An evaluation of in vitro protein–protein interaction techniques: Assessing contaminating background proteins

Determination of protein–protein interactions is an important component in assigning function and discerning the biological relevance of proteins within a broader cellular context. In vitro protein–protein interaction methodologies, including affinity chromatography, coimmunoprecipitation, and newer approaches such as protein chip arrays, hold much promise in the detection of protein interactions, particularly in well‐characterized organisms with sequenced genomes. However, each of these approaches attracts certain background proteins that can thwart detection and identification of true interactors. In addition, recombinant proteins expressed in Escherichia coli are also extensively used to assess protein–protein interactions, and background proteins in these isolates can thus contaminate interaction studies. Rigorous validation of a true interaction thus requires not only that an interaction be found by alternate techniques, but more importantly that researchers be aware of and control for matrix/support dependence. Here, we evaluate these methods for proteins interacting with DmsD (an E. coli redox enzyme maturation protein chaperone), in vitro, using E. coli subcellular fractions as prey sources. We compare and contrast the various in vitro interaction methods to identify some of the background proteins and protein profiles that are inherent to each of the methods in an E. coli system.

[1]  A. Szabó,et al.  Surface plasmon resonance and its use in biomolecular interaction analysis (BIA). , 1995, Current opinion in structural biology.

[2]  R. Turner,et al.  The Twin-arginine Leader-binding Protein, DmsD, Interacts with the TatB and TatC Subunits of the Escherichia coli Twin-arginine Translocase* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  I. Oresnik,et al.  Identification of a twin‐arginine leader‐binding protein , 2001, Molecular microbiology.

[4]  Gary D. Bader,et al.  An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks , 2003, BMC Bioinformatics.

[5]  T. Born,et al.  Use of surface‐enhanced laser desorption/ionization ‐time of flight to explore bacterial proteomes , 2004, Proteomics.

[6]  A. Archakov,et al.  Proteomic Technologies in Modern Biomedical Science , 2002, Biochemistry (Moscow).

[7]  M. Snyder,et al.  Protein chip technology. , 2003, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[8]  Shmuel Sattath,et al.  How reliable are experimental protein-protein interaction data? , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  F. Arnold,et al.  Multiple-site binding interactions in metal-affinity chromatography. I. Equilibrium binding of engineered histidine-containing cytochromes c. , 1994, Journal of chromatography. A.

[10]  J. Weiner,et al.  Topological characterization of Escherichia coli DMSO reductase by electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy of an engineered [3Fe-4S] cluster. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[11]  R. Fernández-Lafuente,et al.  Affinity chromatography of polyhistidine tagged enzymes. New dextran-coated immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography matrices for prevention of undesired multipoint adsorptions. , 2001, Journal of chromatography. A.

[12]  A. Ishihama,et al.  Systematic search for zinc-binding proteins in Escherichia coli. , 2002, European journal of biochemistry.

[13]  J. Walker,et al.  Over-production of proteins in Escherichia coli: mutant hosts that allow synthesis of some membrane proteins and globular proteins at high levels. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  Frank Sargent,et al.  The Tat protein translocation pathway and its role in microbial physiology. , 2003, Advances in microbial physiology.

[15]  B. Honoré,et al.  Functional genomics studied by proteomics. , 2004, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[16]  J. Weiner,et al.  Escherichia coli TehB RequiresS-Adenosylmethionine as a Cofactor To Mediate Tellurite Resistance , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[17]  Frank Sargent,et al.  Sequence analysis of bacterial redox enzyme maturation proteins (REMPs). , 2004, Canadian journal of microbiology.

[18]  I. Onn,et al.  Redox Potential Regulates Binding of Universal Minicircle Sequence Binding Protein at the Kinetoplast DNA Replication Origin , 2004, Eukaryotic Cell.

[19]  Min-Seon Park,et al.  Specific Interactions between the Human RAD51 and RAD52 Proteins (*) , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  L. Enquist,et al.  Experiments With Gene Fusions , 1984 .

[21]  A. Emili,et al.  Interaction network containing conserved and essential protein complexes in Escherichia coli , 2005, Nature.

[22]  P. Loetscher,et al.  Immobilization of monoclonal antibodies for affinity chromatography using a chelating peptide. , 1992, Journal of Chromatography A.

[23]  K. Young Yeast two-hybrid: so many interactions, (in) so little time... , 1998, Biology of reproduction.

[24]  J. Piehler New methodologies for measuring protein interactions in vivo and in vitro. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[25]  B. Séraphin,et al.  A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.

[26]  Lan V. Zhang,et al.  Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein–protein interaction network , 2004, Nature.

[27]  E. Golemis,et al.  Using the yeast interaction trap and other two-hybrid-based approaches to study protein-protein interactions. , 2001, Methods.

[28]  J. Wojcik,et al.  Functional proteomics mapping of a human signaling pathway. , 2004, Genome research.

[29]  N. Tolbert,et al.  A modification of the Lowry procedure to simplify protein determination in membrane and lipoprotein samples. , 1978, Analytical biochemistry.

[30]  J. Thornton,et al.  Structural characterisation and functional significance of transient protein-protein interactions. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  S. Fields,et al.  Protein-protein interactions: methods for detection and analysis , 1995, Microbiological reviews.

[32]  M. Walid Qoronfleh,et al.  Use of Immunomatrix Methods to Improve Protein-Protein Interaction Detection , 2003, Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology.

[33]  F. Roquet,et al.  Casein interactions studied by the surface plasmon resonance technique. , 2002, Journal of dairy science.

[34]  H. Rye,et al.  Application of fluorescence resonance energy transfer to the GroEL-GroES chaperonin reaction. , 2001, Methods.

[35]  B. Kay,et al.  Screening phage-displayed combinatorial peptide libraries. , 2001, Methods.

[36]  B. Séraphin,et al.  The tandem affinity purification (TAP) method: a general procedure of protein complex purification. , 2001, Methods.

[37]  J. Weiner,et al.  Organization of dimethyl sulfoxide reductase in the plasma membrane of Escherichia coli , 1990, Journal of bacteriology.

[38]  P. Predki Functional protein microarrays: ripe for discovery. , 2004, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[39]  S. Fields,et al.  Protein analysis on a proteomic scale , 2003, Nature.

[40]  D. Hoelzer,et al.  Far-Western based protein-protein interaction screening of high-density protein filter arrays. , 2001, Journal of biotechnology.

[41]  A. Plückthun,et al.  An Escherichia coli protein consisting of a domain homologous to FK506-binding proteins (FKBP) and a new metal binding motif. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[42]  R. Turner,et al.  DmsD is required for the biogenesis of DMSO reductase in Escherichia coli but not for the interaction of the DmsA signal peptide with the Tat apparatus , 2003, FEBS letters.

[43]  Juergen Kast,et al.  Identification of protein‐protein interactions using in vivo cross‐linking and mass spectrometry , 2004, Proteomics.

[44]  K. Young,et al.  slyD, a host gene required for phi X174 lysis, is related to the FK506-binding protein family of peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans-isomerases. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[45]  T. O’Halloran,et al.  The ferric uptake regulation (Fur) repressor is a zinc metalloprotein. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[46]  W. Willats,et al.  Phage display: practicalities and prospects , 2002, Plant Molecular Biology.