SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONISM VS. ETHNOMETHODOLOGY

Are ethnomethodology and symbolic interactionism essentially the same? An examination of these perspectives suggests that each offers a unique contribution to sociological knowledge. Although both perspectives have been influenced by pragmatism, ethnomethodology shares affinity with James' philosophy while symbolic interactionism is allied with Dewey's and Mead's. Both perspectives emphasize meaning and constraints, but each offers critically different conceptualizations of them. Symbolic interactionism and ethnomethodology share a verstehen outlook, yet each perspective uses different methods to gain “understanding.” Hence, these perspectives differ philosophically, conceptually, and methodologically.

[1]  H. Blumer.  Mead and Blumer: The Convergent Methodological Perspectives of Social Behaviorism and Symbolic Interactionism , 1980 .

[2]  W. James,et al.  The will to believe (From The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy). , 2000 .

[3]  F. N. House,et al.  Measurement in Sociology , 1934, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  Hans Vaihinger,et al.  The Philosophy of “As if”: a System of the Theoretical, Practical and Religious Fictions of Mankind , 1924, Nature.

[5]  Basil Bernstein,et al.  ASPECTS OF LANGUAGE AND LEARNING IN THE GENESIS OF THE SOCIAL PROCESS , 1960 .

[6]  W. James.  Essays in radical empiricism and A pluralistic universe , 1967 .

[7]  E. Whittaker,et al.  The silent dialogue , 1968 .

[8]  P. Rock,et al.  The making of symbolic interactionism , 1979 .

[9]  George H. Mead,et al.  Movements of Thought in the Nineteenth Century , 1936 .

[10]  A. Strauss,et al.  Negotiations: Varieties, Contexts, Processes, and Social Order. , 1979 .

[11]  Harvey A. Farberman.  A Criminogenic Market Structure: the Automobile Industry , 1975 .

[12]  Norman K. Denzin,et al.  NOTES ON THE CRIMINOGENIC HYPOTHESIS: A CASE STUDY OF THE AMERICAN LIQUOR INDUSTRY* , 1977 .

[13]  R. L. Schanck.  A study of a community and its groups and institutions conceived of as behaviors of individuals. , 1932 .

[14]  D. Cressey.  Other people's money , 1953 .

[15]  J. Dewey.  Experience and Nature , 1960 .

[16]  David R. Maines,et al.  Social Organization and Social Structure in Symbolic Interactionist Thought , 1977 .

[17]  Theory and method in a study of Argentine fertility , 1974 .

[18]  A. Cicourel.  Cognitive sociology: language and meaning in social interaction , 1976 .

[19]  Melvin Pollner,et al.  The everyday world as a phenomenon , 1970 .

[20]  Clark McPhail,et al.  MEAD VS. BLUMER: THE DIVERGENT METHODOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES OF SOCIAL BEHAVIORISM AND SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONISM* , 1979 .

[21]  William James,et al.  Pragmatism : a new name for some old ways of thinking ; The meaning of truth : a sequel to Pragmatism , 2010 .

[22]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[23]  M. Natanson,et al.  Phenomenology and the social sciences , 1963 .

[24]  J. Dewey.  Individualism Old and New , 1930 .

[25]  G. Mead,et al.  The philosophy of the act , 1938 .

[26]  M. Orne.  On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. , 1962 .

[27]  W. James,et al.  Collected essays and reviews , 1920 .

[28]  E. Wegner,et al.  Making the Grade: The Academic Side of College Life. , 1969 .

[29]  A. Cicourel.  Method and measurement in sociology , 1965 .

[30]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Awareness of Dying , 1966 .

[31]  R. S. Peters.  Nature and conduct , 1975 .

[32]  Jim Schenkein,et al.  Notes on the art of walking , 1974 .

[33]  H. Garfinkel.  Studies in Ethnomethodology , 1968 .

[34]  Charles C. Lemert.  De-centered analysis , 1979 .

[35]  James L. Heap,et al.  On Phenomenological Sociology , 1973 .

[36]  N. Denzin.  Sociological Methods: A Sourcebook , 1978 .

[37]  Harvey Sacks,et al.  An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology , 1972 .

[38]  E. Tiryakian,et al.  Studies in social interaction , 1972 .

[39]  S. Kleinman.  Making Professionals into "Persons" , 1981 .

[40]  Gary Alan Fine,et al.  Rhetorics and Action in Moral Organizations , 1979 .

[41]  Howard S. Becker,et al.  Problems of Inference and Proof in Participant Observations , 1958 .

[42]  H. Becker,et al.  Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. , 1964 .

[43]  B. Barnes,et al.  Whatever should be done with indexical expressions? , 1976 .

[44]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Boys in White: Student Culture in Medical School. , 1962 .

[45]  Richard Herbert Howe,et al.  Max Weber's Elective Affinities: Sociology Within the Bounds of Pure Reason , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[46]  Peter Mchugh,et al.  The Social Ascription of Motives , 1971 .

[47]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[48]  G. P. Stone,et al.  On Methodology and Craftsmanship in the Criticism of Sociological Perspectives , 1974 .

[49]  Ralph L. Blankenship.  Organizational Careers: An Interactionist Perspective* , 1972 .

[50]  G. P. Stone,et al.  Social Psychology Through Symbolic Interaction , 1970 .

[51]  R. Perinbanayagam.  The Definition of the Situation: an Analysis of the Ethnomethodological and Dramaturgical View* , 1974 .

[52]  H. S. Thayer.  Meaning and Action: A Study of American Pragmatism , 1973 .

[53]  Alfred Schutz,et al.  Studies in social theory , 1964 .

[54]  Thomas P. Wilson,et al.  Conceptions of Interaction and Forms of Sociological Explanation , 1970 .

[55]  Gary Alan Fine,et al.  Small Groups and Culture Creation: The Idioculture of Little League Baseball Teams , 1979 .

[56]  C. Mills,et al.  The Theory of Social and Economic Organization , 1948 .

[57]  A. Schutz.  On Phenomenology And Social Relations , 1970 .

[58]  J. Lewis.  The Classic American Pragmatists As Forerunners To Symbolic Interactionism , 1976 .

[59]  E. Goffman.  Stigma; Notes On The Management Of Spoiled Identity , 1964 .

[60]  William James,et al.  Essays in Radical Empiricism , 1907 .

[61]  R. Perinbanayagam.  The Significance of Others in the Thought of Alfred Schultz, G. H. Mead and C. H. Cooley* , 1975 .

[62]  J. Dewey.  Human Nature and Conduct , 1921 .

[63]  G. Psathas.  Everyday language : studies in ethnomethodology , 1981 .

[64]  E. Lemert.  Beyond Mead: The Societal Reaction to Deviance , 1974 .

[65]  Paul Diesing,et al.  Patterns of Discovery in the Social Sciences. , 1972 .