Paraskeva,et al.  Individual characteristics and computer self-efficacy in secondary education teachers to integrate technology in educational practice , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Sang Hyun Kim,et al.  Moderating effects of Job Relevance and Experience on mobile wireless technology acceptance: Adoption of a smartphone by individuals , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[20]  Stefan E. Schulenberg,et al.  Ethical issues in the use of computerized assessment , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  R. Hoyle.  The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. , 1995 .

[22]  A. Wolfe,et al.  A Framework for Analyzing Dialogues over the Acceptability of Controversial Technologies , 2002 .

[23]  Roy Sterritt,et al.  Autonomic Computing - a means of achieving dependability? , 2003, 10th IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, 2003. Proceedings..

[24]  Darin J Erickson,et al.  Handheld Computers , 2003, Evaluation review.

[25]  Timothy Teo,et al.  Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[26]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[27]  Olivia R. Liu Sheng,et al.  Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[28]  J. Mathew Myers,et al.  Teachers’Attitudes and Use of Multimedia Technology in the Classroom , 2002 .

[29]  G. Cziko,et al.  Teacher Adoption of Technology: A Perceptual Control Theory Perspective , 2001 .

[30]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: a longitudinal study , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[31]  James E. Yao,et al.  Exploring Factors Associated with Wireless Internet via Mobile Technology Acceptance in Mainland China , 2014, Communications of the IIMA.

[32]  Eric W. T. Ngai,et al.  Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[33]  Per E. Pedersen,et al.  Adoption of Mobile Internet Services: An Exploratory Study of Mobile Commerce Early Adopters , 2005, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[34]  Robert Andersson,et al.  Examining user acceptance of computer technology: an empirical study of student teachers , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[35]  Claudia Smarkola,et al.  Technology Acceptance Predictors among Student Teachers and Experienced Classroom Teachers , 2007 .

[36]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  Students' attitudes toward computers: Validation of a computer attitude scale for 16-19 education , 1997, Comput. Educ..

[37]  Yuan Gao,et al.  Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to Educational Hypermedia: A Field Study , 2005 .

[38]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: a note of caution , 1995 .

[39]  Fred D. Davis.  A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems : theory and results , 1985 .

[40]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[41]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[42]  Dave L. Edyburn.  Critical issues in special education technology research: What do we know? What do we need to know? , 2001 .

[43]  Erika S. Trapl,et al.  Use of audio-enhanced personal digital assistants for school-based data collection. , 2005, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[44]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[45]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness , 1993 .

[46]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[47]  William E. Brown,et al.  Improving the Feedback Cycle to Improve Learning in Introductory Biology Using the Digital Dashboard , 2006 .

[48]  Educational Improvement,et al.  New Teacher and Student Roles in the Technology-Supported Classroom , 2007 .

[49]  Brian Randell,et al.  Fundamental Concepts of Dependability , 2000 .

[50]  J. Duncan,et al.  Mitigating risks, visible hans, inevitable disasters, and soft variables: Management research that matters to managers , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[51]  Henryk R. Marcinkiewicz,et al.  Using Subjective Norms To Predict Teachers' Computer Use , 1996 .

[52]  A Min Tjoa,et al.  Managing Time Consistency for Active Data Warehouse Environments , 2001, DaWaK.

[53]  Glenda A. Gunter,et al.  Students' Perceived Ease of Use of an Elearning Management System: An Exogenous or Endogenous Variable? , 2005 .

[54]  Angus S. McDonald,et al.  The impact of individual differences on the equivalence of computer-based and paper-and-pencil educational assessments , 2002, Comput. Educ..