A functional MRI study of the influence of practice on component processes of working memory

Previous neuroimaging studies have shown that neural activity changes with task practice. The types of changes reported have been inconsistent, however, and the neural mechanisms involved remain unclear. In this study, we investigated the influence of practice on different component processes of working memory (WM) using a face WM task. Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) methodology allowed us to examine signal changes from early to late in the scanning session within different task stages (i.e., encoding, delay, retrieval), as well as to determine the influence of different levels of WM load on neural activity. We found practice-related decreases in fMRI signal and effects of memory load occurring primarily during encoding. This suggests that practice improves encoding efficiency, especially at higher memory loads. The decreases in fMRI signal we observed were not accompanied by improved behavioral performance; in fact, error rate increased for high WM load trials, indicating that practice-related changes in activation may occur during a scanning session without behavioral evidence of learning. Our results suggest that practice influences particular component processes of WM differently, and that the efficiency of these processes may not be captured by performance measures alone.

[1]  Moshe Naveh-Benjamin,et al.  Asymmetry between encoding and retrieval processes: Evidence from divided attention and a calibration analysis , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[2]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Transition of Brain Activation from Frontal to Parietal Areas in Visuomotor Sequence Learning , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  A Trial-Based Experimental Design for fMRI , 1997, NeuroImage.

[4]  Susanne M. Jaeggi,et al.  Does excessive memory load attenuate activation in the prefrontal cortex? Load-dependent processing in single and dual tasks: functional magnetic resonance imaging study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[5]  K J Friston,et al.  The predictive value of changes in effective connectivity for human learning. , 1999, Science.

[6]  C. Chabris,et al.  Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Long-term working memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[8]  N. Jausovec,et al.  Spatiotemporal brain activity related to intelligence: a low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography study. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[10]  M. Tarr,et al.  Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  J. Pine,et al.  Chunking mechanisms in human learning , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Nobuko Kemmotsu,et al.  Functional MRI of motor sequence acquisition: effects of learning stage and performance. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[13]  M. Torrens.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[14]  D. V. von Cramon,et al.  Motor-learning-related changes in piano players and non-musicians revealed by functional magnetic-resonance signals , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  C H Lücking,et al.  Changes in cortical activation during mirror reading before and after training: an fMRI study of procedural learning. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[16]  R. Passingham,et al.  Learning Arbitrary Visuomotor Associations: Temporal Dynamic of Brain Activity , 2001, NeuroImage.

[17]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The Influence of Working-Memory Demand and Subject Performance on Prefrontal Cortical Activity , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  Miranda Van Turennout,et al.  Searching for the neural correlates of object priming , 2002 .

[19]  T. Bussey,et al.  Role of prefrontal cortex in a network for arbitrary visuomotor mapping , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  Hugh Garavan,et al.  Practice‐related functional activation changes in a working memory task , 2000, Microscopy research and technique.

[21]  M Naveh-Benjamin,et al.  Divided attention during encoding and retrieval: differential control effects? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  T. Shallice,et al.  Face repetition effects in implicit and explicit memory tests as measured by fMRI. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[24]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Learning-related neuronal responses in prefrontal cortex studied with functional neuroimaging. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The acquisition of skilled motor performance: fast and slow experience-driven changes in primary motor cortex. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Empirical analyses of BOLD fMRI statistics. I. Spatially unsmoothed data collected under null-hypothesis conditions. , 1997, NeuroImage.

[27]  G. Berns,et al.  Brain regions responsive to novelty in the absence of awareness. , 1997, Science.

[28]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning , 1995, Nature.

[29]  J. Tracy,et al.  A comparison of 'Early' and 'Late' stage brain activation during brief practice of a simple motor task. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[30]  S. Petersen,et al.  The effects of practice on the functional anatomy of task performance. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  W. Pauli,et al.  Theory Of Relativity , 1959 .

[32]  John R. Anderson.  Acquisition of cognitive skill. , 1982 .

[33]  E. Miller,et al.  Effects of Visual Experience on the Representation of Objects in the Prefrontal Cortex , 2000, Neuron.

[34]  R. Glassman,et al.  A working memory “theory of relativity”: elasticity in temporal, spatial, and modality dimensions conserves item capacity in radial maze, verbal tasks, and other cognition , 1999, Brain Research Bulletin.

[35]  L. Squire,et al.  The Neuropsychology of Memory , 1990 .

[36]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The Variability of Human, BOLD Hemodynamic Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[37]  I. Johnsrude,et al.  The problem of functional localization in the human brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[38]  M. Buchsbaum,et al.  Regional glucose metabolic changes after learning a complex visuospatial/motor task: a positron emission tomographic study , 1992, Brain Research.

[39]  B. Postle,et al.  Using event-related fMRI to assess delay-period activity during performance of spatial and nonspatial working memory tasks. , 2000, Brain research. Brain research protocols.

[40]  Russell A Poldrack,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries and individual differences in visual concept learning as measured by functional MRI , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  T. Klingberg,et al.  Increased prefrontal and parietal activity after training of working memory , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  M. P Milham,et al.  Practice-related effects demonstrate complementary roles of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortices in attentional control , 2003, NeuroImage.

[43]  B. Postle,et al.  Prefrontal cortical contributions to working memory: evidence from event-related fMRI studies , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  Nick F. Ramsey,et al.  Functional Anatomical Correlates of Controlled and Automatic Processing , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  R. Knight,et al.  Frontal-parietal event-related potential changes associated with practising a novel visuomotor task. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[46]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The Inferential Impact of Global Signal Covariates in Functional Neuroimaging Analyses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[47]  S. Petersen,et al.  Practice-related changes in human brain functional anatomy during nonmotor learning. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[48]  M Ingvar,et al.  Dynamic changes in the functional anatomy of thehuman brain during recall of abstract designs related topractice , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[49]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Characterizing the neural mechanisms of skill learning and repetition priming: evidence from mirror reading. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[50]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Functional Mapping of Sequence Learning in Normal Humans , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[51]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Neural correlates of motor memory consolidation. , 1997, Science.

[52]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Dissecting Contributions of Prefrontal Cortex and Fusiform Face Area to Face Working Memory , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[53]  Carol A. Seger,et al.  Striatal activation during acquisition of a cognitive skill. , 1999, Neuropsychology.

[54]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Brain-behavior relationships: evidence from practice effects in spatial stimulus-response compatibility. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[55]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Automatic and controlled processing revisited. , 1984, Psychological review.

[56]  J. Desmond,et al.  The neural basis of visual skill learning: an fMRI study of mirror reading. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[57]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited—Again , 1995, NeuroImage.

[58]  Alex Martin,et al.  Long-lasting cortical plasticity in the object naming system , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[59]  M. Buchsbaum,et al.  Intelligence and changes in regional cerebral glucose metabolic rate following learning , 1992 .

[60]  R. Poldrack.  Imaging Brain Plasticity: Conceptual and Methodological Issues— A Theoretical Review , 2000, NeuroImage.

[61]  E. Miller,et al.  Neural Activity in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex during Associative Learning , 1998, Neuron.