A New Method for Estimation of Involved BSAs for Obese and Normal-Weight Patients With Burn Injury

An accurate measurement of BSA involved in patients injured by burns is critical in determining initial fluid requirements, nutritional needs, and criteria for tertiary center admissions. The rule of nines and the Lund-Browder chart are commonly used to calculate the BSA involved. However, their accuracy in all patient populations, namely obese patients, remains to be proven. Detailed BSA measurements were obtained from 163 adult patients according to linear formulas defined previously for individual body segments. Patients were then grouped based on body mass index (BMI). The contribution of individual body segments to the TBSA was determined based on BMI, and the validity of existing measurement tools was examined. Significant errors were found when comparing all groups with the rule of nines, which overestimated the contribution of the head and arms to the TBSA while underestimating the trunk and legs for all BMI groups. A new rule is proposed to minimize error, assigning 5% of the TBSA to the head and 15% of the TBSA to the arms across all BMI groups, while alternating the contribution of the trunk/legs as follows: normal-weight 35/45%, obese 40/40%, and morbidly obese 45/35%. Current modalities used to determine BSA burned are subject to significant errors, which are magnified as BMI increases. This new method provides increased accuracy in estimating the BSA involved in patients with burn injury regardless of BMI.

[1]  W. Monafo Initial management of burns. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  P. Mollison,et al.  Survival of transfused red cells previously stored for long periods in the frozen state. , 1952, Lancet.

[3]  L. Bogár,et al.  FACTORS AFFECTING FLUID REQUIREMENT ON THE FIRST DAY AFTER SEVERE BURN TRAUMA , 2007, ANZ journal of surgery.

[4]  B. Freeman,et al.  Simple formula for the surface area of the body and a simple model for anthropometry , 2005, Clinical anatomy.

[5]  L. Cancio,et al.  Standard variables fail to identify patients who will not respond to fluid resuscitation following thermal injury: brief report. , 2005, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[6]  K. Dunn,et al.  Estimation of breast burn size. , 2005, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  E. Livingston,et al.  Body surface area prediction in normal-weight and obese patients. , 2001, American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism.

[8]  D. D. Bois,et al.  CLINICAL CALORIMETRY: TENTH PAPER A FORMULA TO ESTIMATE THE APPROXIMATE SURFACE AREA IF HEIGHT AND WEIGHT BE KNOWN , 1916 .

[9]  E. Livingston,et al.  Percentage of burned body surface area determination in obese and nonobese patients. , 2000, The Journal of surgical research.

[10]  E. Gehan,et al.  Estimation of human body surface area from height and weight. , 1970, Cancer chemotherapy reports.

[11]  Human body surface area: a theoretical approach , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[12]  B. Bailey,et al.  Estimating the surface area of the human body. , 1996, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  D. DuBois,et al.  A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known , 1989 .

[14]  B. Cosman,et al.  THE RULE OF NINES: ITS HISTORY AND ACCURACY , 1968, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[15]  A B WALLACE,et al.  The exposure treatment of burns. , 1951, Lancet.

[16]  A. Cooper,et al.  How well does the Parkland formula estimate actual fluid resuscitation volumes? , 2002, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.