Usability of the Video Head Impulse Test: Lessons From the Population-Based Prospective KORA Study

Objective: The video head impulse test (vHIT) has become a common examination in the work-up for dizziness and vertigo. However, recent studies suggest a number of pitfalls, which seem to reduce vHIT usability. Within the framework of a population-based prospective study with naïve examiners, we investigated the relevance of previously described technical mistakes in vHIT testing, and the effect of experience and training. Methods: Data originates from the KORA (Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg) FF4 study, the second follow-up of the KORA S4 population-based health survey. 681 participants were selected in a case-control design. Three examiners without any prior experience were trained in video head impulse testing. VHIT quality was assessed weekly by an experienced neuro-otologist. Restrictive mistakes (insufficient technical quality restricting interpretation) were noted. Based on these results, examiners received further individual training. Results: Twenty-two of the 681 vHITs (3.2%) were not interpretable due to restrictive mistakes. Restrictive mistakes could be grouped into four categories: slippage, i.e., goggle movement relative to the head (63.6%), calibration problems (18.2%), noise (13.6%), and low velocity of the head impulse (4.6%). The overall rate of restrictive mistakes decreased significantly during the study (12% / examiner within the first 25 tested participants and 2.1% during the rest of the examinations, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Few categories suffice to explain restrictive mistakes in vHIT testing. With slippage being most important, trainers should emphasize the importance of tight goggles. Experience and training seem to be effective in improving vHIT quality, leading to high usability.

[1]  Hamish G. MacDougall,et al.  The Video Head Impulse Test , 2017, Front. Neurol..

[2]  M. Park,et al.  Effect of Goggle Slippage on the Video Head Impulse Test Outcome and Its Mechanisms. , 2017, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[3]  D. Zee,et al.  Impact of artifacts on VOR gain measures by video-oculography in the acute vestibular syndrome. , 2016, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[4]  T. Bruintjes,et al.  Determining vestibular hypofunction: start with the video-head impulse test , 2016, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[5]  E. Schneider,et al.  Age dependent normal horizontal VOR gain of head impulse test as measured with video-oculography , 2015, Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery.

[6]  Georgios Mantokoudis,et al.  VOR Gain by Head Impulse Video-Oculography Differentiates Acute Vestibular Neuritis from Stroke , 2015, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[7]  H. Rambold.  Economic management of vertigo/dizziness disease in a county hospital: video-head-impulse test vs. caloric irrigation , 2015, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[8]  Georgios Mantokoudis,et al.  Quantifying the Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex with Video-Oculography: Nature and Frequency of Artifacts , 2014, Audiology and Neurotology.

[9]  M. Versino,et al.  Artifact avoidance for head impulse testing , 2014, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  Covert Anti-Compensatory Quick Eye Movements during Head Impulses , 2014, PloS one.

[11]  Erich Schneider,et al.  Evaluation of Quantitative Head Impulse Testing Using Search Coils Versus Video-oculography in Older Individuals , 2014, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[12]  P. Trillenberg,et al.  [Video-based head impulse test. Importance for routine diagnostics of patients with vertigo]. , 2013, Der Nervenarzt.

[13]  L. Walther,et al.  [The video head impulse test: first clinical experiences]. , 2013, HNO.

[14]  Georgios Mantokoudis,et al.  Quantitative Video-Oculography to Help Diagnose Stroke in Acute Vertigo and Dizziness: Toward an ECG for the Eyes , 2013, Stroke.

[15]  L. Walther,et al.  Der Video-Kopfimpulstest , 2013, HNO.

[16]  I S Curthoys,et al.  The video head impulse test , 2009, Neurology.

[17]  Hamish G. MacDougall,et al.  Impulsive Testing of Semicircular‐Canal Function Using Video‐oculography , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[18]  K. Bartl,et al.  Head Impulse Testing Using Video‐oculography , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[19]  I S Curthoys,et al.  A clinical sign of canal paresis. , 1988, Archives of neurology.