Assuring Quality/Resisting Quality Assurance: Academics’ responses to ‘quality’ in some Australian universities

Abstract Academics, although committed to quality in research and teaching, continue to resist quality assurance processes within their universities. This apparent paradox reflects a series of disputes surrounding issues of power, definition and efficacy. This article reports on a study of 30 academics from 10 Australian universities and details their responses to, and critiques of, quality assurance processes in their universities. It is argued that until university management, university quality agencies and academic staff in universities draw on mutually agreed understandings of this contested concept—quality—academics will continue to resist quality processes, treating them as games to be played and systems to be fed.

[1]  I. Moses.  Academic Staff Evaluation and Development: A University Case Study , 1988 .

[2]  M. Barrow.  Quality‐management Systems and Dramaturgical Compliance , 1999 .

[3]  J. Newton,et al.  Feeding the Beast or Improving Quality?: Academics' perceptions of quality assurance and quality monitoring , 2000 .

[4]  Richard James,et al.  Quality and Power in Higher Education , 2006 .

[5]  Susan Wright,et al.  Coercive accountability: the rise of audit culture in higher education , 2003 .

[6]  Roy Ballantyne,et al.  Beyond Student Evaluation of Teaching: Identifying and addressing academic staff development needs , 2000 .

[7]  A. Welch,et al.  The academic profession in Australia , 1997 .

[8]  B. Salter,et al.  The Politics of Governance in Higher Education: The Case of Quality Assurance , 2000 .

[9]  That Chameleon 'Quality': The multiple and contradictory discourses of 'quality' policy in Australian higher education , 2001 .

[10]  Barbara Townley,et al.  PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND THE EMERGENCE OF MANAGEMENT , 1993 .

[11]  M. Trow.  Managerialism and the Academic Profession: The Case of England , 1994 .

[12]  S. Roberts,et al.  Higher Education and the Panopticon Paradigm: Quality Assessment as "Disciplinary Technology.". , 1993 .

[13]  Janette Currie.  Higher education governance and management: An Australian study by V. Lynn Meek; Fiona Q. Wood - Book Review , 1998 .

[14]  Yining Chen,et al.  Student Evaluation of Teaching Effectiveness: An assessment of student perception and motivation , 2003 .

[15]  J. Newton,et al.  Views from Below: Academics coping with quality , 2002 .

[16]  R. Bedggood,et al.  Uses and Misuses of Student Opinion Surveys in Eight Australian Universities , 1999 .

[17]  C. Mcinnis,et al.  Australian academics' perspectives on quality and accountability , 1995 .

[18]  Lesley Vidovich,et al.  Changing accountability and autonomy at the 'coal-face' of academic work in Australia , 1998 .

[19]  Paul Trowler,et al.  Academics Responding to Change: New Higher Education Frameworks and Academic Cultures , 1998 .

[20]  Colleen Liston,et al.  Managing Quality and Standards , 1999 .

[21]  T. Selwyn,et al.  Education, Markets, and Managers: A clash of cultures? , 1992 .

[22]  D. Penington.  Managing Quality in Higher Education Institutions of the 21st Century: A Framework for the Future , 1998 .

[23]  J. E. Everett,et al.  Changing attitudes of Australian academics , 1994 .

[24]  Rachel Johnson,et al.  The Authority of the Student Evaluation Questionnaire , 2000 .

[25]  Michelle Carmel Barker,et al.  Measuring Student Quality Variables and the Implications for Management Practices in Higher Education Institutions: an Australian and international student perspective , 1999 .

[26]  Training,et al.  Quality management in universities , 1993 .

[27]  John Hughes,et al.  Transforming Higher Education , 1997 .

[28]  J. Dawkins.  Higher education: a policy discussion paper , 1987 .

[29]  宮本顕二.  在宅酸素療法患者のQOL, THE LUNG , 2002 .