A prospective whole-mixture approach to assess risk of the food and chemical exposome

Many widely used chemicals result in ubiquitous human exposure from multiple sources, including diet. Legislation mainly deals with the toxicological evaluation of single substances owing to a methodological and conceptual lack of alternatives, and does so within defined silos subject to over 40 distinct regulations in the EU alone. Furthermore, much of the research and many of the initiatives concerned with the assessment and evaluation of chemical mixtures and their potential effects on human health rely on retrospective analysis. Here we propose an approach for the prospective identification, assessment and regulation of mixtures relevant to human health. We address two distinct aspects of toxicology—which chemicals actually do occur together, and how potential mixture-related health hazards can be predicted—with an adapted concept of the exposome and large-scale hazard screens. The proactive use of the likelihood of co-exposure, together with the new approach of methods-based testing, may be a timely and feasible way of identifying those substances and mixtures where hazards may have been overlooked and regulatory action is needed. Ideally, we would generate co-exposure patterns for specific consumer groups, depending on lifestyle and dietary habits, to assess the specific risk of identified mixtures. Continuous and chronic exposure to mixtures of multiple chemicals, particularly from food, medicine and cleaning products, are of concern. A proactive combinatorial approach to identify, assess and regulate the likelihood of exposure and potential health effects is presented.

[1]  Chunhong Huang,et al.  Synergistic strategies of predominant toxins in snake venoms. , 2018, Toxicology letters.

[2]  T. Brüning,et al.  Phthalate metabolites in urine of children and adolescents in Germany. Human biomonitoring results of the German Environmental Survey GerES V, 2014-2017. , 2020, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.

[3]  H. Guillou,et al.  Effects of pesticide mixtures in human and animal models: An update of the recent literature. , 2016, Chemico-biological interactions.

[4]  M. Feeley,et al.  Mixture effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and polychlorinated biphenyl congeners in rats. , 2001, Chemosphere.

[5]  Antonio F Hernández,et al.  Human exposure to chemical mixtures: Challenges for the integration of toxicology with epidemiology data in risk assessment. , 2017, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[6]  Ann M. Richard,et al.  Using prepared mixtures of ToxCast chemicals to evaluate non-targeted analysis (NTA) method performance , 2019, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[7]  S. Cobbina,et al.  Toxicity assessment due to sub-chronic exposure to individual and mixtures of four toxic heavy metals. , 2015, Journal of hazardous materials.

[8]  Vikas Kumar,et al.  Hepatotoxicity of the pesticides imazalil, thiacloprid and clothianidin - Individual and mixture effects in a 28-day study in female Wistar rats. , 2020, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[9]  D. Hood,et al.  Environmental contaminant-mixture effects on CNS development, plasticity, and behavior. , 2004, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[10]  J. Furr,et al.  Dose Addition Models Based on Biologically Relevant Reductions in Fetal Testosterone Accurately Predict Postnatal Reproductive Tract Alterations by a Phthalate Mixture in Rats. , 2015, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[11]  A. Andriolo,et al.  The combination of atorvastatin and ethanol is not more hepatotoxic to rats than the administration of each drug alone. , 2007, Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas.

[12]  David M. Reif,et al.  In Vitro Screening of Environmental Chemicals for Targeted Testing Prioritization: The ToxCast Project , 2009, Environmental health perspectives.

[13]  Matthias Greiner,et al.  Regulatory toxicology in the twenty-first century: challenges, perspectives and possible solutions , 2015, Archives of Toxicology.

[14]  D. Schmähl Combination effects in chemical carcinogenesis (experimental results). , 1976, Oncology.

[15]  S. H. Bennekou,et al.  Guidance on harmonised methodologies for human health, animal health and ecological risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals , 2019, EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority.

[16]  J. Bailar,et al.  Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[17]  A. Luch,et al.  “Drugs on oxygen”: an update and perspective on the role of cytochrome P450 testing in pharmacology , 2012, Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.

[18]  L. Smirnova,et al.  Cellular resilience. , 2015, ALTEX.

[19]  Alicia Paini,et al.  Regulatory assessment and risk management of chemical mixtures: challenges and ways forward , 2019, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[20]  A. Braeuning,et al.  More than additive effects on liver triglyceride accumulation by combinations of steatotic and non-steatotic pesticides in HepaRG cells , 2021, Archives of Toxicology.

[21]  Shiew-Mei Huang,et al.  Predicting Drug–Drug Interactions: An FDA Perspective , 2009, The AAPS Journal.

[22]  Martin Paparella,et al.  Uncertainties of testing methods: What do we (want to) know about carcinogenicity? , 2016, ALTEX.

[23]  J. Schlatter,et al.  Deviation from additivity in mixture toxicity: relevance of nonlinear dose-response relationships and cell line differences in genotoxicity assays with combinations of chemical mutagens and gamma-radiation. , 2002, Environmental health perspectives.

[24]  Wolfgang Ahrens,et al.  The German National Cohort: Aims, study des , 2014 .

[25]  W. Brack,et al.  Non-targeted mercapturic acid screening in urine using LC-MS/MS with matrix effect compensation by postcolumn infusion of internal standard (PCI-IS) , 2019, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[26]  D. Muir,et al.  Toward a Global Understanding of Chemical Pollution: A First Comprehensive Analysis of National and Regional Chemical Inventories. , 2020, Environmental science & technology.

