iPractice: Piloting the Effectiveness of a Tablet-Based Home Practice Program in Aphasia Treatment

The current study investigated the effectiveness of a home practice program based on the iPad (Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA), implemented after 2 weeks of intensive language therapy, for maintaining and augmenting treatment gains in people with chronic poststroke aphasia. Five of eight original participants completed the 6-month home practice program in which they autonomously practiced retrieving words for objects and actions. Half of these words had been trained and half were untrained during therapy. Practice included tasks such as naming to confrontation, repeating from a video model, and picture/word matching presented on an iPad. All participants maintained advances made on words trained during the intensive treatment and additionally were able to learn new words by practicing daily over a 6-month period. The iPad and other tablet devices have great potential for personalized home practice to maintain and augment traditional aphasia rehabilitation. It appears that motivation to use the technology and adequate training are more important factors than age, aphasia type or severity, or prior experience with computers.

[1]  A. Raymer,et al.  Evidence-based systematic review: effects of intensity of treatment and constraint-induced language therapy for individuals with stroke-induced aphasia. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[2]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Constraint-Induced Therapy of Chronic Aphasia After Stroke , 2001, Stroke.

[3]  F. Pulvermüller,et al.  Aphasia therapy on a neuroscience basis , 2008, Aphasiology.

[4]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  A computer-implemented protocol for treatment of naming disorders: Evaluation of clinician-guided and partially self-guided instruction , 2002 .

[5]  Therapy Session 2.0: From Static to Dynamic With the iPad , 2012 .

[6]  R. Teasell,et al.  Intensity of Aphasia Therapy, Impact on Recovery , 2003, Stroke.

[7]  J. Masterson,et al.  Description of a set of 164 nounsand 102 verbs matched for printed word frequency, familiarityand age-of-acquisition , 1998, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[8]  J. Kleim,et al.  Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[9]  M. Wilcox,et al.  Adult Aphasia Rehabilitation: Applied Pragmatics , 1985 .

[10]  G. Ramsberger,et al.  Self-administered cued naming therapy: a single-participant investigation of a computer-based therapy program replicated in four cases. , 2007, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[11]  A. Basso,et al.  Aphasia Therapy or The importance of being earnest , 2001 .

[12]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[13]  David A. Copland,et al.  Mobile computing technology and aphasia: An integrated review of accessibility and potential uses , 2013 .

[14]  T. Olsen,et al.  Improvement of oral naming by unsupervised computerised rehabilitation , 2001 .

[15]  Audrey L Holland,et al.  How to use apps clinically in the treatment of aphasia. , 2012, Seminars in speech and language.

[16]  Randall R. Robey,et al.  Evaluating Single-Subject Treatment Research: Lessons Learned from the Aphasia Literature , 2006, Neuropsychology Review.

[17]  Sameer Singh,et al.  Designing intelligent interfaces for users with memory and language limitations , 2000 .

[18]  Munyaradzi Dimairo,et al.  , Poststroke : A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Computer Therapy Compared With Usual Care for People With Long-Standing Aphasia , 2012 .

[19]  Roberta J. Elman.  The Internet and aphasia: Crossing the digital divide , 2001 .