CRYPTIC FEMALE CHOICE IN THE YELLOW DUNG FLY SCATHOPHAGA STERCORARIA (L.)

Abstract Both female choice and male-male competition may take place during reproduction in many species. Female choice tends to be less obvious than male-male competition and consequently has received less attention from researchers. The opportunity for cryptic female choice arises after multiple insemination. Through postcopulatory processes, a female could alter the pattern of paternity among her offspring so that it does not directly reflect the different contributions of sperm made by her mates. To be able to determine if a female alters the relative sperm contributions of her mates, the behaviors and influences of the males must therefore be first taken into account. The interest of each male is to father all the offspring, and the interest of each female is to maximize paternal quality. Female yellow dung flies have complex internal reproductive tracts that may give them considerable control over the fertilization success of stored sperm from different males. In laboratory trials to date, the last male to mate has usually been most successful. In the present study, cryptic choice occurred in Scathophaga stercoraria and the pattern of choice was consistent with previously reported results. The fertilization success of a female's second mate (P2) was substantially larger if a female was kept at constant temperature and if the second male was genetically similar to her at the phosphoglucomutase (Pgm) locus. Females from the field normally have three spermathecae, but some have four. Lines were bred to have either three or four spermathecae. Flies from the different lines were crossed to generate females with similar genetic backgrounds that had either three or four spermathecae. P2 was significantly lower for high-quality females, that is, those that laid larger-than-average-clutches, with four spermathecae than for low-quality females with four spermathecae; female quality had no influence on P2 for females with three spermathecae. The results suggest that only large females may benefit from increased spermathecae number by being able to act against male interests. Females may only have three spermathecae, even though genetic variation for more is present, because selection for more spermathecae is weak. Corresponding Editor: D. Wheeler

[1]  D. Hosken,et al.  Copula in yellow dung flies (Scathophaga stercoraria): investigating sperm competition models by histological observation. , 2000, Journal of insect physiology.

[2]  P. Ward Sperm length is heritable and sex‐linked in the yellow dung fly (Scathophaga stercoraria) , 2000 .

[3]  B. Hellriegel,et al.  Female-mediated differential sperm storage in a fly with complex spermathecae, Scatophaga stercoraria , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  S. Pitnick,et al.  EVOLUTION OF MULTIPLE KINDS OF FEMALE SPERM‐STORAGE ORGANS IN DROSOPHILA , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  E. Meyer,et al.  Internal female reproductive anatomy and genital interactions during copula in the yellow dung fly, Scathophaga stercoraria (Diptera: Scathophagidae) , 1999 .

[6]  D. Hosken,et al.  Female accessory reproductive gland activity in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria (L.). , 1999, Journal of insect physiology.

[7]  G. Wilkinson,et al.  Coevolution of sperm and female reproductive tract morphology in stalk–eyed flies , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  E. Charnov,et al.  Optimal copula duration in yellow dung flies: effects of female size and egg content , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  G. Parker,et al.  Sperm Displacement in the Yellow Dung Fly, Scatophaga stercoraria: An Investigation of Male and Female Processes , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[10]  P. Ward,et al.  Maternal effects and their consequences for offspring fitness in the Yellow Dung Fly , 1999 .

[11]  T. Birkhead CRYPTIC FEMALE CHOICE: CRITERIA FOR ESTABLISHING FEMALE SPERM CHOICE , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  P. Ward Intraspecific variation in sperm size characters , 1998, Heredity.

[13]  B. Hellriegel,et al.  Complex Female Reproductive Tract Morphology: Its Possible Use in Postcopulatory Female Choice , 1998 .

[14]  P. Eady,et al.  Female genotype affects male success in sperm competition , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  W. Blanckenhorn Effects of temperature on growth, development and diapause in the yellow dung fly – against all the rules? , 1997, Oecologia.

[16]  M. Otronen Sperm numbers, their storage and usage in the fly Dryomyza anilis , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  W. Eberhard Female control : sexual selection by cryptic female choice , 1996 .

[18]  D. W. Zeh,et al.  The evolution of polyandry I: intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  W. Blanckenhorn,et al.  The genetic component of copula duration in the yellow dung fly , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  G. Parker,et al.  Sperm competition or sperm selection: no evidence for female influence over paternity in yellow dung flies Scatophaga stercoraria , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[21]  A. Pomiankowski,et al.  The genetic basis of female mate preferences , 1995 .

[22]  G. Parker,et al.  Evolution of phenotypic optima and copula duration in dungflies , 1994, Nature.

[23]  P. Ward,et al.  Variation in sperm length in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria (L) , 1993 .

[24]  T. Eisner,et al.  Postcopulatory sexual selection in an arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix). , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  A. Møller,et al.  Female control of paternity. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[26]  A. Møller,et al.  Sperm competition in birds : evolutionary causes and consequences , 1992 .

[27]  G. Parker Marginal Value Theorem with Exploitation Time Costs: Diet, Sperm Reserves, and Optimal Copula Duration in Dung Flies , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[28]  Leigh W. Simmons,et al.  INDIVIDUAL VARIATION IN SPERM COMPETITION SUCCESS OF YELLOW DUNG FLIES, SCATOPHAGA STERCORARIA , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  G. Parker,et al.  A model of constant random sperm displacement during mating: evidence from Scatophaga , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  L. Simmons,et al.  The heritability of sexually dimorphic traits in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria (L.) , 1991 .

[31]  S. Austad,et al.  Sources of Intraspecific Variation in Sperm Precedence in Red Flour Beetles , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[32]  S. Sakaluk Male Crickets Feed Females to Ensure Complete Sperm Transfer , 1984, Science.

[33]  R. Thornhill Cryptic Female Choice and Its Implications in the Scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[34]  K. Amano Studies on the intraspecific competition in dung-breeding flies : I. Effects of larval density on yellow dung fly, Scatophaga stercoraria L. (Diptera : Scatophagidae) , 1983 .

[35]  L. Simmons,et al.  10 – Sperm Competition in Insects: Mechanisms and the Potential for Selection , 1998 .

[36]  A. Gilburn,et al.  Sexual Selection in Seaweed Flies , 1997 .

[37]  P. Skidmore Insects of the British cow-dung community. , 1991 .

[38]  M. J. Norušis,et al.  SPSS base system user's guide , 1990 .

[39]  S. Blower,et al.  Adaptation at specific loci. IV. Differential mating success among glycolytic allozyme genotypes of Colias butterflies. , 1985, Genetics.

[40]  P. Dawson,et al.  Dietary Effects on Fitness Components at the PGM-1 Locus of TRIBOLIUM CASTANEUM. , 1983, Genetics.

[41]  H. Harris,et al.  Handbook of enzyme electrophoresis in human genetics , 1976 .

[42]  G. S. Kloet,et al.  A Check List of British Insects , 1946, Nature.

[43]  R. Meldola Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.