Bionic wavelet transform: a new time-frequency method based on an auditory model

In this paper, a new adaptive wavelet transform, named bionic wavelet transform (BWT), is developed based on a model of the active auditory system. The most distinguishing characteristic of BWT is that its resolution in the time-frequency domain can be adaptively adjusted not only by the signal frequency but also by the signal instantaneous amplitude and its first-order differential. The automatically adjusted resolution, even in a fixed frequency along the time-axis, is achieved by introducing the active control of the auditory system into the wavelet transform (WT). Other properties of BWT include that: 1) BWT is a nonlinear transform that has high sensitivity and frequency selectivity; 2) BWT represents the signal with a concentrated energy distribution; and 3) the inverse BWT can reconstruct the original signal from its time-frequency representation. In order to compare these three properties between BWT and WT, experiments were conducted on both constructed signals and real speech signals. The results show that BWT performs better than WT in these three aspects, and that BWT is appropriate for speech signal processing, especially for cochlear implants.

[1]  Douglas L. Jones,et al.  A high resolution data-adaptive time-frequency representation , 1990, ICASSP '87. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[2]  L Zheng,et al.  Synthesis and decomposition of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions based on an active auditory model. , 1999, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[3]  B. Moore Psychophysical tuning curves measured in simultaneous and forward masking. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  D. Lim,et al.  Cell and molecular basis of hearing. , 1998, Kidney international. Supplement.

[5]  Shangkai Gao,et al.  Implementation of CIS speech processing strategy for cochlear implants by using wavelet transform , 1998, ICSP '98. 1998 Fourth International Conference on Signal Processing (Cat. No.98TH8344).

[6]  M.L. Hilton,et al.  Wavelet and wavelet packet compression of electrocardiograms , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Thomas Gold,et al.  Hearing. II. The Physical Basis of the Action of the Cochlea , 1948, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[9]  R Probst,et al.  A review of otoacoustic emissions. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  D. Pollen,et al.  Phase relationships between adjacent simple cells in the visual cortex. , 1981, Science.

[11]  D. Kemp Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  M. Akay,et al.  Short-term analysis of heart-rate variability of adapted wavelet transforms , 1997, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[13]  P. Woodland,et al.  A computational model of the auditory periphery for speech and hearing research. II. Descending paths. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  C. P. Behrenbruch,et al.  SNR improvement, filtering and spectral equalisation in cochlear implants using wavelet techniques , 1998, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Bioelectromagnetism (Cat. No.98TH8269).

[15]  D. D. Greenwood A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Yuan-Ting Zhang,et al.  The application of bionic wavelet transform to speech signal processing in cochlear implants using neural network simulations , 2002, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng..

[17]  A. Hubbard,et al.  A traveling-wave amplifier model of the cochlea. , 1993, Science.