Novel interventions to reduce re-infection in women with chlamydia: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to determine whether postal testing kits (PTKs) or patient-delivered partner therapy (PDPT) for partners of women with Chlamydia trachomatis reduce re-infection rates in women, compared with partner notification by patient referral. METHODS Three hundred and thirty women testing positive for chlamydia, at clinics for genitourinary medicine, family planning and termination of pregnancy in Edinburgh, were randomized to one of three partner interventions: patient referral, PTK (partners post urine for testing) or PDPT (1 g azithromycin for partners). Women submitted urine for chlamydia testing every 3 months. The primary outcome was re-infection assessed as time to first positive result by the Cox proportional hazard regression. The proportion of partners tested or treated with each intervention was determined. RESULTS Out of 330 women, 215 (65%) were retested over 12 months. There were 32 of 215 women (15%) who retested positive (7, 15 and 10 women from the patient referral, PTK and PDPT groups, respectively). There was no significant difference in re-infection between PDPT versus patient referral (HR 1.32, 95% CI 0.50-3.56), PTK versus patient referral (HR 2.35, 95% CI 0.94-5.88) or PDPT versus PTK (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.24-1.24). There was no significant difference in the proportion of partners confirmed tested/treated between the patient referral (34%) and PTK (41%, P = 0.32) or PDPT (42%, P = 0.28) groups. CONCLUSIONS PTK and PDPT do not reduce re-infection rates in women with chlamydia compared with patient referral. However, PDPT may offer other advantages such as simplicity and cost compared with patient referral.

[1]  L. Melvin,et al.  Willingness of gynaecologists, doctors in family planning, GPs, practice nurses and pharmacists to adopt novel interventions for treating sexual partners of women with chlamydia , 2007, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[2]  Anne M Johnson,et al.  How much do delayed healthcare seeking, delayed care provision, and diversion from primary care contribute to the transmission of STIs? , 2007, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[3]  Aijing Shang,et al.  Improved effectiveness of partner notification for patients with sexually transmitted infections: systematic review , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  E. Mulholland,et al.  Stigma, Sexually Transmitted Infections and Attendance at the GUM Clinic , 2007, Journal of health psychology.

[5]  A. Davies,et al.  Incidence and reinfection rates of genital chlamydial infection among women aged 16–24 years attending general practice, family planning and genitourinary medicine clinics in England: a prospective cohort study by the Chlamydia Recall Study Advisory Group , 2006, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[6]  H. Young,et al.  Genital infection in male partners of women with chlamydial infection , 2006, International journal of STD & AIDS.

[7]  T. Farley,et al.  Patient-delivered partner treatment for male urethritis: a randomized, controlled trial. , 2005, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[8]  K. Holmes,et al.  Concurrent sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in sex partners of patients with selected STIs: implications for patient-delivered partner therapy. , 2005, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[9]  K. Holmes,et al.  Effect of expedited treatment of sex partners on recurrent or persistent gonorrhea or chlamydial infection. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  F. Olesen,et al.  Managing partners of people diagnosed with Chlamydia trachomatis: a comparison of two partner testing methods , 2003, Sexually transmitted infections.

[11]  J. Cassell,et al.  Sex differences in the experience of testing positive for genital chlamydia infection: a qualitative study with implications for public health and for a national screening programme , 2003, Sexually transmitted infections.

[12]  J. Fortenberry,et al.  Patient-Delivered Partner Treatment With Azithromycin to Prevent Repeated Chlamydia trachomatis Infection Among Women: A Randomized, Controlled Trial , 2003, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[13]  J. Douglas,et al.  Incidence and Repeat Infection Rates of Chlamydia trachomatis Among Male and Female Patients in an STD Clinic: Implications for Screening and Rescreening , 2002, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[14]  T. Farley,et al.  Effectiveness of patient delivered partner medication for preventing recurrent Chlamydia trachomatis. , 1998, Sexually transmitted infections.

[15]  F. Olesen,et al.  Home sampling versus conventional contact tracing for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis infection in male partners of infected women: randomised study , 1998, BMJ.

[16]  R. Rank,et al.  Increased Incidence of Oviduct Pathology in the Guinea Pig After Repeat Vaginal Inoculation With the Chlamydial Agent of Guinea Pig Inclusion Conjunctivitis , 1995, Sexually Transmitted Diseases.

[17]  M. Blythe,et al.  Recurrent genitourinary chlamydial infections in sexually active female adolescents. , 1992, The Journal of pediatrics.

[18]  L. Forssman,et al.  Contact Tracing in the Control of Genital Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection , 1991, International journal of STD & AIDS.

[19]  K. Holmes,et al.  The Effects of Chlamydia trachomatis on the Female Reproductive Tract of the Macaca nemestrina After a Single Tubal Challenge Following Repeated Cervical Inoculations , 1990, Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[20]  V. Carstairs,et al.  Deprivation and health in Scotland. , 1990, Health bulletin.