[27]  Patience Browne,et al.  Application of Adverse Outcome Pathways to U.S. EPA’s Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program , 2017, Environmental health perspectives.

[28]  A. Kortenkamp Ten Years of Mixing Cocktails: A Review of Combination Effects of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals , 2007, Environmental health perspectives.

[29]  New S Tudy The German National Cohort: aims, study design and organization , 2014 .

[30]  Agnes L Karmaus,et al.  Evaluation of food-relevant chemicals in the ToxCast high-throughput screening program. , 2016, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[31]  L. Brewer,et al.  An Overview of Literature Topics Related to Current Concepts, Methods, Tools, and Applications for Cumulative Risk Assessment (2007–2016) , 2017, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[32]  Emma L. Schymanski,et al.  The exposome and health: Where chemistry meets biology , 2020, Science.

[33]  R. Krska,et al.  Towards a dietary-exposome assessment of chemicals in food: An update on the chronic health risks for the European consumer , 2019, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[34]  M. Fang,et al.  Nutritional and Environmental Contaminant Exposure: A Tale of Two Co-Existing Factors for Disease Risks. , 2020, Environmental science & technology.

[35]  Jingchuan Xue,et al.  Towards Mass Spectrometry-Based Chemical Exposome: Current Approaches, Challenges, and Future Directions , 2019, Toxics.

[36]  A. Boobis,et al.  A framework for cumulative risk assessment in the 21st century , 2017, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[37]  Carsten Kneuer,et al.  Statement on advancing the assessment of chemical mixtures and their risks for human health and the environment , 2019, Environment international.

[38]  Kamel Mansouri,et al.  EPA’s non-targeted analysis collaborative trial (ENTACT): genesis, design, and initial findings , 2018, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[39]  J. Antignac,et al.  Receptor-based in vitro activities to assess human exposure to chemical mixtures and related health impacts. , 2020, Environment international.

[40]  J. Kalinowski,et al.  Assessment of mixture toxicity of (tri)azoles and their hepatotoxic effects in vitro by means of omics technologies , 2019, Archives of Toxicology.

[41]  Stephen Fowler,et al.  Progress in Prediction and Interpretation of Clinically Relevant Metabolic Drug-Drug Interactions: a Minireview Illustrating Recent Developments and Current Opportunities , 2017, Current Pharmacology Reports.

[42]  Andreas Bender,et al.  Modelling of compound combination effects and applications to efficacy and toxicity: state-of-the-art, challenges and perspectives. , 2016, Drug discovery today.

[43]  Sabine Martin,et al.  Comparative cytotoxicity of plant protection products and their active ingredients. , 2019, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[44]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Network-based prediction of drug combinations , 2019, Nature Communications.

[45]  Erik Lebret,et al.  Current EU research activities on combined exposure to multiple chemicals☆ , 2018, Environment international.

[46]  T. K. Jensen,et al.  The Odense Child Cohort: aims, design, and cohort profile. , 2015, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[47]  L S McCarty,et al.  Review of the toxicity of chemical mixtures: Theory, policy, and regulatory practice. , 2006, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[48]  T. Heise,et al.  Hepatotoxic combination effects of three azole fungicides in a broad dose range , 2017, Archives of Toxicology.

[49]  Avrum Spira,et al.  The Importance of the Biological Impact of Exposure to the Concept of the Exposome , 2016, Environmental health perspectives.

[50]  Sharlene Matten U.S. EPA’s Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program: Moving forward with high throughput screening assays and computational models , 2016 .

[51]  A. Kortenkamp Low dose mixture effects of endocrine disrupters and their implications for regulatory thresholds in chemical risk assessment. , 2014, Current opinion in pharmacology.

[52]  Alan J. Bergmann,et al.  Discovery of common chemical exposures across three continents using silicone wristbands , 2019, Royal Society Open Science.

[53]  Julien Etienne,et al.  EU Insights Chemical mixtures awareness, understanding and risk perceptions , 2019, EFSA Supporting Publications.

[54]  K. Jayne,et al.  Animal Experimentation: Working Towards a Paradigm Change , 2019 .

[55]  N. Cedergreen Quantifying Synergy: A Systematic Review of Mixture Toxicity Studies within Environmental Toxicology , 2014, PloS one.

[56]  Michael Faust,et al.  Should the scope of human mixture risk assessment span legislative/regulatory silos for chemicals? , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[57]  Raymond S. H. Yang,et al.  Critical analysis of literature on low-dose synergy for use in screening chemical mixtures for risk assessment , 2011, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[58]  B. Escher,et al.  Effect‐Based Trigger Values for Mixtures of Chemicals in Surface Water Detected with In Vitro Bioassays , 2020, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[59]  Mark D. Hoover,et al.  Use of the "Exposome" in the Practice of Epidemiology: A Primer on -Omic Technologies. , 2016, American journal of epidemiology.

[60]  Stephen M. Rappaport,et al.  Biomonitoring in the Era of the Exposome , 2016, Environmental health perspectives.

[61]  Antony J. Williams,et al.  Integrating tools for non-targeted analysis research and chemical safety evaluations at the US EPA , 2017, Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology.