Validating Dose Uncertainty Estimates Produced by AUTODIRECT: An Automated Program to Evaluate Deformable Image Registration Accuracy

Deformable image registration is a powerful tool for mapping information, such as radiation therapy dose calculations, from one computed tomography image to another. However, deformable image registration is susceptible to mapping errors. Recently, an automated deformable image registration evaluation of confidence tool was proposed to predict voxel-specific deformable image registration dose mapping errors on a patient-by-patient basis. The purpose of this work is to conduct an extensive analysis of automated deformable image registration evaluation of confidence tool to show its effectiveness in estimating dose mapping errors. The proposed format of automated deformable image registration evaluation of confidence tool utilizes 4 simulated patient deformations (3 B-spline-based deformations and 1 rigid transformation) to predict the uncertainty in a deformable image registration algorithm’s performance. This workflow is validated for 2 DIR algorithms (B-spline multipass from Velocity and Plastimatch) with 1 physical and 11 virtual phantoms, which have known ground-truth deformations, and with 3 pairs of real patient lung images, which have several hundred identified landmarks. The true dose mapping error distributions closely followed the Student t distributions predicted by automated deformable image registration evaluation of confidence tool for the validation tests: on average, the automated deformable image registration evaluation of confidence tool–produced confidence levels of 50%, 68%, and 95% contained 48.8%, 66.3%, and 93.8% and 50.1%, 67.6%, and 93.8% of the actual errors from Velocity and Plastimatch, respectively. Despite the sparsity of landmark points, the observed error distribution from the 3 lung patient data sets also followed the expected error distribution. The dose error distributions from automated deformable image registration evaluation of confidence tool also demonstrate good resemblance to the true dose error distributions. Automated deformable image registration evaluation of confidence tool was also found to produce accurate confidence intervals for the dose–volume histograms of the deformed dose.

[1]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  Toward adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck patients: Feasibility study on using CT-to-CBCT deformable registration for "dose of the day" calculations. , 2014, Medical physics.

[2]  Yutaka Takahashi,et al.  Estimation of rectal dose using daily megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography and deformable image registration. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  Jeffrey V Siebers,et al.  A method to estimate the effect of deformable image registration uncertainties on daily dose mapping. , 2012, Medical physics.

[4]  Di Yan,et al.  Automatic delineation of on-line head-and-neck computed tomography images: toward on-line adaptive radiotherapy. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  Student,et al.  THE PROBABLE ERROR OF A MEAN , 1908 .

[6]  Quan Chen,et al.  Objective assessment of deformable image registration in radiotherapy: a multi-institution study. , 2007, Medical physics.

[7]  N Kandasamy,et al.  On developing B-spline registration algorithms for multi-core processors , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Jeffrey V Siebers,et al.  A distance to dose difference tool for estimating the required spatial accuracy of a displacement vector field. , 2010, Medical physics.

[10]  Hojin Kim,et al.  An automated deformable image registration evaluation of confidence tool , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  J. Pouliot,et al.  The need for application-based adaptation of deformable image registration. , 2012, Medical physics.

[12]  Quan Chen,et al.  Automatic re-contouring in 4D radiotherapy , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Katja M Langen,et al.  A virtual phantom library for the quantification of deformable image registration uncertainties in patients with cancers of the head and neck. , 2013, Medical physics.

[14]  Neil Kirby,et al.  Site-specific deformable imaging registration algorithm selection using patient-based simulated deformations. , 2013, Medical physics.

[15]  Weiguo Lu,et al.  Deformable registration of the planning image (kVCT) and the daily images (MVCT) for adaptive radiation therapy , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  R. Castillo,et al.  A framework for evaluation of deformable image registration spatial accuracy using large landmark point sets , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  K. Brock.  Results of a multi-institution deformable registration accuracy study (MIDRAS). , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  Matthias Guckenberger,et al.  A multi-institution evaluation of deformable image registration algorithms for automatic organ delineation in adaptive head and neck radiotherapy , 2012, Radiation oncology.

[19]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[20]  Mathieu De Craene,et al.  Tumour delineation and cumulative dose computation in radiotherapy based on deformable registration of respiratory correlated CT images of lung cancer patients. , 2007, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[21]  Benoît Macq,et al.  Comparison of 12 deformable registration strategies in adaptive radiation therapy for the treatment of head and neck tumors. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[22]  Sanford L. Meeks,et al.  Benchmarking of five commercial deformable image registration algorithms for head and neck patients , 2016, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[23]  W. Tomé,et al.  On the dosimetric effect and reduction of inverse consistency and transitivity errors in deformable image registration for dose accumulation. , 2011, Medical physics.

[24]  Xiao Han,et al.  Atlas-Based Auto-segmentation of Head and Neck CT Images , 2008, MICCAI.

[25]  Rolf Bendl,et al.  Accuracy quantification of a deformable image registration tool applied in a clinical setting , 2014, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[26]  S. Joshi,et al.  Automatic Segmentation of Intra-treatment CT Images for Adaptive Radiation Therapy of the Prostate , 2005, MICCAI.

[27]  Nesrin Dogan,et al.  Evaluation of the tool “Reg Refine” for user‐guided deformable image registration , 2016, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[28]  J. Pouliot,et al.  A three-dimensional head-and-neck phantom for validation of multimodality deformable image registration for adaptive radiotherapy. , 2014, Medical physics.