Symbolism and Strategic Change in Academia: The Dynamics of Sensemaking and Influence

This study investigated the uses of sensemaking, influence, and symbolism in launching a strategic change effort at a university. It employed an ethnographic/interpretive approach in examining the ways that symbols, metaphors, and various subtle influence processes were used to lend meaning to concepts and possible courses of action by a task force instrumental to the strategic change process. Two distinct researcher perspectives were used: an “insider” perspective employing several informants along with an active participant-observer and an “outsider” perspective employing several researchers. Both perspectives were brought to bear as a means of countering the “researcher arrogance” that typifies organizational study by lending balanced voice to both insider and outsider interpretations of events. The findings showed that sensemaking and influence emerged as fundamental processes in the instigation of strategic change. Both processes were symbolically based and varied in directionality over the life of the task force (internally directed in the embryonic phases, and externally directed in the mature phases). Contrary to common wisdom, sensemaking and influence emerged as frequently coincident, interdependent processes that were difficult to distinguish from each other. The discovery of the common symbolic base for scnsemaking and influence also indicated that symbols served both expressive and instrumental roles: suggesting that the accepted view of symbols as predominantly expressive devices does not present a complete picture of their dynamic nature. The use of symbolism also was shown simultaneously to reveal and conceal different aspects of the change process, thus providing task force members the means to circumvent resistance while accomplishing desired action. Symbols and metaphors thus facilitated both cognitive understanding and intended action in attempting to “reinstitutionalize” a major public university via the strategic change process. Overall, the study suggests that efforts to stabilize an organizational system in flux from the systematic upheaval represented by strategic change can be understood as the symbolic interplay between sensemaking and influence.

[1]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[2]  C. Mills,et al.  The Theory of Social and Economic Organization , 1948 .

[3]  A. Vidich,et al.  Participant Observation and the Collection and Interpretation of Data , 1955, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[5]  J. Derrida.  Writing and Difference , 1967 .

[6]  Murray Edelman,et al.  The symbolic uses of politics , 1967 .

[7]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[8]  K. Weick.  The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[9]  C. Geertz,et al.  The Interpretation of Cultures , 1973 .

[10]  S. Lukes.  Power: A Radical View , 1974 .

[11]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Organizational Decision Making as a Political Process: The Case of a UniversityBudget. , 1974 .

[12]  R. Rumelt.  Strategy, structure, and economic performance , 1974 .

[13]  J. Spradley,et al.  Conformity and Conflict: Readings in Cultural Anthropology , 1974 .

[14]  P. Berger,et al.  The Homeless Mind: Modernization and Consciousness. , 1974 .

[15]  A. Ortony.  Why Metaphors Are Necessary and Not Just Nice , 1975 .

[16]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  Sten Jönsson,et al.  Designing semi-confusing information systems for organizations in changing environments , 1978 .

[18]  Igor H.Ansoff.  Strategic Management , 1979 .

[19]  R. Daft,et al.  Language and Organization , 1979 .

[20]  J. V. Maanen,et al.  The Fact of Fiction in Organizational Ethnography. , 1979 .

[21]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live By , 1980 .

[22]  S. Ranson.  The Structuring of Organizational Structures. , 1980 .

[23]  C. C. Snow,et al.  Measuring Organizational Strategies: Some Theoretical and Methodological Problems , 1980 .

[24]  M R Louis,et al.  Surprise and sense making: what newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. , 1980, Administrative science quarterly.

[25]  J. McCann.  Strategies for Change: Logical Incrementalism , 1980 .

[26]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Power in University Budgeting: A Replication and Extension. , 1980 .

[27]  J. Pfeffer.  Management as symbolic action: the creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms , 1981 .

[28]  J. March,et al.  Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol. , 1981 .

[29]  R. Evered,et al.  Alternative Perspectives in the Organizational Sciences: “Inquiry from the Inside” and “Inquiry from the Outside” , 1981 .

[30]  L. Smircich,et al.  Leadership: The Management of Meaning , 1982, The Journal of applied behavioral science.

[31]  Clifton F. Conrad,et al.  Grounded Theory: An Alternative Approach to Research in Higher Education , 2017 .

