Computer Experience on Applicant Reactions Selection in the Information Age: The Impact of Privacy Concerns and
暂无分享,去创建一个
Donald M. Truxillo | Michael A. Campion | Jennifer S. Tucker | Berrin Erdogan | Talya N. Bauer | T. Bauer | D. Truxillo | B. Erdogan | M. Campion
[1] Robert E. Ployhart,et al. Applicants’ Perceptions of Selection Procedures and Decisions: A Critical Review and Agenda for the Future , 2000 .
[2] James J. Lindsay,et al. Research in the Psychological Laboratory , 1999 .
[3] Filip Lievens,et al. Privacy and Attitudes Towards Internet-Based Selection Systems: A Cross-Cultural Comparison , 2003 .
[4] Robert E. Ployhart,et al. Applicants' reactions to the fairness of selection procedures: the effects of positive rule violations and time of measurement. , 1998, The Journal of applied psychology.
[5] Donald M. Truxillo,et al. Development and examination of an expectancy-based measure of test-taking motivation. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.
[6] John P. Hausknecht,et al. Applicant Reactions to Selection Procedures: An Updated Model and Meta-Analysis , 2004 .
[7] N. Anderson. Applicant and Recruiter Reactions to New Technology in Selection: A Critical Review and Agenda for Future Research , 2003 .
[8] Robert E. Ployhart,et al. Test Preparation Programs in Selection Contexts: Self-Selection and Program Effectiveness , 1998 .
[9] Donald M. Truxillo,et al. Applicant Reactions to Different Selection Technology: Face-to-Face, Interactive Voice Response, and Computer-Assisted Telephone Screening Interviews , 2004 .
[10] James W. Smither,et al. APPLICANT REACTIONS TO SELECTION PROCEDURES , 2006 .
[11] R. Bies,et al. Consumer Privacy: Balancing Economic and Justice Considerations , 2003 .
[12] Karl G. Jöreskog,et al. Lisrel 8: User's Reference Guide , 1997 .
[13] Angelo S. DeNisi,et al. INTERPERSONAL AFFECT AND PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL: A FIELD STUDY , 1996 .
[14] Silvia Moscoso,et al. Internet-based Personality Testing: Equivalence of Measures and Assesses' Perceptions and Reactions , 2003 .
[15] Sandra J. Milberg,et al. Information Privacy: Corporate Management and National Regulation , 2000 .
[16] Chockalingam Viswesvaran,et al. Introduction to Special Issue: Role of Technology in Shaping the Future of Staffing and Assessment , 2003 .
[17] Erik R. Eddy,et al. THE EFFECTS OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT POLICIES ON REACTIONS TO HUMAN RESOURCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS: AN INTEGRATION OF PRIVACY AND PROCEDURAL JUSTICE PERSPECTIVES , 1999 .
[18] Robert E. Ployhart,et al. WEB‐BASED AND PAPER‐AND‐PENCIL TESTING OF APPLICANTS IN A PROCTORED SETTING: ARE PERSONALITY, BIODATA, AND SITUATIONAL JUDGMENT TESTS COMPARABLE? , 2003 .
[19] Hal G. Gueutal,et al. The brave new world of eHR : human resources management in the digital age , 2005 .
[20] L. Hayduk. Structural equation modeling with LISREL , 1987 .
[21] Jeffrey A. Miles,et al. The effects of videoconference, telephone, and face-to-face media on interviewer and applicant judgments in employment interviews , 2001 .
[22] Claire Gauzente,et al. “To legislate or not to legislate”: a comparative exploratory study of privacy/personalisation factors affecting French, UK and US Web sites , 2003 .
[23] Robert O'Harrow,et al. No place to hide , 1997, Science.
[24] Selection fairness information and applicant reactions: a longitudinal field study. , 2002 .
[25] Philip Bobko,et al. Selection Testing via the Internet: Practical Considerations and Exploratory Empirical Findings* , 2004 .
[26] Scott B. MacKenzie,et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.
[27] Bradley J. Alge,et al. Effects of computer surveillance on perceptions of privacy and procedural justice. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.
[28] Gareth R. Jones,et al. The role of information technology in the organization: a review, model, and assessment , 2001 .
[29] Suzanne S. Masterson,et al. A trickle-down model of organizational justice: relating employees' and customers' perceptions of and reactions to fairness. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.
[30] Michael A. Campion,et al. Longitudinal Assessment of Applicant Reactions to Employment Testing and Test Outcome Feedback , 1998 .
[31] S. West,et al. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .
[32] P. Levy,et al. Recruitment on the Net: How Do Organizational Web Site Characteristics Influence , 2004 .
[33] Gina J. Medsker,et al. A Review of Current Practices for Evaluating Causal Models in Organizational Behavior and Human Resources Management Research , 1994 .
[34] Dianna L. Stone,et al. Personnel Selection Procedures and Invasion of Privacy , 2003 .
[35] Richard D. Arvey,et al. MOTIVATIONAL COMPONENTS OF TEST TAKING , 1990 .
[36] Richard P. DeShon,et al. Reactions to cognitive ability tests: the relationships between race, test performance, face validity perceptions, and test-taking motivation. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.
[37] A. Ryan,et al. Reactions to Computerized Testing in Selection Contexts , 2003 .
[38] T. Bauer,et al. Applicant reactions to test score banding in entry-level and promotional contexts. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.
[39] Donald M. Truxillo,et al. The Importance of Organizational Justice in Personnel Selection: Defining When Selection Fairness Really Matters , 2004 .
[40] S. Gilliland. The Perceived Fairness of Selection Systems: An Organizational Justice Perspective , 1993 .
[41] Barry M. Goldman. Toward an Understanding of Employment Discrimination Claiming: An Integration of Organizational Justice and Social Information Processing Theories , 2001 .
[42] L. Hayduk,et al. Latent Variable Interaction and Quadratic Effect Estimation: A Two-Step Technique Using Structural Equation Analysis , 1996 .
[43] Robert Folger,et al. Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management , 1998 .