Adaptive reuse of buildings: Eco-efficiency assessment of retrofit strategies for alternative uses of an historic building

Abstract Adaptive reuse is a process of retrofitting old buildings for new uses. Existing residential buildings in European cities are often being retrofitted to be adapted as office buildings whilst keeping its historical value. The main goal of this article is to perform an eco-efficiency assessment for a historic building to assess alternative retrofit strategies and uses, including investigate how occupancy influences the economic and environmental life-cycle performance of retrofit strategies. A life-cycle model was implemented to a single-family house from the beginning of the 20th century retrofitted to be used as an office building. Nine occupancy scenarios combined with alternative insulation levels were defined. The occupancy scenarios are defined by level of occupancy (office use, and low and high residential occupancy) and set-points (18 °C, 20 °C and 22 °C for heating combined with 23 °C, 25 °C and 27 °C for cooling). The insulation levels comprise alternative roof insulation levels (0, 40, 80 and 120 mm) and exterior-wall inside insulation levels (0, 40 and 80 mm). Eco-efficiency assessment shows that higher comfort conditions result in better eco-efficient results in all types of occupancy. Retrofit strategies with more than 80 mm of roof insulation are not eco-efficient. In summary, different retrofit strategies should be adopted to maximize savings and minimize environmental impacts depending on the type of use and occupancy level. Therefore, it is crucial to take into account both the economic and environmental perspective to support a comprehensive retrofit decision process.

[1]  Raymond J. Cole,et al.  Life-cycle energy use in office buildings , 1996 .

[2]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[3]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  Life cycle primary energy analysis of residential buildings , 2010 .

[4]  A. Uihlein,et al.  Environmental Improvement Potentials of Residential Buildings (IMPRO-Building) , 2008 .

[5]  Lei Xu,et al.  The life-cycle assessment of a single-storey retail building in Canada , 2012 .

[6]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Environmental impacts of the UK residential sector: Life cycle assessment of houses , 2012 .

[7]  Niccolò Aste,et al.  Energy retrofit of commercial buildings: case study and applied methodology , 2013 .

[8]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Lifecycle primary energy analysis of low-energy timber building systems for multi-storey residential buildings , 2014 .

[9]  Oscar Ortiz,et al.  Operational energy in the life cycle of residential dwellings: The experience of Spain and Colombia , 2010 .

[10]  Eddie C.M. Hui,et al.  A methodology for eco-efficiency evaluation of residential development at city level , 2010 .

[11]  Margaret Jollands,et al.  Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost implication of residential buildings - A review , 2015 .

[12]  Holger König,et al.  Benchmarks for life cycle costs and life cycle assessment of residential buildings , 2012 .

[13]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: modeling challenges and design implications , 2003 .

[14]  Joshua D. Kneifel,et al.  Life-cycle carbon and cost analysis of energy efficiency measures in new commercial buildings , 2010 .

[15]  Brian Norton,et al.  Life-cycle operational and embodied energy for a generic single-storey office building in the UK , 2002 .

[16]  Nemry Francoise,et al.  Environmental Improvement Potential of Residential Buildings , 2008 .

[17]  Fausto Freire,et al.  Comparative life-cycle energy analysis of a new and an existing house: The significance of occupant’s habits, building systems and embodied energy , 2016 .

[18]  English Version,et al.  Sustainability of construction works - Assessment of environmental performance of buildings - Calculation method , 2010 .

[19]  Giuseppe Peter Vanoli,et al.  Design the refurbishment of historic buildings with the cost-optimal methodology: The case study of a XV century Italian building , 2015 .

[20]  Edward Morofsky,et al.  A screening methodology for implementing cost effective energy retrofit measures in Canadian office , 2011 .

[21]  Fausto Freire,et al.  Environmental impact trade-offs in building envelope retrofit strategies , 2017, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[22]  Drury B. Crawley,et al.  EnergyPlus: Energy simulation program , 2000 .

[23]  Fausto Freire,et al.  Integrated life-cycle assessment and thermal dynamic simulation of alternative scenarios for the roof retrofit of a house , 2014 .

[24]  Valeria Ibáñez-Forés,et al.  Eco-efficiency analysis of the life cycle of interior partition walls: a comparison of alternative solutions , 2016 .

[25]  Anne Grete Hestnes,et al.  Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article , 2007 .

[26]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Quantified Eco-Efficiency , 2007 .

[27]  Rahman Azari Integrated energy and environmental life cycle assessment of office building envelopes , 2014 .

[28]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Assessing the sustainability of Best Available Techniques (BAT): Methodology and application in the ceramic tiles industry , 2013 .

[29]  Ignacio Zabalza Bribián,et al.  Life cycle assessment of building materials: Comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential , 2011 .

[30]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Factors influencing the adaptive re‐use of buildings , 2011 .

[31]  Borong Lin,et al.  Integrated assessment method for building life cycle environmental and economic performance , 2008 .