[32]  Patricia Riley,et al.  A Structurationist Account of Political Culture , 1983 .

[33]  Liam Fahey,et al.  Toward understanding strategic issue diagnosis , 1983 .

[34]  Noel M. Tichy,et al.  Managing strategic change , 1983 .

[35]  Marshall W. Meyer,et al.  Power in Organizations. , 1982 .

[36]  J. M. Beyer,et al.  Studying Organizational Cultures Through Rites and Ceremonials , 1984 .

[37]  John V. Seidel,et al.  THE ETHNOGRAPH: A computer program for the analysis of qualitative data , 1984 .

[38]  D. Whetten.  Effective Administrators: Good Management on the College Campus , 1984 .

[39]  A. D. Meyer,et al.  Mingling decision making metaphors. , 1984, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[40]  Stephen R. Axley.  Managerial and Organizational Communication in Terms of the Conduit Metaphor , 1984 .

[41]  J. Bartunek.  Changing Interpretive Schemes and Organizational Restructuring: The Example of a Religious Order , 1984 .

[42]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation , 1985 .

[43]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Of strategies, deliberate and emergent , 1985, Strategic Management Journal.

[44]  L. Smircich,et al.  Strategic Management in an Enacted World , 1985 .

[45]  M. Firsirotu,et al.  HOW TO IMPLEMENT RADICAL STRATEGIES IN LARGE ORGANIZATIONS , 1985 .

[46]  Peter J. Frost,et al.  Making Sense of Organizational Symbolism@@@Organizational Symbolism (Monographs in Organizational Behavior and Industrial Relations, Vol. 1). , 1985 .

[47]  M. Agar.  Speaking of ethnography , 1985 .

[48]  Linda S. Lotto.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods , 1986 .

[49]  A. Donnellon,et al.  Communication, Meaning, and Organized Action. , 1986 .

[50]  L. Vogel,et al.  Strategy and Structure , 1986 .

[51]  J. Alexander,et al.  Images of Organization , 1988 .

[52]  J. Walsh,et al.  The Role of Negotiated Belief Structures in Strategy Making , 1986 .

[53]  W. Scott.  The Adolescence of Institutional Theory. , 1987 .

[54]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[55]  J. Dutton,et al.  THE CREATION OF MOMENTUM FOR CHANGE THROUGH THE PROCESS OF STRATEGIC ISSUE DIAGNOSIS , 1987 .

[56]  James P. Walsh,et al.  Selectivity and selective perception: An investigation of managers''belief structures and informatio , 1988 .

[57]  John Lazar,et al.  Conformity and conflict , 1988 .

[58]  RELEVANCE OF SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONIST APPROACH IN UNDERSTANDING POWER: A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS[1] , 1988 .

[59]  Dennis K. Mumby,et al.  Communication and Power in Organizations: Discourse, Ideology, and Domination , 1990 .

[60]  Ari Ginsberg,et al.  Measuring and modelling changes in strategy: Theoretical foundations and empirical directions , 1988 .

[61]  Larry E. Greiner,et al.  New CEO intervention and dynamics of deliberate strategic change , 1989 .

[62]  Frances J. Milliken.  Perceiving and interpreting environmental change: An examination of college administrators''interpre , 1990 .

[63]  G. Johnson.  Managing Strategic Change; The Role of Symbolic Action , 1990 .

[64]  Lynn A. Isabella.  Evolving Interpretations as a Change Unfolds: How Managers Construe Key Organizational Events , 1990 .

[65]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Multiparadigm Perspectives on Theory Building , 1990 .

[66]  J. Dutton,et al.  Keeping An Eye on the Mirror: Image and Identity In Organizational Adaptation , 1991 .

[67]  Chao-chuan Chen,et al.  The Construction of Leadership Images in the Popular Press: The Case of Donald Burr and People Express. , 1991 .

[68]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation , 1991 .

[69]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1992 .

[70]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Strategic Sensemaking and Organizational Performance: Linkages Among Scanning, Interpretation, Action, and Outcomes , 1993 .

[71]  R. Daft.  Why I Recommended That Your Manuscript Be Rejected and What You Can Do about it , 1995 .

[72]  Robert I Westwood,et al.  Power, politics and influence , 2018, Leadership.